> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dennis Peterson > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 6:44 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] speeding up clamav > > Rick Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > Chuck Swiger > > > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 10:42 AM > > > To: ClamAV users ML > > > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] speeding up clamav > > > [...] > > Now granted, not likely to scan 15mg email attachments but > I also scan ftp > > and http downloads and cannot use clam for either because > if someone > > downloads a 50mg file it takes forever, f-prot is still > measured in seconds. > > > > You left out a metric that has an impact on my business: > > F-PROT Antivirus for Solaris Mail Servers > Number of Users Annual license fee > 1-10 US$ 130 > 11-24 US$ 250 > 25-49 US$ 399 > 50-99 US$ 499 > 100-199 US$ 799 > 200-299 US$ 1099 >
No argument from me, but it still begs the question why so much slower? I think clam is one of the best opensource projects in terms of impact on the community, and I certainly didn't mean to knock it in any way but I do wonder why so much slower in performance when it's so competative (or better) in about every other aspect. Rick -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
