On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MIT and BSD are not reciprocal licenses. I want a reciprocal license.
What does it mean that a license is reciprocal?
--
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Christian Vest Hansen.
--~--~-~--~~~---~-
On Nov 2, 10:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (There are examples of projects 'weakening' the GPL in various ways
> to suit their needs.)
Just out of curiosity (I don't have an interest in this particular
issue at the moment so I'm not taking a side in this debate), what
James Reeves wrote:
> On Nov 2, 6:50 pm, Phlex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> is a program I am doing using
>> clojure considered as a derivative work ?
>>
>
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6366
>
>
>
Thank you,
Sacha
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Hi. Nowadays I'm happy with playing Clojure. I really appreciate Rich
Hickey and contributors.
When I evaluate (run-tests) in a repl of my terminal, I can see test
messages. But when I do it in slime, I can't see any messages. How I
can see test results in slime?
in repl:
user=> (run-tests)
Test
Rich Hickey wrote:
> On Oct 30, 3:57 pm, bc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there any way to enter an annotation or comments when a file is
> > uploaded to the Clojure Google Groups file area? I've recently had a
> > look at a few things there and it would be nice to have some
On Nov 2, 5:11 pm, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want a reciprocal license.
> But I don't want the license to apply to, or dictate anything about,
> non-derivative work that is combined with mine, as GPL does. I think
> doing so is fundamentally wrong.
It is your code and you are fre
On Nov 2, 7:12 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 1:56 pm, ".Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For an earlier discussion of this same topic,
> > seehttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/735aa7f1c...
>
> > Bill
>
> I agree that GPL inc
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Michael Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:23 PM, bc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've posted a new article on my blog about Clojure Namespaces:
>> http://bc.tech.coop/blog/081029.html
>>
>> I would ap
On Nov 2, 1:56 pm, ".Bill Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For an earlier discussion of this same topic,
> seehttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/735aa7f1c...
>
> Bill
I agree that GPL incompatibility isn't a concern for Clojure *users*.
It would be a practical proble
On Sunday 02 November 2008 16:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Nov 2, 11:06 am, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > many projects and businesses, both
> > commercial and open-source, will categorically not use GPL-licensed
> > software in their projects.
>
> straw man again...
Please
On Nov 2, 3:28 pm, "a r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, for me a dual CPL/LGPL license would be nicer. This is purely
> for practical reasons - Java itself going GPL, reusing (those few) GPL
> Java libraries or embeddingClojurecompiler in GPL applications (this
> might be OK with CPL, I'm
On Nov 2, 1:16 pm, Matthias Benkard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would hate to seeclojureadopting the GPL.
>
> Certainly, something compatible with the GPL wouldn't have to be the
> GPL itself.
Thank you. True!
cs
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mes
On Nov 2, 11:06 am, Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> many projects and businesses, both
> commercial and open-source, will categorically not use GPL-licensed
> software in their projects.
straw man again.They will use a GPL compatible license like MIT
and BSD and many others.
I
On Nov 2, 10:52 am, jdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I personally dislike GPL
Opinions about the GPL are straw men. No one is advocating
conversion to GPLjust a GPL compatible license.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subs
I am not advocating Clojure move to the GPL!!! I don't want to fight
that battle.
However, a slight change to a GPL *compatible* license would be
*very* welcome
and I think benefit Clojure.
Chris
On Nov 2, 10:50 am, Phlex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The biggest pr
I really like being able to find and check documentation in the REPL
with find-doc and doc, but I often would like to see the source code
of a function or macro to be able to understand it better or learn
from the implementation. To do this I switch into an editor with
boot.clj, find and read the
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello. I am an open source programmer and fan of Clojure!
> I wanted to express my concern about your wonderful language project
> in the
> hopes it may help it succeed even more.
CPL is very liberal and I am pretty
For an earlier discussion of this same topic, see
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/735aa7f1cecf583/05885644fb78fea1?lnk=gst&q=+Common+Public+License+#05885644fb78fea1
Bill
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
On 1 Nov., 14:12, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 1:20 pm, André Thieme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is what I tried:
>
> > user> (defn make-lyst [& items]
> > (proxy [clojure.lang.IPersistentList] []
> > (cons [obj] (cons obj this))
> >
> I would hate to see clojure adopting the GPL.
Certainly, something compatible with the GPL wouldn't have to be the
GPL itself.
(This doesn't mean I'd like to see Clojure's license changed. Just
wanted to clarify things.)
Matthias
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rece
On Nov 2, 6:50 pm, Phlex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would hate to see clojure adopting the GPL.
> About the CPL (clojure's license) : is a program I am doing using
> clojure considered as a derivative work ?
According to an article written by an attorney working for the Open
Source Initiative
On Saturday 01 November 2008 10:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>
> Are you really sure you want/need to use the Common Public License
> for your language? The biggest problem I see with this license is
> that it is not compatible with the GPL. This means a lot to many
> people and I would ha
On Nov 1, 7:33 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you really sure you want/need to use the Common Public License for
> your
> language? The biggest problem I see with this license is that it is
> not
> compatible with the GPL. This means a lot to many people and I would
> h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The biggest problem I see with this license is that it is
> not
> compatible with the GPL.
I would hate to see clojure adopting the GPL.
About the CPL (clojure's license) : is a program I am doing using
clojure considered as a derivative work ?
Sacha
--~--~-
Rather than changing where the files are stored, it might be easier to
create an annotations page on the wiki that just links to the Google
Groups files.
Justin
On Oct 31, 10:34 am, Stuart Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Does the wiki accept file uploads?
> -S
>
> On Oct 31, 7:46 am, Rich H
Hi,
Thank you for your good wrapper for processing. I think it makes
simplify to use PApplet class in clojure.
I found 'stroke-weight in processing.clj may be wrong - I think it
should call strokeWeight instead of strokeJoin.
Best regards,
On Sep 9, 8:28 am, fyuryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hello. I am an open source programmer and fan of Clojure!
I wanted to express my concern about your wonderful language project
in the
hopes it may help it succeed even more.
Are you really sure you want/need to use the Common Public License for
your
language? The biggest problem I see with this
27 matches
Mail list logo
