Am Freitag, 2. Mai 2025, 18:19:36 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieben Sie:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> >6480 ioctl(3, BLKSSZGET, [512]) = 0
> >6481 fadvise64(3, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_RANDOM) = 0
> >6482 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(0x2b, 0), ...}) = 0
> >64
--
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
gt; qemu-nbd.
>
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/catalyst.git/tree/targets/support/create-qcow2.sh#n96
>
> This worked fine for quite some time.
>
> Recently, it stopped working, there is no error message at all, but the
> command
> parted -s /dev/nbd0 mklabel gpt
> r
This worked fine for quite some time.
Recently, it stopped working, there is no error message at all, but the command
parted -s /dev/nbd0 mklabel gpt
returns 1.
If I run the same command outside the release automation manually, the return
code is 0 and
everything is fine.
I inserted strace t
> 2775MB primary ntfs 2 2780MB 7532MB 4752MB primary ext4
> boot 7532MB 8070MB 538MB Free Space(parted) align-check
> optimal 1
> Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Backtrace has 11 calls on
> stack: 11: /lib/i386-linux-g
Space(parted) align-check optimal 1
Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Backtrace has 11 calls on
stack: 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x51) [0xb76e0c21]
10: parted(+0xb424) [0x4c2424] 9: linux-gate.so.1(__kernel_rt_sigreturn+0)
[0xb775dd20] 8: /lib/i386-linux
yes this is it.But I can install Windows...I should re-partition my diskAnd this I didBut any longer the same errorSorryI never had this errorRegardsUdo16:31, 1. November 2021, "Brian C. Lane" :On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:25:17AM +, Hofer wrote: Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libpar
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 11:25:17AM +, Hofer wrote:
> Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2352 in
> function add_logical_part_metadata() failed.
This means that whatever tool created the partition on your disk didn't
leave enough space for the extended partition's
Hi
this is Udo
I've a problem by installation LM 20.2 Cinnamon
-
Before there was 20.1 running
-
This is a multiboot OS
WIN10/LM20
-
WIN10 is still running
This is the error
sorry , some words are in german
LM
able-device-mapper
>
> however, make gives me a compile error. Instead with this, everything is
> fine
>
> ./configure --without-readline --disable-debug --disable-nls
> --disable-shared --disable-device-mapper
>
> The difference is in
>
> -enable-discover-only
>
&g
made it :)
>
> Creating 4th partition ('60mib' '100%' ... Error: You requested a partition
> from 62,9MB to 105MB (sectors 122880..204799).
> The closest location we can manage is 62,9MB to 105MB (sectors
> 122881..204799).
When you use MiB as a unit you
--
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
MiB according to parted.
So it seems like the bug is still present in 3.4.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Inconsistent behavior creating partitions with 'Xmib' and 'X%' (off-
by-1 error?)
Date: zondag 22 augustus 2021, 19:59:06 CEST
From: Diederik de Haas
To: b
inimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x03f77810
DeviceBoot StartEnd Sectors Size Id Type
temp/parted-test.img1 8192 40959 32768 16M c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
temp/parted-test.img2 40960 81919 40960 20M 83 Linux
temp/parted-test
Hi all,
I am trying to compile parted 3.4 with the following configuration:
./configure --without-readline --disable-debug --disable-nls
--disable-shared --enable-discover-only --disable-device-mapper
however, make gives me a compile error. Instead with this, everything is
fine
./configure
Hi,
since i am forced to redirect everything that comes into the error
channel to the standard output channel, to avoid my error handling code
going rampage:
Can you please explain to me, why you send
"Information: You may need to update /etc/fstab."
as an error ?
Its normal beha
Closing this
--
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)
e visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (3.2)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and the following history of commands yo
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 04:04:58PM +0300, ПИван Петров wrote:
> Reason of this "message bug" is: search line with "###" !
>
> == Output =
> root@machine:/home/user# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb status=progress bs=128M
> dd: write
Reason of this "message bug" is: search line with "###" !
