Thank you all for the quick replies - I'm trying many of the tips in small
batches and would send out a feedback as soon as appropriate, gratefully, -
J.J.
On 2/14/08, Jacob Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just ran into this problem and would like to see if I could get some
> h
JJ
Dilute your fractions for this prep.
Do gradient elution in the future. Again dilute the fractions immediately.
Figure out a better buffer will be helpful.
Cheers,
Chun Luo, Ph.D.
The Protein Expert
Accelagen, Inc.
11585 Sorrento Valley Road, Suite 107
San Diego, CA 92121
Dear all,
I just ran into this problem and would like to see if I could get some
helpful tips before my protein completely crashes out.
I have a protein as 6His fusion and it remained bound to the Ni resin with
40 mM Imidazole wash (added to 1XPBS) but then was eluted off with 200 mM
(added to 1XP
BCA/CCP4 Summer School XV
Biochemistry Department and St. Edmund Hall, University of Oxford.
7th-12th September 2008.
Scope.
The BCA Summer School is a combined taught and practical course intended
primarily for students and researchers new to crystallography. Its aim
is to provide compre
The point where this restraint discussion regarding
counting of restraints seems to become murky imho, is when
it comes to 'independence' of restraints.
Ok - say only active and independent restraints (AIRs) count
in the determination of observation/parameter ratio,
where observations includes d
Bart
Yes, I think Peter's original question arose in the context of
predicting Rfree. For that we have to consider the *total* restraint
count separately from the total observation count, and provided each
restraint is independent of all other restraints it counts as one, and
similarly provided t
Thanks Ian,
I saw experimental observations and restraints (empirical observations)
as completely different but I now see they are just two different
sources of information that restrain the model parameters. So when you
are counting they can all get "one vote" as long as the observations are
Peter,
Sorry I re-read your e-mail & realised you're asking a slightly
different question from the one I answered. Of course you count the
restraints in your structure, not the ones in the dictionary, so in the
example you give there would be 4 not 1. Each bond, angle, torsion, VDW
contact, B-fa
Peter, Bart
Actually the restraint weight doesn't affect the restraint count one
iota and as far as counting is concerned each restraint has exactly one
'vote' in the count. However there is an important proviso: the
restraints must be completely independent to contribute fully to the
count. Sup
I really enjoyed the recent discussion of ncs coupling and bias on
ccp4bb, as usual. Although unlikely, the problem will be real in a
significant number of cases. At this time there is sufficient
computing power so that refinement calculations can be made with
several different test sets. In t
Hi Pete,
In your example it would count as 4 restraints, not constraints, and
certainly not 4 observations or 4 parameters. It is not clear to me how
to quantify the information content in restraints, it probably depends
on the type of restraint and surely on the weight. Maybe information
the
Hi,
The recent discussion on Rwork/Rfree ratio reminded me of something I was
wondering about (*). When counting constraints as observations for determining
the observation to parameter ratio, is each unique constraint counted, or each
time a given constraint is used. For example, if there ar
About to leave for 6 weeks - but try expanding map to P1 and using that
- SFALL only supports a limited set of spacegroups..
Eleanor
Dirk Kostrewa wrote:
Dear CCP4ers,
I've created an artificial map in C2 with MAPMAN and made sure that
the axis order and sampling is consistent with SFALL, wh
Would it be too much to ask that the person sending the summary email
would also put that (or equivalent information) in the wiki?
Esko
Quoting Kay Diederichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andreas Förster schrieb:
> > Hey Kay,
> >
> > I'm not even sure I see a problem with reposting. All ccp4 p
Andreas Förster schrieb:
Hey Kay,
I'm not even sure I see a problem with reposting. All ccp4 posts are
archived, and the archive is public. So, by posting to the list, you're
already implicitly consenting to having your comment made public. How
is this different from being included in the
Hey Kay,
I'm not even sure I see a problem with reposting. All ccp4 posts are
archived, and the archive is public. So, by posting to the list, you're
already implicitly consenting to having your comment made public. How
is this different from being included in the wiki?
That said, I think
Dear all,
For the second consecutive year, the School of Crystallography, Birkbeck
College, University of London is offering scholarships in association
with the Association of Commonwealth Universities. These scholarships
offer 100% fee waivers on our web based MSc in Structural Biology by
W3-Professor for Structural Biology - Head of the Helmholtz Department
of Structural Biology and a Junior (W1) Professorship
Dear Colleagues,
we are writing to inform you about exciting new job opportunities in a
newly established, independent structural biology laboratory. We would
appreciate if
mesters wrote:
> Sorry for the off-topic but can somebody recommend highly a sensitive
> RT-PCR machine for the thermofluor experiment (sypro orange).
> That would imply excitation below 500 nm (ideally 470) and detection
> at about 570 nm, right? I know several simple machines have a problem
> wit
Dear all,
one week ago the CCP4 community wiki at
http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/ccp4wiki/index.php/Main_Page
was announced. I had to learn the meaning of the word "slashdotted" on
that occasion (thanks Paul!).
In the meantime there have been a total of 3,037 page views, and 250
p
Dear CCP4ers,
I've created an artificial map in C2 with MAPMAN and made sure that
the axis order and sampling is consistent with SFALL, which I want to
use for calculating structure factors from this map. However, SFALL
(MODE SFCALC MAPIN) fails with the rather obscure error message:
"SFA
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 17:47:34 Laurent Maveyraud wrote:
> I am trying to read a CCP4 electron density map into turbo_frodo, without
> success. It seems that the mappage program that was distributed with
> turbo_frodo does not work on our system (Linux Mandrake) : it produces a
> segmentatio
Structural Studies on Human Proteins of Medical Relevance
Karolinska Institutet, Structural Genomics Consortium
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics
Web link: http://sgc.ki.se/jobs.html
Structural Biochemistry of Integral Membrane Proteins (2 positions)
We seek two talented researche
23 matches
Mail list logo