m now. But I went ahead and ran the "make
>> install", it seems to have installed but when I run freshclam, I'm
>> back to the "malformed database" issue but I don't know if that is
>> because of the errors in the "make" command. So back to testi
I have clam 0.103.4 running on a couple CentOS 5.11 boxes and I had to build
A couple things and place them in non standard locations (for instance
/opt/openssl-1.1.1g)
There are also 4 make files that will trigger -W errors
"-Wno-logical-op-parentheses" "-Wno-dangling-else"
That have to be edited
I of course meant RM not RF, sorry.
Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> On Thursday 29 July 2021 12:28:21 Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
>>> On Thursday 29 July 2021 06:33:02 Rick Cooper wrote:
>>>> Had the same problem, insta
Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> On Thursday 29 July 2021 12:28:21 Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
>>> On Thursday 29 July 2021 06:33:02 Rick Cooper wrote:
>>>> Had the same problem, install the check package. It's a unit
Gene Heskett via clamav-users wrote:
> On Thursday 29 July 2021 06:33:02 Rick Cooper wrote:
>
>> Had the same problem, install the check package. It's a unit test
>> framework.
> Did that, and about 5 or 6 other pkgs I've never needed before and it
> final
Sounds fair and gives a lot more time to migrate
_
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 7:54 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: Micah Snyder (micasnyd); ClamAV Development
Subject: [c
Had the same problem, install the check package. It's a unit test framework.
--
rcoo...@dwford.com
Phone : (260) 414-8566
On July 29, 2021 5:50:26 AM EDT, Gene Heskett via clamav-users
wrote:
>On Thursday 29 July 2021 03:52:57 G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
>
>> Hi Gene,
>>
>> On Wed, 28
!
On Jul 28, 2021, at 7:17 AM, Rick Cooper wrote:
total disregard for the user base, not so much as a poll or query on the
lists, enjoy your new cutting edge toys
Corporate BS rears it's ugly head again, First snort, then centos and now
clamav.
I think this is unfair. This is the fee
icial recommendation to use Homebrew
on macOS.
Regards
Mark
On 26 Jul 2021, at 4:35 pm, Rick Cooper wrote:
And what, exactly, is the reason for moving to cmake? I am sure you know
it's going to be problematic for thousands of people so I am curious what
tremendous gain of spee
Create the build dir in the source dir
Or reference.. /you clam source dir instead of..
--
rcoo...@dwford.com
Phone : (260) 414-8566
On July 27, 2021 12:31:13 PM EDT, Gene Heskett via clamav-users
wrote:
>Greetings;
>
>unpack freshly downloaded tarball, 1st step from INSTALL.md is
>mkdir buil
And what, exactly, is the reason for moving to cmake? I am sure you know
it's going to be problematic for thousands of people so I am curious what
tremendous gain of speed, size, memory usage or seciurity the other users
get from this change, or if it's just a convenience thing for the
developers?
: Offline Updating
>On 18/03/2021 23:08, Rick Cooper wrote:
>>Just verified if I change chrome's agent string to Internet Explorer 11
can
>>access the page just fine
On 18.03.21 23:17, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
>That's interesting, Edge uses the Chromium engine, I presume
Just verified if I change chrome's agent string to Internet Explorer 11 can
access the page just fine
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:28 AM
To: presario2...@y
Just looked at the page source, fired up internet explorer 11 and can
navigate the site, pulled out firefox and can also navigate the site.
Appears to be no go with chrome and Edge
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of G.W. Haywo
From the USA. Always used freshclam, always 4 times a day
Here is what is displayed when going to www.clamav.net (https doesn't
matter)
Error 1020 Ray ID: 631e31d63cdb03bc 2021-03-18 11:41:55 UTC
Access denied
What happened?
This website is using a security service to protect itself from online
Perhaps you should look into MailScanner and MailWatch. Mailscanner (package
for Suse available) will handle the interaction with spamassassin and clamd
(as well as other A/V solutions) and MailWatch provides a nice GUI for
quarantine and archive. Once set they just work.
Rick
Joe Acquisto-j4 wro
Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>>
>>> Any pointers for using the ClamAVPlugin?
>>
>> Could you flesh that out a bit?
>> . . .
>> One of the things I do is scan stuff using my own Perl milter, but it
>> never occurred to me that I needed a Pe
freshclam is the only way, but it has to do a bazillion things before
it gives an answer.
I Was hoping for a quick way to ping somewhere and get the most recent version
for comparison.
