Ralf Gross wrote:
> Bob Hetzel schrieb:
>> My suggestion is to try upgrading your server to 3.0.2. You won't need to
>> upgrade all your FD's. Since I went through that, the things that used to
>> hang bacula in my environment (at exactly the same place you describe) are
>> fixed.
> 3.0.2 is
m the
backports archive.
Grüße,
Sven Hartge.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.source
On 01.10.2016 16:51, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
> It seems weird that the bacula package in Debian and Ubuntu, et al, is
> broken and no one has noticed (checked Debian bug database). I know
> Debian has been on 5.x in the stable release for years (still is). It's
> possible that 7.0.5 got packaged
On 02.10.2016 09:08, Hankins, Jonathan wrote:
> Even though it's fixed in the 7.4.x from Ubuntu (probably in debian
> too), if it's indeed broken in debian, I'm going to ask if they can
> release an update to their 7.0.5 package in testing, so that people who
> track that, or distros that are deri
Um 12:03 Uhr am 02.10.16 schrieb Jan Martin:
> Well, if not Debian, maybe we can interest Ubuntu in fixing the 7.0.5
> bacula in their 16.04 distribution, since it's an LTS version. That
> would help those distros that inherit from Ubuntu, like Mint, maybe?
No need to do this, there is already
On 12.03.2017 14:54, Richard wrote:
> Looking back through all the messages in this thread, it appears that
> you have two problems. One is that you can't connect to the director
> daemon:
> The other is your db setup/access:
Both problems will be related. He cannot connect to the director with
On 12.03.2017 17:57, Richard wrote:
> Date: Sunday, March 12, 2017 17:33:40 +0100 From: "Erik P. Olsen"
>
>> On 2017-03-12 at 15:31:35 Sven Hartge wrote:
>>> First step should be to fix the database so that the director
>>> daemon starts correctly an
On 10.07.2017 13:41, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> If the Debian release supports installation of older OpenSSLs, please
> that as a solution, otherwise, I suspect that it will take some time --
> unless someone comes up with a patch, in which case, I will attempt to
> hire that person :-)
Debian 8/Jessi
On 23.08.2017 18:20, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
> So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with
> newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible?
I just checked and the current in-development version of the
Debian-official packages of 9.0.3 compile in a Je
On 27.08.2017 14:42, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hello, Carsten,
>
So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with
newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible?
>>>
>>> I just checked and the current in-development version of the
>>> Debian-official
On 30.08.2017 15:19, christian.garl...@cg-networks.de wrote:
> We never had such a problem before the upgrade, so we are wondering what
> could be the reason for that.
Could you please add
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug/ stretch-debug main contrib non-free
to your source.list and insta
On 20.12.2017 21:26, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> libbaccats.so -> /etc/alternatives/libbaccats.so
> libbaccats-7.4.4.so -> /etc/alternatives/libbaccats-7.4.4.so
> libbaccats-mysql.so -> libbaccats-mysql-7.4.4.so
> libbaccats-stub.so -> libbaccats-stub-7.4.4.so
>
> which allows the symlinks in /etc/al
On 24.12.2017 14:34, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 24.12.2017 um 13:51 schrieb Sven Hartge:
>> On 20.12.2017 21:26, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>> libbaccats.so -> /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql.so
>>> libbaccats-7.4.4.so -> /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-7.4.4.so
>>
On 24.12.2017 18:43, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> There's nothing private about it, it is installed by the RPM that way.
By "private" I meant: it isn't really a library to be used by external
3rd party tools like for example libcrypto or libmysqlclient is but
rather a library only used internally by b
On 29.12.2017 23:22, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
> I mount me Free ESXI 6.5 Server, to /mnt/vmware/ but it seem that
> Bacula can't backup running machines, it's this true?
