Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

I don't see it. I setup the maintainer to BIT Team. Let me know if it works. Best regards, Dan Bart wrote: I do not have a clue. Isn't it possible to do that on the bugs page? Or on the projects overview page? When I am logged in I do not see any ! on those pages, but that might have to do wi

[Bit-team] [Bug 479178] Re: [enhancement] Possibility to select manual frequency for every x hours

This will help to some point where for a specific backup profile I'd choose the hour of the day for backups that don't need a higher frequency.. But for me I have many large files changing frequently during the day so I need frequent backups during the day. The hourly backup was fine but now somet

Re: [Bit-team] [Bug 479178] [NEW] [enhancement] Possibility to select manual frequency for every x hours

backintime uses cron so you can always edit your crontab to customise the scheduling. There is a bug in the current release called "Overzealous removal of crontab entries" which will knock out your custom cron lines, but a fix for that is coming in the next release. As for having more hourly optio

Re: [Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

The exact commands are logged in your messages log (Command "..." returns 0) Between " " is the command that is issued (it might be better to have a look in the syslog, as in messages the commands can be truncated. You can also run it from the command line: backintime -b than all the messages are a

Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

Argh it is good that they have a good and thorough security policy, but at the moment it is starting to be a bit annoying, however I am nearly there: I have now a lot more options and found the option however: Bug Supervisor: (Optional) (Choose… ) You cannot se

Re: [Bit-team] Changing importance bugs

Done :) Bart wrote: Argh it is good that they have a good and thorough security policy, but at the moment it is starting to be a bit annoying, however I am nearly there: I have now a lot more options and found the option however: Bug Supervisor: (Optional) (Choose…

[Bit-team] [Bug 455658] Re: [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files

I mean tracking all changes instead of "snapshot" concept. Receive notifications about file changes and instantly backup the modified version. -- [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455658 You received this bug notification beca

[Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

Excluding ".gvfs" actually resolved the issue for me. Before BiT I had rolled my own similar back up routine using hard links and rsync and had run into this exact same behavior. What I had discovered then was that rsync was bombing out on .gvfs (permission errors) before it finished running and b

[Bit-team] [Bug 406092] Re: Deleted Files are stored in snapshots forever

Hey this bug is turning into two: - the .gvfs problem -> lets continue that one in the default excluded folders bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/422132 - the problem of removing an included folder what leads to rudimentary ghost folders in the snapshots

[Bit-team] [Bug 480180] [NEW] Unpredictable behavior when BIT cannot write config file

Public bug reported: Due to a file system problem unrelated to BIT - the program could not write its config files. Once that happens unpredictable behavior is encountered (program freeze) Since this happens easily due to .gvfs files - program support is required. It is best to have the program

[Bit-team] [Bug 480180] Re: Unpredictable behavior when BIT cannot write config file

** Changed in: backintime Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => High -- Unpredictable behavior when BIT cannot write config file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team

[Bit-team] [Bug 422132] Re: default exclude patterns for users

As we changed the default not to exclude all hidden files, we can expect a lot of problems concerning .gvfs Should be excluded by default and perhaps should be given some extra attention, like question box when trying to remove this pattern Therefore I also changed the importance to high! f

[Bit-team] [Bug 455658] Re: [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files

** Changed in: backintime Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: backintime Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455658 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bit-team] [Bug 455658] Re: [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files

Nice idea, however changes more or less the whole concept... What to do then with files that you change a lot, how would implement a sort of smart-remove option not to clog your harddrive with all kinds of unnecessary versions... But I agree with you that this concept sounds nice... -- [enchans

[Bit-team] [Bug 480272] [NEW] [enhancement] return to default settings option

Public bug reported: It would be good if it was possible to restore default values with one push on a button (and a question afterwards), especially for the excluded folders and patterns ** Affects: backintime Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: backintime Importance

[Bit-team] [Bug 480391] [NEW] [enhancement] load existing backup settings

Public bug reported: use scenario: any situation where "Back in Time" needs to be installed -- and one wants to load pre-existing "Back in Time" snapshot information. Example: creating a "Back in Time" archive of entire hard- drive, reformatting the entire hard drive, installing new operating syst

[Bit-team] [Bug 435380] Re: Add a "pause backup" feature

i agree with this suggestion. it would be very useful to have both a PAUSE and a CANCEL option for snapshots in progress. -- Add a "pause backup" feature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In Time Team, which is subscribed to

[Bit-team] [Bug 480399] [NEW] [enhancement] different destinations for different sources

Public bug reported: BIT is great (thanks!), but the main limitation for my purposes is that it does not seem possible to specify different destinations for different sources. example: i have one set of files that i want to back up to one partition -- and another set of files i want to back up to

[Bit-team] [Bug 480391] Re: [enhancement] load existing backup settings

I totally agree with this issue. But I would go further for the solution. The problem is that the user has to know that he also has to backup the ~/.config/backintime folder But if he doesn't know that (like me 5 minutes ago) and a problem occurs, the Backintime GUI is not useful at all for him!

[Bit-team] [Bug 455658] Re: [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files

This is the timevault concept, different concept but also good i think. It must have a smart remove as Bart said. Maybe the concept can be chosen by the user in preferences? -- [enchansement] It woluld be great to track all changes to selected files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455658 You rec

[Bit-team] KDE GUI schedule

Hey guys, I'm updating the KDE GUI to have the hour of backup option that I implemented in Gnome (finally!). However, I'm running into a problem, can you guys do a quick check? If I set up a config file in the gnome GUI and set a schedule, i.e. not "Disabled", and then load the KDE GUI I'm not get

[Bit-team] [Bug 373572] Re: [enhancement]Provide timeline to browse through the snapshots

Common answer for bugd #373572 and #373546 A Sun developer has made an integration in nautlus with timeline for his backup program for ZFS filesystem. Why not reuse the code? http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/zfs_on_the_desktop_zfs -- [enhancement]Provide timeline to browse through the snapshot

[Bit-team] [Bug 373546] Re: [enhancement] Integrate Back in Time in Nautilus

Common answer for bugs #373572 and #373546 A Sun developer has made an integration in nautlus with timeline for his backup program for ZFS filesystem. Why not reuse the code? http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/zfs_on_the_desktop_zfs -- [enhancement] Integrate Back in Time in Nautilus https://bug