Sorry, I have checked in Gentoo. This bug was already fixed. How I can find when it was fixed (version, commit...)?
2014-01-31 GNU bug Tracking System <help-debb...@gnu.org>: > Your bug report > > #16566: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a min" > > which was filed against the parted package, has been closed. > > The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. > If you require more details, please reply to 16...@debbugs.gnu.org. > > -- > 16566: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16566 > GNU Bug Tracking System > Contact help-debb...@gnu.org with problems > > > ---------- Пересылаемое сообщение ---------- > From: Phillip Susi <ps...@ubuntu.com> > To: "Марк Коренберг" <socketp...@gmail.com>, 16566-d...@debbugs.gnu.org > Cc: > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:36:24 -0500 > Subject: Re: bug#16566: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a > min" > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/27/2014 3:27 AM, Марк Коренберг wrote: >> GNU Parted 2.1 > > Parted 2.1 is 5 releases and over 4 years old, please upgrade. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS6qm4AAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwKhgH/jKrKfkYZ4m7GLLkTvcSkgdw > qIde+DSRNk12Nz6AasXDCfWJyo6hh/7XigaAMxJNuzoBZ/D7x6MKsNKxHlSvdH3q > 4utCy1UXZ5phob+kWF33J52v/AMXcGulA1VgiCBarFaALPF0k6ax3G21c0sJ9HUi > CdVWKv1zx5TxTwwgilDOUfIRHSMs5+CZdihD5JePOIaZU2HGA6XeTMA9U7Gi+mDZ > Oa54CX3we049IYSjynGur1izS0mcZ6ZZ2QkOJeakle51Dq5qmyXmiJ32aUfO/lmE > w/rV9DMstKZWF/SJrbA4Amx+YXw9EB5Zb13Cz+sOfHKZX+uO0v/ovkpT7T5V68E= > =ndYm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ---------- Пересылаемое сообщение ---------- > From: "Марк Коренберг" <socketp...@gmail.com> > To: bug-parted@gnu.org > Cc: > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:27:02 +0600 > Subject: Parted off-by-one error when using "-a none" or "-a min" > =================================== > # LANG=C parted -a none /dev/loop0 > GNU Parted 2.1 > Using /dev/loop0 > Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. > (parted) u s > (parted) mkpart primary 1MiB 1GiB > (parted) p > Model: (file) > Disk /dev/loop0: 41943040s > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > > Number Start End Size Type File system Flags > 1 2048s 2097152s 2095105s primary > (parted) > =================================== > # LANG=C parted -a opt /dev/loop0 > GNU Parted 2.1 > Using /dev/loop0 > Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. > (parted) u s > (parted) mkpart primary 1MiB 1GiB > (parted) p > Model: (file) > Disk /dev/loop0: 41943040s > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > > Number Start End Size Type File system Flags > 1 2048s 2097151s 2095104s primary > (parted) > ======================================= > > So, I guess, for losetup device, Parted aligns to the border of the > page (4096 bytes) > > To make things easier, PLEASE interpret "END" parameter of mkpart > command as offset of the END of last accessible sector of this > partition. Today Parted interprets this parameter as offset of > BEGINNIG of last accessible sector in this partiton. > > > I think i'm not first who mention this behaviour. Please point me to > bug/documentation so. > > > -- > Segmentation fault > > > -- Segmentation fault