Yes, but this is no limitation of Bacula but a restriction imposed by
ESX. Files of running VMs are locked and can't be accessed
On 30.12.2017 00:53, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> I use both ways, (a) and (b), in parallel. I use a product called Veeam
> which specializes in VM backup for snapshot based image backups mainly
> for disaster recovery. I also do file level backups of important data
> from within the VMs to be able to
On 04.01.2018 12:21, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> 2017-12-30 1:40 GMT+01:00 Sven Hartge <mailto:s...@svenhartge.de>>:
> On 30.12.2017 00:53, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > I use both ways, (a) and (b), in parallel. I use a product called Veeam
> > which s
On 12.01.2018 18:47, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I am not sure who's makefile you are referring to, but the Bacula
> project has never used the -Wdeprecated option in any of its makes or
> builds.
No, but it uses "-Wall".
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 13.02.2018 13:13, jesus moreno wrote:
> I have a Debian squeeze server with bacula-fd 5.0.3. If I try upgrade to
> bacula-fd 9.0.6, the system show the next errors, when i run "make":
openssl in Squeeze is *way* to old for Bacula 9.0.6. You need at least
openssl-1.0.0.
Debian Wheezy is the ol
On 20.02.2018 10:28, jesus moreno wrote:
> I have compiled bacula client 7.4.7. in Debian Squeeze, without problem.
Bacula-7.4 is not a problem, but Bacula 9.0.6 will not work, because the
support for OpenSSL <1.0.0 was removed between 9.0.5 and 9.0.6.
Grüße,
Sven.
-
On 02.05.2018 02:07, Matt Weatherford wrote:
> Q: Does the Bacula server version 7.4.4 support backing up a client
> running bacula client 9.0.7 ?
No.
> Q: What else can I look for in order to debug this client?
Upgrade to the Bacula version 9.0.6 (soon 9.0.7) in stretch-backports.
This wil
On 05.05.2018 21:07, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
> All is working now, By the way, I wonder if the sql-mode change was
> necessary, the update_mysql_table has a whole bunch of DROP DEFAULT for
> the time and date columns for Mysql 5.7.
All I can say is: the packages Ubuntu pulled in from Debian are not
On 07.05.2018 07:07, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> FYI: Bacula Systems sponsored this new web site to help bring the
> project web site up to current "standards".
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you.
Well, takes 8MB and ~8s to fully load (with another 6MB in the next 10
seconds) over a 1GBit/s conne
On 17.05.2018 22:05, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> I have installed Bacula and Baculum on Debian wheezy but seem to be
> missing the jsons (/usr/sbin/bsdjson etc.).
Debian Wheezy will be out of Long Term Support in a few days (End of
May). You really really should upgrade all the way to Debian Stretch
On 23.05.2018 11:52, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> What version of Bacula is currently provided through apt-get?
Debian provides 7.4.4 in the native Stretch repository and 9.0.7 via
stretch-backports:
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/bacula
https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch-backport
Um 16:40 Uhr am 26.05.18 schrieb Dan Langille:
>> On May 23, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
>> This will seem a dumb question to the experienced Bacula user. I would
>> prefer to use mysql rather than the default sqlite. During installation
>> (Debian Stretch repo, Bacula v7.4.4) I sa
On 10/6/18 5:42 PM, Welington R. Braga wrote:
> Can anyone the same scenery to help me?
Older versions of the FD will always work with newer SDs and DIRs, so
you will be fine.
Some special features do not work with older FDs but backup and restore
will work in all cases.
Grüße,
Sven.
signatu
On 09.10.18 14:26, krashoverr...@free.fr wrote:
> I'm having a problem on a virtualized Debian 9 server where i want to install
> bacula (7.4.4)
> I'm not able to start the SD, while FD and DIR are OK
>
> When I try to start it with _systemd start bacula-sd_, i'm getting the
> following
>
> Oc
On 10.10.18 08:35, krashoverr...@free.fr wrote:
> I've installed like 5/6 bacula solutions for now, and all of them worked as
> you say, out of the box, all of them installed from Debian repository
> I just don't understand where the problem is from, and have no idea where to
> find more debug
On 10.10.18 09:07, Miguel Gutiérrez Páez wrote:
> Hi, just only an idea; what about selinux?