== Output =
root@machine:/home/user# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb status=progress bs=128M
dd: write error '/dev/sdb': No free space on device
9+0 got records
8+0 sent records
107
working with flash drives. trying to make a Win8.1 boot disk from iso (from
MS). able to write image but partition table not recognized on multiple
flash drives (16/32 GB) unable to set boot flag
e yesterday and having a hard time reproducing the problem.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, at 19:24, Phil Susi wrote:
> On 2/13/2018 1:33 PM, Alex March wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original message -
> > From: Alex March
> > To: bugs-par...@gnu.org
> > Subject: part
i've been in the reply-to-sender habit so long that i'm afraid that
it's become almost hard-wired but i will do my best. :) thanks for the
help and hope your day goes well.
On 02/14/2018 01:04 PM, Phil Susi wrote:
On 2/14/2018 3:57 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
i had previously gone into parted
On 2/14/2018 3:57 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> i had previously gone into parted and then used the select device
> command from there and the crash happened. when i tried the "(sudo)
> parted /dev/sde print" string it worked properly. i then started parted
> and tried to select sde and found it was alr
On 2/14/2018 3:31 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> sudo dd if=/dev/sde count=1 | hd
>
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 512 bytes copied, 0.000549976 s, 931 kB/s
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ||
> *
> 0200
Weird... but parted /dev/sde print crashes?
sudo dd if=/dev/sde count=1 | hd
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
512 bytes copied, 0.000549976 s, 931 kB/s
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
||
*
0200
On 02/14/2018 12:23 PM, Phil Susi wrote:
On 2/14/2018 3:22 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
no partition t
no partition table. i've not used parted before and wanted to only do
the non-destructive things that were available, like print and select
device and help. i've got another disc (sdh) with no partition table in
the same machine and it can be selected by parted without crashing. i
had selected
On 2/14/2018 3:22 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> no partition table. i've not used parted before and wanted to only do
> the non-destructive things that were available, like print and select
> device and help. i've got another disc (sdh) with no partition table in
> the same machine and it can be selecte
On 2/14/2018 2:36 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> chris@bas2:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sde
>
> Disk /dev/sde: 7.3 TiB, 8001563222016 bytes, 15628053168 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 byte
On 2/13/2018 1:33 PM, Alex March wrote:
>
>
> - Original message -
> From: Alex March
> To: bugs-par...@gnu.org
> Subject: parted 3.2: Error: FPE_INTDIV (Integer: divide by zero)[1]4833
> abort (core dumped)
> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:32:03 +
>
&g
On 2/12/2018 5:55 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> parted 3.2 error message 2/12/18 Ubuntu 16.04
>
> Assertion (max_size > 0) at ../../libparted/cs/constraint.c:71 in
> function ped_constraint_init() failed.
Can you provide the output of fdisk -l on this disk?
- Original message -
From: Alex March
To: bugs-par...@gnu.org
Subject: parted 3.2: Error: FPE_INTDIV (Integer: divide by zero)[1]4833
abort (core dumped)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:32:03 +
Hi,
Latest 3.2 version.
% sudo parted /dev/sdc unit co print unit s print
[sudo
parted 3.2 error message 2/12/18 Ubuntu 16.04
Assertion (max_size > 0) at ../../libparted/cs/constraint.c:71 in
function ped_constraint_init() failed.
sudo parted /dev/sde unit co print unit s print
Error: /dev/sde: unrecognised disk label
Model: ATA HGST HDN728080AL (scsi)
Disk /dev/
On 11/17/2017 4:13 AM, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> Here it is, in base64 format:
Thanks. It appears that you have some non printing characters in your
partition names. parted/table.c was using wcswidth() to check the width
of the name in characters, but this function returns -1 if there are non
pr
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:43:22AM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
> On 10/28/2017 11:35 PM, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> > On the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S tablet, "parted /dev/sda print" crashes
> > with an error such as:
> >
> > *** Error in `parted': reallo
On 10/28/2017 11:35 PM, Seth Finkelstein wrote:
> On the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S tablet, "parted /dev/sda print" crashes
> with an error such as:
>
> *** Error in `parted': realloc(): invalid next size: 0x55cf7d3f3200 ***
Can you run dd if=/dev/sda of=dump count=6
On the Samsung Galaxy TabPro S tablet, "parted /dev/sda print" crashes
with an error such as:
*** Error in `parted': realloc(): invalid next size: 0x55cf7d3f3200 ***
This is using clonezilla-live-20171024-artful-amd64.iso
http://clonezilla.org/downloads.php
root@artful:~# pa
> Thanks for making the effort to report this.
