Dhananjay Nene <dhananjay.n...@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> re.search("<distance>\s*(\d+)\s*</distance>",data).group(1)
>
> would appear to be the most succinct and quite fast. Adjust for whitespace
> as and if necessary.
Whitespace (including newlines), mixed cases etc.
[...]
> As far as optimisation goes - I can see at least 3 options
>
> a. the minidom performance is acceptable - no further optimisation required
> b. minidom performance is not acceptable - try the regex one
> c. python library performance is not acceptable - switch to 'c'
I'd switch b and c. If elementree is not fast enough, I'd switch to
celementree and if that's not fast enough, I'd try some hand parsing.
> I can imagine people starting with a and then deciding to move along
> the path a->b->c if and as necessary. I believe starting with b risks
> obfuscating code (imo regex is obfuscated compared to xml nodes -
> YMMV)
As someone who messed with perl for a long time, I can attest to their
power an unmaintainability. I stay away from them unless I really need
them. But yes, people like Larry Wall seem to think in a fundamentally
different way so YMMV.
[...]
--
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
I tripped over a hole that was sticking up out of the ground.
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