Not on Debian.
Unless Thibault has done some very strange things to his system.
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Bacul
On 27.12.18 20:50, Dante F. B. Colò wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a s3 cloud storage on Bacula Storage Daemon, is
> there any extra dependencies necessary on the system to build Bacula
> with the S3 plugin ? I already compiled and installed but the
> bacula-sd process dies when Bacula tries to co
On 28.12.18 19:07, Dante F. B. Colò wrote:
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> In my case m using CentOS 7 , i tried compiled Bacula with libs3
> available on epel repository which is even older than this branch you
> mencioned but it fails to build , i''l try with the version available on
> your repo.
On 31.12.18 20:47, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Sven's libs3 is surely perfectly OK, but if you want the one that Bacula
> uses, please read the 9.4.1 release notes,
> as you might want to download the Bacula version which is in the
> downloads directory on bacula.org. Link provided
> in the release not
On 31.12.18 20:24, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, MariaDB is supposed to be MySQL compatible, but it is not really.
> The first time that I installed MariaDB over MySQL (with lots of
> problems -- best to remove MySQL and the DB first), I ran the Bacula
> regression tests and MariaDB failed with a fa
On 08.01.19 14:45, Alípio Luiz wrote:
> 08-Jan 09:44 SRVBACKUP-dir JobId 3954: Error: bdb.h:140 bdb.h:140 update
> UPDATE Media SET
> VolJobs=1,VolFiles=0,VolBlocks=52001,VolBytes=3354668902,VolABytes=0,VolHoleBytes=0,VolHoles=0,VolMounts=1,VolErrors=0,VolWrites=52002,MaxVolBytes=0,VolStatus='Used
On 21.02.19 01:09, Jose Alberto wrote:
> The Pool A where only Linux or Unix are stored. arrives cap 6TB to be
> FULL, this seems fine. But the Pool B where only WindowsServers is saved
> only gets to 2TB to get FULL what I see is not normal.
Maybe your Windows systems don't deliver the data fast
On 21.02.19 19:31, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote:
> # service bacula-sd status
> ● bacula-sd.service - LSB: Start Bacula Storage daemon at boot time
> Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/bacula-sd; generated; vendor preset:
> enabled)
> Active: active (exited) since Thu 2019-02-21 10:17:45 +
On 22.02.19 10:06, Yılmaz Bilgili via Bacula-users wrote:
> 22.02.2019 10:14 tarihinde Sven Hartge yazdı:
>> Why not try the Debian packages? bacula-9.4.2 is available via
>> stretch-backports.
>
> I thought packages in the script are official Debian packages too. I
>
On 28.02.19 17:17, Hodges wrote:
> When I try to start bacula in systemd I get a 'failed' message saying
> unit bacula-director.service is masked
>
> Does this matter - I guess so. What to do about it? I have just
> installed bacula 9.4.2 from the debian repository into Debian 10 and am
> trying
On 28.02.19 17:59, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 28.02.19 17:17, Hodges wrote:
>
>> When I try to start bacula in systemd I get a 'failed' message saying
>> unit bacula-director.service is masked
>>
>> Does this matter - I guess so. What to do about it? I have
On 03.03.19 16:00, Pedro Oliveira wrote:
> https://nonhazardo.us/tape/storage/udev/2016/03/14/udev-persistent-tape-drive-naming.html
This is all well and fine, but only talks about /dev/stX and /dev/nstX.
But persitently naming the tape devices is not the question here.
The real question is on h
On 03.03.19 16:40, William Muriithi wrote:
> Thanks for the link. I actually looked at it before Hartge responded and
> funny enough came to the same conclusion. The info maps the tape nicely but
> I don't get enough info from udev to do the dame with autochanger.
>
> I only get this:
>
> [r
On 03.03.19 18:02, William Muriithi wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>> What version is your mtx?
> Its the default that is shipped with RHEL 7.
>
> [root@eng-backup01 ~]# rpm -qa | grep mtx
> mtx-1.3.12-14.el7.x86_64
1.3.12 is the latest mtx version available.
