> OPENPYXL :- Read and Write only XLSX file. (No support for XLS)
>
We are using openpyxl in our product - mainly because we needed to *create*
xlsx files.
-Mandar
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
Hi,
There are a couple of options, for excel connectivity in Python.
XLRD :- Reading from XLS and XLSX files.
XLWT :- Writing to XLS files (currently no support for XLSX)
OPENPYXL :- Read and Write only XLSX file. (No support for XLS)
Regards,
Karthik
On Monday, 10 March 2014 5:21 PM, kona
Hi
For parsing .xls files with Python, I've used xlrd lib (
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd) quite extensively.
Let's you move around multiple sheets aswell and parse data easily.
Regards
Konark
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10 2014, Shashidhar Parag
On Mon, Mar 10 2014, Shashidhar Paragonda wrote:
> Hello python hackers
>
> I have a excel file which is .xls format. My requirement is: the
> excel file contains a manual test cases, in second column, I need to
> read a file and extract thekeywords like : Login, logout, click to
> optimize, enh
We are using TestComplete tool to do automation testing.
Automation testing script is generated using C#,
Main concern is we are trying to generate C# automation test script using
the manual test scripts.
For manual test scripts we wanted to follow common script format i.e we
thought of Gherkin fo
For what purpose are you trying to use C# Automation scripts?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Shashidhar Paragonda <
shashidha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, lettuce solved the requirement of doing automation testing.
> I have other requirement i.e I am using Python as scripting tool to perform
> t
Hi, lettuce solved the requirement of doing automation testing.
I have other requirement i.e I am using Python as scripting tool to perform
the automation script for C#.
Is there any other library which best supports to perform the C# automation.
---
Regards,
Shas
You could consider using Lettuce [http://lettuce.it/] . It is a BDD
framework in python. This could help you to build & maintain the automation
scripts efficiently in the long run. Hope this helps..
Regards,
jagan
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Shashidhar Paragonda <
shashidha...@gmail.com> w
Hi
>>> The main requirement is to build autamation script parsing the Gherkin
format.
>>> We planned to use Gherkin format to basically convert the test
use-cases.
>>> Everyone who does manual / automation test, will use Gherkin format to
generate the test use-cases, so that Gherkin becomes a commo
Hi,
Why do you want to write a parser for the Gherkin format ? If we can know
the underlying need, then may be We can suggest you more effectively.
Regards,
Jagan
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Shashidhar Paragonda <
shashidha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Python hackers
>
> >>> I wanted to wr
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar
> wrote:
>
> To update an element, just assign a value to it, e.g.,
> myelem.text = "New value"
> You can then save the modified XML to a new file.
> Please see http://infohost.nmt
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to parse an xml file, get to a spefic node, and
> set it to a different value and write it back to the file. What is the
> best way to do it ? The xml file can be a few hundred lines(with
> proper formattin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
> 2011/7/28 Venkatraman S :
> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract
> the
> > distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
> > would always suggest regexp. xml parsing is a pa
Thank you everybody for your input. It helped a lot in understanding the
logic i had to implement in the program. I am familiar with the concept of
regular expressions but in this case line breaks would have been an issue.
At the end, I did some more reading and browsed through examples and got the
At least I am not great at regular expressions. I agree that regex may
reduce the number of lines,.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:55 PM, mahendra N wrote:
> Fgt the link
>
> http://code.google.com/edu/languages/google-python-class/regular-expressions.html
>
> 2011/9/19 mahendra N
>
> > Have you t
Fgt the link
http://code.google.com/edu/languages/google-python-class/regular-expressions.html
2011/9/19 mahendra N
> Have you thought of using regular expressions?. It might make ur job
> easier.
>
> Checkout this link good explaination of reg exps.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Mahendra Naik
>
>
>
Have you thought of using regular expressions?. It might make ur job easier.
Checkout this link good explaination of reg exps.
Thanks and Regards,
Mahendra Naik
2011/9/18 Gopalakrishnan Subramani
> Senthil and Gora Mohanty pointed out whats wrong on the code.
>
> This is alternative option, no
Senthil and Gora Mohanty pointed out whats wrong on the code.
