On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Russell Jones <russell-l...@jonesmail.me> wrote:
> Thanks, but just upgrading past what is considered a stable release on a > production server is not the best method of resolving the issue in my opinion. > > Is this message an actual error, or just a bug with the display of the > partition information itself and nothing to be concerned about? It's a valid question. Although I'm curious about the use case. The only time I've partitioned an LV rather than directly formatting it, is when using the LV as a backing store for a qemu/kvm VM via virsh/virt-manager. However in that case, to access the partition map and activate the individual partitions before mounting them, I used kpartx -a. Chris Murphy