The code triggering here is in scsi_linux.c:
#i
On 29.04.19 20:57, Josip Deanovic wrote:
> It's not that SQLite is bad or does not have the needed capabilities
> but it simply adds to the complexity of the source and maintenance of
> bacula features.
Also besides Carsten Leonhardt and me from Debian nobody has been
testing or even maintaining
On 28.06.19 17:32, Antonino Balsamo wrote:
> I'm running bacula 9.4.2 on stretch with debian packages from
> stretch-backports. I've added the cloud plugin from the Bacula package
> and I got the following error:
>
> JobId 2: Fatal error: cloud_dev.c:690 Could not open Cloud driver type=1
> for D
On 30.06.19 14:21, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> The Bacula project provides the correct libs3 package at
>
> https://www.bacula.org/downloads/libs3-20181010.tar.gz
>
> Normally when building, you download the .tar.gz file, detar it, build
> the package then make sure your packaging uses the special ver
On 30.06.19 16:57, Sven Hartge wrote:
> We would need to ship the special libs3 either as embedded code inside
> the Bacula source package or package it as a separate libs3-bacula
> package. Both will get an instant veto from the Security Team and the
> Release Managers. (Debian
On 01.07.19 13:11, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Yes, this is a problem. I remember we discussed libs3 some time ago,
> but I did not realize that it has a number of security issues.
I am no C/C++ wizard but just the fact that I need to disable about all
checks and warnings a modern compiler has to even
On 04.07.19 12:24, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> I just upgraded my bacula dir/sd server to debian buster and the update
> messages told me, sqlite3 would no longer be supported by bacula and a
> conversation would be recommended.
>
> PS: Since the official release of buster is imminent, I suppose t
On 20.09.19 12:29, Jose Alberto wrote:
> Bacula 9.X run on Debian 10 Buster?
Bacula 9.4.4 is available from the normal Debian Buster repositories.
Newer versions will be available (when released) via the Debian
Backports repositories.
Grüße,
Sven
(Debian Bacula Co-Maintainer)
signature.
On 11.12.19 12:17, gregor.bu...@gmx.de wrote:
> I want to try bacula on an debian buster system. But there aren't
> packages for buster available now?
There are official Debian packages available:
https://packages.debian.org/buster/bacula
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On 27.02.20 17:42, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> czw., 27 lut 2020 o 17:38 Sven Hartge <mailto:s...@svenhartge.de>> napisał(a):
>
> On 27.02.20 15:57, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>
> > Does Debian distribute any other Docker container ima
On 29.04.20 17:27, Markku Leiniö wrote:
> Hi, what is the recommended method to install Bacula Community version
> (latest 9.6.3) on Debian 10 Buster or Ubuntu 20.04? Neither of those
> have 9.6.x in the distributions' own repos (they have 9.4.2), and the
> community repo for Bacula does not have
On 29.04.20 17:27, Markku Leiniö wrote:
> Hi, what is the recommended method to install Bacula Community version
> (latest 9.6.3) on Debian 10 Buster or Ubuntu 20.04? Neither of those
> have 9.6.x in the distributions' own repos (they have 9.4.2), and the
> community repo for Bacula does not have
On 06.05.20 00:08, Jose Alberto wrote:
> Why bdirjson is not available in repo oficial Debian?
bdirjson is available in the Debians official packages:
bacula-common: /usr/lib/bacula/bdirjson
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On 09.05.20 22:48, r0...@nxlplyx.com wrote:
> It is the S3 modules that I need. This may help explain why I have not
> been able to get the S3 module of Bacula 9.6.3 to work in for Ubuntu 18.04.
To get the S3 driver working, you need the special libs3 provided by
Bacula systems. The libs3 includ
On 10.05.20 15:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I agree with Sven, libs3 is a big disaster. It works well but the
> author abandoned it, and many things have changed since then. For the
> moment, we have a version that works with AWS (don't expect it to work
> with a number of other S3 implementations,
On 18.05.20 18:25, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> I upgraded my server to Debian Buster (10) and took the opportunity to
> upgrade Bacula to the repo version (9.4.2). I retained my existing
> /etc/bacula/*.conf files.