But I guess I’ll have to pull in the whole downloads page and read the version
off that ☹
From: Rick Coope
look in the man page for freshclam:
--on-outdated-execute=COMMAND
Execute COMMAND when freshclam reports outdated version. In the command
string %v will be replaced by the new version number.
in the config file OnOutdatedExecute
I have a script that sends me an email when freshclam sees the new
Not wanting to appear stuipid but exactly what important security feature
does the new lincurl include that is so important to moving clamav forward?
Rick
_
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
Sent: Tuesd
omonte7 wrote:
> Chuck Swiger-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:42 AM, omonte7 wrote:
>>> Yeah, I saw that in the man page but unfortunately I'm not using a
>>> proxy. I can't connect on port 80 through the firewall so I'm
>>> restricted to any other port. Thanks.
>>
>> If you need HTTP acces
Original Message
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Giampaolo
Tomassoni Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:17 PM To: 'ClamAV users ML'
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] The EOL tweets
>> The sysadmins could have done this by turnin
out that I just got back to where I could pickup the thread again,
thanks
>
> FAS
>
> Török Edwin wrote:
>> On 2009-10-29 15:37, Rick Cooper wrote:
>>> Original Message
>>> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
>>> [mailto:clamav-user
Original Message
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3
> I'm trying to install 0.95.3 on a RedHa
Original Message
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Matus UHLAR -
fantomas Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:06 AM To:
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] How exactly does
the API function inClamAV source
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
> [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of
> Bill Landry
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:02 PM
> To: sanesecur...@freelists.org;
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net; amavis-u...@lists.sourceforge.net
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Eric Rostetter
> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 12:44 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Handling of unknown
> configuration lines (was Re:Stop it!)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Eric Rostetter
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 1:09 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Stop it!
>
> Quoting Ri
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Eric Rostetter
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 12:20 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Stop it!
>
> Quoting Colin Alston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Noel Jones
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:31 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94
>
> Jose Julian Buda wrote:
> >
> > you mean it`s a mailscanner p
I have and I recommend not. I use squirm and viralator and even modified
viralator to use clamd scan and it was really too slow for any real traffic.
Fpscan, however, works a treat. Very, very fast. There are also issues with
various download auto start methods not working but most supply the "if y
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dariusz Wojciechowski
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:16 AM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Mailscanner doesn't work with 0.92
> due to libclamavincomp
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dennis Peterson
> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 6:44 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] speeding up clamav
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Chuck Swiger
> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 10:42 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] speeding up clamav
>
> Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > How ca
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Landry
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 1:34 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Updated unofficial signatures
> download script
>
[...]
> > Is it possible
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Landry
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 2:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Updated unofficial signatures
> download script
>
> Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Landry
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 12:25 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Type 4 signatures not detected
> in some cases
>
> Spam Administrator wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Schramm e.K. [ Deutschland ]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:16 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav needs 3 minutes to start
>
> >
> > That means 3:13 for
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Conrad Zane Minnaar
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:06 AM
> To: 'ClamAV users ML'
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav needs 3 minutes to start
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Rudd
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:10 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan extremly slow
>
[...]
>
> That, or mail servers that scan their email in bulk
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Spuhler
> Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 8:37 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: [Clamav-users] clamscan extremly slow
>
> I posted on another list as well, but thou
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:07 AM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Sanesecurity Sigs: Important News
>
> * Ri
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ralf Hildebrandt
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:49 PM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Sanesecurity Sigs: Important News
>
> * Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:09 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] RAR Support
>
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:07:43 -0600
> Jorge Valdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexander
> Lelyakin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:15 AM
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: [Clamav-users] RAR module failure even with external unrar
>
>
> I have just encountered a probl
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerry Doris
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:06 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Mail::ClamAV on FC2
>
>
> On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 09:03, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Gerry Doris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:18 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Upgrade to 0.80rc3 breaks Exim malware
> acl
>
>
> Rick Coope
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:57 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Upgrade to 0.80rc3 breaks Exim malware
> acl
>
>
> Rick Cooper wro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward
> Raymond Kryda
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Upgrade to 0.80rc3 breaks Exim malware acl
>
>
> I'm having a hard time getting
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:38 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Detection problem?
>
>
> At 14:17 5.10.2004 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
> But how do I deny fragment
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nigel Horne
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:02 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Detection problem?
>
>
> On Tuesday 05 Oct 2004 19:34, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> > I am running a clama
# in clamd disabled).
#ClamukoScanArchive
And still when clamd initializes it turns on dazuko. Any thoughts?
Rick Cooper
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---
52 matches
Mail list logo