> I'm not sure who has control of the #parted channel
> on freenode -- I know I haven't ever used it.
Ok, I'm not sure either as I can't spot any operator there,
but the channel _is_ mentioned here:
https://www.gnu.org/software/parted/lists.shtml
So
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:54:47PM +0100, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While translating parted to Swedish I stumbled upon a typo
> in libparted, the attached patch fixes the issue. I hope that
> someone with commit rights sees this e-mail and has the
> opportunity to commit the patch.
>
n hfs error message
---
libparted/fs/r/hfs/cache.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/fs/r/hfs/cache.c b/libparted/fs/r/hfs/cache.c
index 68be366..03c2913 100644
--- a/libparted/fs/r/hfs/cache.c
+++ b/libparted/fs/r/hfs/cache.c
@@ -210,8 +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
It seems this was already fixed:
commit f5c628dd51c7d77ff939554425159ab6e8aef1c0
Author: Brian C. Lane
Date: Mon Jul 13 16:43:11 2015 -0700
parted: Fix crash with name command and no disklabel (#1226067)
A typo (the last I think) f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The patch is not correct because as a library, libparted can not
simply write directly to stderr; it must throw an exception instead.
In all probability the bug lies in parted itself, which should not be
calling ped_disk_get_partition on a NULL disk
From: Xi Lu
if forget create a partition, and execute:
`name 1 grub`
ped_disk_get_partition() will trigger an exception:
Assertion (disk != NULL)
---
libparted/disk.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libparted/disk.c b/libparted/disk.c
index fe82f44..9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/31/2014 12:47 AM, Марк Коренберг wrote:
> Sorry, I have checked in Gentoo. This bug was already fixed. How I
> can find when it was fixed (version, commit...)?
You can look through the git logs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.
Sorry, I have checked in Gentoo. This bug was already fixed. How I can
find when it was fixed (version, commit...)?
2014-01-31 GNU bug Tracking System :
> Your bug report
>
> #16566: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a min"
>
> which was filed a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/27/2014 3:27 AM, Марк Коренберг wrote:
> GNU Parted 2.1
Parted 2.1 is 5 releases and over 4 years old, please upgrade.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.ne
===
# LANG=C parted -a none /dev/loop0
GNU Parted 2.1
Using /dev/loop0
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) u s
(parted) mkpart primary 1MiB 1GiB
(parted) p
Model: (file)
Disk /dev/loop0: 41943040s
Sector size (logical/physical): 5
Tests: Ubuntu 13.10 compilation
.../configure --prefix=/usr --without-readline CFLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -Werror"
&& make
Signed-off-by: Doron Tsur
---
parted/ui.c | 15 ---
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/parted/ui.c b/parted/ui.c
index be93ea9..327cc93
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Closing since I can't reproduce this on 2.3 or higher.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSgptnAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75fDwIAJeylL/7K2tzhoCAVhAty4uH
oO
which are partitions on a disk. Example: /dev/sda4, /dev/sdb4 are PV's,
part of 1 VG, and then a single LV in the VG.
When I do a parted -l on the system is when it gives that error.
On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Russell Jones wrote:
> Thanks, but just upgrading past what is considered a stable release on a
> production server is not the best method of resolving the issue in my opinion.
>
> Is this message an actual error, or just a bug with the display of the
Thanks, but just upgrading past what is considered a stable release on a
production server is not the best method of resolving the issue in my
opinion.
Is this message an actual error, or just a bug with the display of the
partition information itself and nothing to be concerned about?