This is alternative option, not its best since I feel always good to parse
the file B based on file spec instead of the following approach.
file_a_lines = open('FileA.txt').readlines()
file_b_content = open('FileB.txt').read()
for l
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:26:34PM -0500, Ananya Sharma wrote:
>
> *File A-*
> >PSUB.GBD61H402FPT34:0-372
>
> *File B-*
> >PSUB.GBD61H402FPT34:0-372
> XX
> XX
>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Ananya Sharma wrote:
> The logic is that i have file A which has some names and file B which has
> values for each name in file A and some extra values. I want to make a
> script which gives me the values from file B corresponding to all the names
> given in file A
The logic is that i have file A which has some names and file B which has
values for each name in file A and some extra values. I want to make a
script which gives me the values from file B corresponding to all the names
given in file A. My files look like -
*File A-*
>PSUB.GBD61H402FPT34:0-372
>P
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Ananya Sharma wrote:
> I am trying to look up each value from file A and loop it through file B. As
> i already said that I am new in python programming so this is what I could
> come up with.
Um, the code is quite far from accomplishing that. While
I am sure that
I am trying to look up each value from file A and loop it through file B. As
i already said that I am new in python programming so this is what I could
come up with. And this is the output of an algorithm I use in my research so
its not a part of any homework assignment.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Ananya Sharma wrote:
[...]
Could you explain the logic that you are trying to use in the code
below, because it is not making much sense. Also, is this a
homework problem?
> *Script-*
> *
> *
> f1=open('fileA','r')
> f2=open('fileB','r')
> a=""
> b=""
> for n in
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Anand Balachandran Pillai writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> It is more subtler than that.
>>
>> List comprehensions are faster than map functions when
>> the latter needs to invoke a user-def
Anand Balachandran Pillai writes:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
[...]
> It is more subtler than that.
>
> List comprehensions are faster than map functions when
> the latter needs to invoke a user-defined function call or a lambda.
>
> Maps score over list comprehens
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Venkatraman S writes:
>
>
>> Hang around in #django or #python. The most elegant code that you
>> *should* write would invariably be pretty fast (am not ref to asm).
>
> I agree with you here. Pythonicity is best defined as what the
> exper
by using lxml...for example-:
from lxml import etree
content = etree.iterparse( *name of the xml file*, events=('start', 'end'))
for event, elem in content:
if elem.tag == 'distance':
print elem.text
Hope it will work..
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote:
> On 31-Jul-2011, at 11:33 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
>
> > A regex is the simplest IMHO, because you need not know the syntax of the
> > minidom parser.
> > But, again i have seen this quiet often that lack of knowledge of regexp
> has
> >
On 31-Jul-2011, at 11:33 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> A regex is the simplest IMHO, because you need not know the syntax of the
> minidom parser.
> But, again i have seen this quiet often that lack of knowledge of regexp has
> led people to other solutions (the grapes are sour!)
In the eternal word
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Dhananjay Nene writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > re.search("\s*(\d+)\s*",data).group(1)
> >
> > would appear to be the most succinct and quite fast. Adjust for
> whitespace
> > as and if necessary.
>
> Whitespace (including newlines), mixed cases
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:57 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
> > xml parsing in the case when all that you need from the string is a
> simple
> > numeric value(not a string), then good luck; unlike esr i will not
> use
> > adjectives; but i would not use your code either.
> >
>
> To be fair
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
> > Hang around in #django or #python. The most elegant code that you
> *should*
> > write would invariably be pretty fast (am not ref to asm).
>
> That doesn't mean that any code that is faster is elegant.
>
> IIRC, in python, map function r
> Hang around in #django or #python. The most elegant code that you *should*
> write would invariably be pretty fast (am not ref to asm).
That doesn't mean that any code that is faster is elegant.
IIRC, in python, map function runs slightly faster than list
comprehensions, but list comprehensions
Venkatraman S writes:
[...]
> A regex is the simplest IMHO, because you need not know the syntax of the
> minidom parser.
Oh come on. This sounds like doing it the wrong way because you're not
going to spend time reading the docs and then using performance as a
cover for the laziness.
[...]
Dhananjay Nene writes:
[...]
> re.search("\s*(\d+)\s*",data).group(1)
>
> would appear to be the most succinct and quite fast. Adjust for whitespace
> as and if necessary.
Whitespace (including newlines), mixed cases etc.
[...]
