----Original Message---- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Giampaolo Tomassoni Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:17 PM To: 'ClamAV users ML' Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] The EOL tweets
>> The sysadmins could have done this by turning off freshclam...... and >> saved themselves from having to deal with the upgrade..... > > Who is the sysadmin of an unmanaged box? > > If nobody had to turn off freshclam, why clamscan had to stop working? > > In this thread I'm seeing a lot of people blaming the sysadmin. Is it > crowded by sysadmins who like to show they are much more competent than > their colleagues? > > Why nobody from the ClamAV team likes to explain to *users* why they > decided > to stop their own working clamscan, when there were tons of suitable > alternatives? > > Nobody here gave a serious rationale about it. The way "sysadmins" are > attacked here, seems to me that the 0.96 case has nothing to do with open > software, but instead with marketing. > > So please, the genius in the management who came out with this smart idea > may please came out and explain to us the why? Many people already know > the > when... > > Giampaolo > http://www.clamav.net/eol-clamav-094/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