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/4/2013 3:45 PM, Russell Jones wrote:
> I have a 3.5TB logical volume made from two 1.75 TB partitions /
> physical volumes. The partitions are being created on CentOS 6.4
> with parted 2.1. Whenever I do a "parted -l" I get the following
> messag
Hi all,
I have a 3.5TB logical volume made from two 1.75 TB
partitions / physical volumes. The partitions are being created on
CentOS 6.4 with parted 2.1. Whenever I do a "parted -l" I get the
following message:
Error: partition length of 7518568448 sectors
exceeds the loop-parti
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:23:20PM +, yzn严哲南 wrote:
> Add:
>
> My disk sector size is 4095,and total capacity is 3TB.
> 发件人: yzn严哲南
> 发送时间: 2013年3月4日 23:59
> 收件人: yzn严哲南; 'bug-parted@gnu.org'
> 主题: 答复: Why parted error
>
> (parted) mklabel gpt
> mklabe
On Mar 4, 2013, at 7:55 AM, yzn严哲南 wrote:
> You should reboot now before
> making further changes.
> How to solve the problem?
Reboot. Or use partprobe.
Chris Murphy
Add:
My disk sector size is 4095,and total capacity is 3TB.
发件人: yzn严哲南
发送时间: 2013年3月4日 23:59
收件人: yzn严哲南; 'bug-parted@gnu.org'
主题: 答复: Why parted error
(parted) mklabel gpt
mklabel gpt
Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sda will be destroyed and all data on
this disk will be lo
(parted) mklabel gpt
mklabel gpt
Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sda will be destroyed and all data on
this disk will be lost. Do you want to continue?
Yes/No? yes
yes
Error: Partition(s) 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
I have a big usb3.0 storage disk
I input a command: mklabel gpt
But return an error message:
Error Partition(s) 16 have been written, but we have been unable to
inform the kernel of the change, probably because it/they are in use. As a
result, the old partition(s) will remain in use. You should
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:37:52PM -0700, Kleve wrote:
>
>
>
> there is a bug in GNU Parted Version (1.8.9) Assertion (cluster <
> fs_ubgi-> cluster_count + 2)at calc.c:378 in function
> fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.segmentation fault resize fat failed!
> Aborting! Please reboot.
That version o
there is a bug in GNU Parted Version (1.8.9) Assertion (cluster < fs_ubgi->
cluster_count + 2)at calc.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag()
failed.segmentation fault resize fat failed! Aborting! Please reboot.
| for po in `ls -1 ./*.pt_BR.po 2>/dev/null`; do \
| make $(basename ${po%.pt_BR.po}); \
| done
| Makefile:904: *** Recursive variable `mandir' references itself (eventually).
Stop.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter
--- parted-3.1/doc/po4a.mk.orig 2012-03-15 14:09:11.555831
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Keshav P R wrote:
>
>> Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image (with 140
>> entry gpt table created using gdisk) but the "make check" test fails (http://
>> paste2.org/p/1758285) . Whats wrong?
>
> Thanks for the report.
> The new script that's run b
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:26, Keshav P R wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:18, Keshav P R wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>>> Keshav P R wrote:
>>>
>>> > Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image
>>> (with 140
>>> > entry gpt table created
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:18, Keshav P R wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Keshav P R wrote:
>>
>> > Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image (with
>> 140
>> > entry gpt table created using gdisk) but the "make check" test fails
>> (http://
>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Keshav P R wrote:
>
> > Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image (with
> 140
> > entry gpt table created using gdisk) but the "make check" test fails
> (http://
> > paste2.org/p/1758285) . Whats wrong?
>
> Thanks for the
Keshav P R wrote:
> Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image (with 140
> entry gpt table created using gdisk) but the "make check" test fails (http://
> paste2.org/p/1758285) . Whats wrong?
Thanks for the report.
The new script that's run by that test uses Perl's Digest/C
Strange. Parted is able to open/print a manually created dd image (with 140
entry gpt table created using gdisk) but the "make check" test fails (
http://paste2.org/p/1758285) . Whats wrong?