> As far as optimisation goes - I can see at least 3 options
>
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Dhananjay Nene
wrote:
> a. the minidom performance is acceptable - no further optimisation required
> b. minidom performance is not acceptable - try the regex one
> c. python library performance is not acceptable - switch to 'c'
>
> I can imagine people starting w
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> hi,
>
> here is a simplified version of an xml file:
>
>
>
>
>
>CloudMade
>
>http://maps.cloudmade.com";>
>
>
>h
Anand Balachandran Pillai writes:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
[...]
> To be fair here, I think what he is saying is that Kenneth's problem
> (getting at the particular value) can be solved by using an aptly
> written regular expression which might be the fastest - n
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> Noufal,
>
> I have nothing more to say than this(as i see some tangential replies which
> i am not interested in substantiating - for eg, i never suggested to use a
> regexp based parser - a regexp based xml parser is different from using 'a
Venkatraman S writes:
[...]
> Read my replies properly. Read my assumptions properly w.r.t the xml
> structure and the requested value in the xml. Read the link that you
> have pasted again. If possible, read the comments in the link
> shared(from esr) again. Once done, think twice and tell me
Noufal,
I have nothing more to say than this(as i see some tangential replies which
i am not interested in substantiating - for eg, i never suggested to use a
regexp based parser - a regexp based xml parser is different from using 'a'
regexp on a string!) :
Read my replies properly. Read my a
> Along the same lines...the problems are more when xml is concerned, for even
> if some other tag is malformed, then the
> whole document is 'gone'.
Well, then - the API is broken and is basically violating the TOS for
the API (which I would at a minimum expect to return valid output or
the approp
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
>> minidom is the fastest solution if you consider the programmer time
>> instead of developer time. Minidom is available in standard library,
>> you don't have to add another dependency and worry about PyPI
>> downtimes and lxml compila
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> IMHO, regexps are much more powerful and fault tolerant than XML parsing.
> XMLs are brittle.
Did you mean parsing XML using Regular Expressions is "more powerful
and fault tolerant" than using a XML parser?
Regards,
BG
--
Baishampayan Gh
Venkatraman S writes:
> n Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
>> I agree and I try my best to do the same thing. However, I differentiate
>> between micro optimsations like rewriting parts in C and XML and top
>> level optimisations like good design and the right data structur
n Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> I agree and I try my best to do the same thing. However, I differentiate
> between micro optimsations like rewriting parts in C and XML and top
> level optimisations like good design and the right data structures.
>
>
Using regexp is micro
+1
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Sidu Ponnappa wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> > Venkatraman S writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> > I am a speed-maniac and crave for speed; so if the assumption is
+1.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> Venkatraman S writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>>
>>> > I am a speed-maniac and crave for speed; so if the assumption is
>>> > valid, i can vouch for the fact that regexp would be faster and neater
Venkatraman S writes:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
>> > I am a speed-maniac and crave for speed; so if the assumption is
>> > valid, i can vouch for the fact that regexp would be faster and neater
>> > solution. I have done some speed experiments in past on this (r
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
> > I am a speed-maniac and crave for speed; so if the assumption is
> > valid, i can vouch for the fact that regexp would be faster and neater
> > solution. I have done some speed experiments in past on this (results
> > of which i do not h
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> And I'm telling you that even a slight change to the tag - an extra
> space, a newline, a new attribute, a change in case or any such thing
> which doesn't modify it's meaning as far as the XML snippet is concerned
> will break your rege
Venkatraman S writes:
[...]
> Sigh! Again, guys, i am referring to regexp when all you need is some
> number within a tag! If the content of that tag was text, i would
> have never suggested this solution.
[...]
And I'm telling you that even a slight change to the tag - an extra
space, a newli
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:
>
> > Well, i have clearly mentioned my assumptions - i.e, when you treat
> > the XML as a 'string' and do not want to retrieve anything else in a
> > 'structured manner'.
>
>
> If the data is structured, it makes sense to exploit that struc
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Venkatraman S :
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu >wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/7/28 Venkatraman S :
> >> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to
> extract
> >> the
> >> > distance and as
Venkatraman S writes:
[...]
> Well, i have clearly mentioned my assumptions - i.e, when you treat
> the XML as a 'string' and do not want to retrieve anything else in a
> 'structured manner'.
If the data is structured, it makes sense to exploit that structure and
use a proper solution.
> I a
2011/7/29 Baishampayan Ghose :
>> minidom is the fastest solution if you consider the programmer time
>> instead of developer time. Minidom is available in standard library,
>> you don't have to add another dependency and worry about PyPI
>> downtimes and lxml compilations failures.
