On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 3:30:57 PM UTC-5, Fluid Dynamics wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 4:09:54 PM UTC-4, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Yes, I think that's largely correct. The goal of Richard's project is to >> create an information model (data) describing a project from the >> perspective of use. Codeq goes much deeper by integrating code history - >> that allows you to ask very interesting and useful questions, however I >> believe they are different than questions like: what records exist in this >> particular version of a library I'm using? >> > > What protocols exist may be an even more interesting question. A protocol > exposed to consumers of a library is likely to be a particularly useful > (deliberately so) extension point. >
Yes, exactly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