Regards.
Keshav
Keshav P R wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 21:27, Keshav P R wrote:
>
> This bug seems to be fixed in parted-git
> (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/
> parted.git/commit/?id=5d12b6ef445b86e1815a029cc87bd26f58d63ad0).
>
> Regards.
>
> Keshav
>
> PS: What about the "Linux Unique
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 21:27, Keshav P R wrote:
> This bug seems to be fixed in parted-git (
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parted.git/commit/?id=5d12b6ef445b86e1815a029cc87bd26f58d63ad0
> ).
>
> Regards.
>
> Keshav
>
> PS: What about the "Linux Unique GUID" patch by Rod Smith?
>
I tested thi
This bug seems to be fixed in parted-git (
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/parted.git/commit/?id=5d12b6ef445b86e1815a029cc87bd26f58d63ad0
).
Regards.
Keshav
PS: What about the "Linux Unique GUID" patch by Rod Smith?
While working on a different GPT-related problem,
I was surprised to see an "Error: ...", yet to see that
parted exited successfully. This fixes that:
>From f0e91a88107642b17f1c7801d9326460924a1948 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:57:19 +0100
Su
Could this be the same issue I just posted about? Can you try applying the
patch referenced in the URL I posted yesterday?
--S
Quoting KESHAV P.R., who wrote the following on Thu, 29 Sep 2011:
Hi,
Parted 3.0.1-08c0 (GIT) (in Archlinux x86_64) gives error
"Primary and Backu
Hi,
Parted 3.0.1-08c0 (GIT) (in Archlinux x86_64) gives error
"Primary and Backup GPT table damaged, use Parted's Rescue option" for
a table created using gdisk 0.8.0.1 (GIT) in a 16 GB USB pendrive. Can
you debug the issue? Relevant files attached. Thanks in advance.
Regar
Edward wrote:
> edward@Ubuntu:/media$ gnome-format
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
>
> (gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: No object called:
> Error
edward@Ubuntu:/media$ gnome-format
(gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
(gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: Ignoring the separator setting
(gnome-format:14268): Gtk-WARNING **: No object called:
Error: Error opening /dev/sdc: Permission denied
Backtrace has 20
217 Aborted
/usr/sbin/bootloader-config --action remove-splash --kernel-version
$(uname -r)
error: %pre(plymouth-theme-pclinuxos-1.1.10-2pclos2011.i586) scriptlet
failed, exit status 134
error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping
plymouth-theme-pclinuxos-1.1.10-2pclos2011
A bug has b
From: Jim Meyering
* libparted/fs/amiga/Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add $(WARN_CFLAGS)
and $(WERROR_CFLAGS).
---
libparted/fs/amiga/Makefile.am |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/fs/amiga/Makefile.am b/libparted/fs/amiga/Makefile.am
index 599fec2..788
Coverity spotted these leaks:
>From 3259d570c7e58d317a823994200183501eff7092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:24:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] bsd: avoid NULL-deref-on-OOM and an error-path leak
* libparted/labels/bsd.c (bsd_read): Don't dereference
artedUtil(main+0x883) [0x804b033]
Jan 28 07:02:08 Hostd: 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x1b1c4f0c]
Jan 28 07:02:08 Hostd: 1: /sbin/partedUtil [0x80490b1]
Jan 28 07:02:08 Hostd: Error : A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer
to the web site of parted http://www.gnu.org/software/pa
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 16:49 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Thank you for the report.
> Two sectors (1KB) is almost enough.
> If you could send a little more, I'll take a look.
> If there are 4 partitions or fewer, 1.5KB is enough.
> If you have more than 4 partitions, then you
> might as well send se
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> I attached a USB enclosure containing a 160MB PATA disk formatted with
> an Apple Partition Map and got this error:
>
> --8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--
> GNU Parted 2.3
> Using /dev/sdc
> W
On 28 December 2010 01:59, Ram Dur wrote:
> Assertion (dev != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:185 in function
> ped_disk_new() failed.
Without knowing the exact version you were using, this information is
difficult to use.