>
> FWIW, Elem
2011/7/29 Venkatraman S :
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/7/28 Venkatraman S :
>> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract
>> the
>> > distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
>> > would alway
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
> 2011/7/28 Venkatraman S :
> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract
> the
> > distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
> > would always suggest regexp. xml parsing is a pa
> minidom is the fastest solution if you consider the programmer time
> instead of developer time. Minidom is available in standard library,
> you don't have to add another dependency and worry about PyPI
> downtimes and lxml compilations failures.
FWIW, ElementTree is a part of the standard libr
2011/7/28 Venkatraman S :
> parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract the
> distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
> would always suggest regexp. xml parsing is a pain.
regexp is a bad solution to parse xml.
minidom is the fastest s
Hi,
check and try pyparsing module... U could do it so simple:)
regards,
joseph
On 7/29/11, Ramdas S wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Venkatraman S
>> wrote:
>> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just w
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Venkatraman S
> wrote:
> > parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract
> the
> > distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
> > would always suggest
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract the
> distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
> would always suggest regexp. xml parsing is a pain.
[...]
Strongly disagree. IMHO, reg
parsing using minidom is one of the slowest. if you just want to extract the
distance and assuming that it(the tag) will always be consistent, then i
would always suggest regexp. xml parsing is a pain.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
htt
If you're doing this repeatedly, you may want to just delegate to a
native XPath implementation. I haven't done much Python, so I can't
comment on your choices, but in Ruby I'd simply hand off to libXML
using Nokogiri. This approach should be a whole lot faster, but I'd
advise benchmarking first be
You can try beautifulsoup, recommended for python/XML Parsing.
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:33 +0530, Anand Chitipothu wrote:
> > I want to get the value of the distance element - 1489. What is the
> > simplest way of doing this?
>
> >>> from xml.dom import minidom
> >>> dom = minidom.parseString(x)
> >>> dom.getElementsByTagName("distance")[0].childNodes[0].node
> here is a simplified version of an xml file:
>
>
>
>
>
> CloudMade
>
> http://maps.cloudmade.com";>
>
>
> http://cloudmade.com/faq#license
>
> 2
2011/7/28 Kenneth Gonsalves :
> hi,
>
> here is a simplified version of an xml file:
>
>
>
>
>
> CloudMade
>
> http://maps.cloudmade.com";>
>
>
> http://cloudmade.com/faq#licens
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> grep or regexp?
>
> -V
> ___
> BangPypers mailing list
> BangPypers@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
>
can write an Xml parsing query
--
Ramdas S
+91 9342 583 065
Using xpath such as:
/gpx/extensions/distance(:text)
?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
> grep or regexp?
>
> -V
> ___
> BangPypers mailing list
> BangPypers@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
>
-
grep or regexp?
-V
___
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Vasudevan N wrote:
> The simplest way would be to use recursive calls.
>
Vasu,
a. That could still entail a loop on a files per directory basis
b. If you avoid the loop and recurse on a per file (eg by shaving the head
off the sequence and passing on the tail), t
The simplest way would be to use recursive calls.
Thanks,
Vasu
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Nitin Kumar wrote:
> hi all,
>
> is there any simple way where a can parse into directory and subdirectories
> to get the detail of files and count.
>
> or do i need to use looping and other function
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:26 +0530, Asokan Pichai wrote:
> > On 18 November 2010 09:35, Nitin Kumar wrote:
> > > hi all,
> > >
> > > is there any simple way where a can parse into directory and
> > subdirectories
> > > to get the detail
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:46:47AM +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> >
> > Check if os.walk() is useful.
>
> but that is looping - which he does not want.
Then he can wrap python over 'find -type f |wc -l'
- Provided he is on POSIX and wants to just count the files.
os.system('find -type f |wc
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:26 +0530, Asokan Pichai wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 09:35, Nitin Kumar wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > is there any simple way where a can parse into directory and
> subdirectories
> > to get the detail of files and count.
>
> Check if os.walk() is useful.
but that is loopi
On 18 November 2010 09:35, Nitin Kumar wrote:
> hi all,
>
> is there any simple way where a can parse into directory and subdirectories
> to get the detail of files and count.
Check if os.walk() is useful.
--
Asokan Pichai
*---*
We will find a way. Or, make one. (Hannibal)
__
79 matches
Mail list logo