Could you also report the version?
BR Håkon Løvdal
_
Assertion (dev != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:185 in function
ped_disk_new() failed.
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
I attached a USB enclosure containing a 160MB PATA disk formatted with
an Apple Partition Map and got this error:
--8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--
GNU Parted 2.3
Using /dev/sdc
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a lis
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 02:50:11PM -0400, zhaomingyang wrote:
> 2.1 and 2.2 have same error, I don't why. give me a hand, thank you.
>
>
> # ./configure
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> CC natmath.lo
[...]
> CC linu
2.1 and 2.2 have same error, I don't why. give me a hand, thank you.
# ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether
Hans de Goede wrote:
> We were checking for a return value of < 0 for dm_task_run errors, but
> dm_task_run returns 0 on error (and 1 on success). Thanks to Joe Jin
> for spotting this, see Red Hat bug 582907.
>
> * libparted/arch/linux.c(_dm_remove_map_name, _dm_is_part,
We were checking for a return value of < 0 for dm_task_run errors, but
dm_task_run returns 0 on error (and 1 on success). Thanks to Joe Jin
for spotting this, see Red Hat bug 582907.
* libparted/arch/linux.c(_dm_remove_map_name, _dm_is_part,
_dm_remove_parts, _dm_add_partition): dm_task_
Hi!
I have found the following bug with parted/gparted:
Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition.
even with commands only accessing the unit reading only:
parted /dev/sda unit s print
The device is partitioned. fdisk prints:
r...@sysresccd /root % fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 250.1
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:51:42AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> ...
> > If I then quiet parted I get
> > *** glibc detected *** parted: double free or corruption (out):
> > 0x7efff7afcab0 ***
> >
> > That is then only with parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-11.1.
> >
> >
> >
Rudy Gevaert wrote:
...
> If I then quiet parted I get
> *** glibc detected *** parted: double free or corruption (out):
> 0x7efff7afcab0 ***
>
> That is then only with parted 1.8.8.git.2008.03.24-11.1.
>
>
> So to conclude:
> 1) In my case, doing things with -s enabled doesn't work (either ver
(I tried to report through the website but this message gets rejected
as 'potential' spam :()
Hello,
I'm using FAI to automatically install machines. I'm getting the
above parted error in the following situation.
FAI is run in a Xen domU calling parted on a LVM volume
* libparted/disk.c(ped_disk_delete_all): Add missing update mode pop
call in error path.
---
libparted/disk.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/disk.c b/libparted/disk.c
index 476ece8..5ca5b74 100644
--- a/libparted/disk.c
+++ b/libparted/disk.c
From: Joel Granados Moreno
* libparted/disk.c(ped_disk_duplicate): Add missing update mode
pop call in error path.
---
libparted/disk.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libparted/disk.c b/libparted/disk.c
index 7660ee9..d14fe41 100644
--- a/libparted
of RAM
(and no swap since a live CD was used)
--- We suspect that the operation runs out of RAM at some point but
does not appear to report an error.
3) The resultant file system fails a Windows scandisk and dosfsck.
4) Problem exists with parted version 1.9.0 (and earlier)
Wo
GNU Parted version 1.8.7
Assertion (!disk->update_mode) at disk.c:419 in function
ped_disk_destroy() failed.
Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition.
Backtrace has 20 calls on stack:
20: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.7(ped_assert+0x3b) [0xb759c56b]
19: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.s
> Thats a shame :(.
Yes it is. But alas, I will have to take the time and try out later versions.
I was hoping that one or more of the developers would be able to respond to the
list and tell me.
> Well, I've been using parted for my partitioning needs for quite some
> time and it seem to wor
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joel Granados"
> To: "Nathan Boettcher"
> Cc: bug-parted@gnu.org
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:10:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: Re: error scripting parted using the mkfs c
: Monday, May 4, 2009 4:10:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: error scripting parted using the mkfs command
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:44:16PM -0700, Nathan Boettcher wrote:
> I have been trying to use parted to help automate the creation of a disk
> image that I can then write
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