>
> I had no luck getting the services to start (exited with error)
What errors?
>
On 19.05.20 17:27, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
The correct permissions for a Debian/Ubuntu system are as follows:
> bacula-dir.conf 755 bacula:bacula
640 bacula:bacula
> bacula-sd.conf 755 bacula:bacula
640 bacula:bacula
> bacula-fd.conf 755 root:bacula
640 root:root
> /var/lib/bacula/ 755 root:
(Please don't Cc: me on mails.)
On 30.05.20 19:31, r0...@nxlplyx.com wrote:
> ---
> $ make deb
> build/obj/request.do: Compiling dynamic object
> src/request.c: In function ‘request_curl_code_to_status’:
> src/request.c:1709:5: error: duplicate case value
> case CURLE
On 31.05.20 02:00, r0...@nxlplyx.com wrote:
> I am trying to compile the S3 module for Bacula 9.6.3 on a new install of
> Debian 10.
>
> That would be the source file: 'libs3-20181010.tar.gz'
>
> I unzip it, it extracts to its own directory. I cd to the directory, and
> follow the instruction
On 31.05.20 14:06, r0...@nxlplyx.com wrote:
> Unfortunately there are now four(4) new errors, all appearing to be
> related to the strncat function.
>
> I don't suppose there is a patch for this?
>
> -
>
> $ make deb
> build/obj/request.do: Compiling dynamic object
> src/request.c: In funct
r0...@nxlplyx.com wrote:
> Thank you. The patches have now solved the both the duplicate case
> statements and the strncat errors.
> HOWEVER, I am now getting a missing stddef.h error.
> It is looking for it in a gcc 9 installation. But Debian 10 does not
> have gcc 9 installed, it has only
On 23.06.20 17:26, kern wrote:
> What I would appreciate the most would be for a community to submit a
> patch to our current libs3 code base.
You having the bacula-libs3 code available via a public git repository
might be a first step in that direction.
Grüße,
Sven.
signature.asc
Description
(Sorry, I sent this via private-only mail first.)
On 23.06.20 18:38, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> libs3.git is currently available on www.bacula.org in exactly the same
> way that bacula.git is available.
Where? I don't see it on https://www.bacula.org/git/ and both
https://www.bacula.org/libs3 and htt
On 04.10.20 18:46, Marc Chamberlin via Bacula-users wrote:
04-Oct 03:05 bigbang-fd JobId 1782: Error: Read error on
file/sys/kernel/slab/:d-0001024/alloc_calls. ERR=Function not implemented
You are trying to backup the virtual /sys filesystem. You can't do that
and it also makes to sense to
On 24.10.20 04:17, Marcin Haba wrote:
Please let know if it helped.
Bacula 9.6.5 in Ubuntu 20.04 would still be affected by LP:#1898006, right?
Grüße,
Sven.
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge
On 10.12.20 18:05, Phil Stracchino wrote:
Hmm. *Some* twerp somewhere appears to be harvesting this list for spam
- or possibly someone on the list has a compromised mail account or
Windows PC. Y'all might want to check whether you have strange outgoing
mail.
Compromised Account or PC it is
On 17.12.20 07:22, Daniel Rich wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find the packaging files for bacula? I
cloned the git repo, but while it has the source for building the
software it doesn’t have any of the packaging files (i.e. the debian
directory and assorted files).
Since I can’t instal
On 17.12.20 22:49, Daniel Rich wrote:
The ones that come with Ubuntu 20.04 are nearly a year old (9.4.2)
That is not something we Debian Developers can directly influence. But
you can take the Debian sources and rebuild them on a Ubuntu-System and
it will work.
and don’t include mysql sup
On 18.12.20 15:49, Daniel Rich wrote:
The bacula-director package that comes with Ubuntu 20.04, doesn’t
include any database support as far as I can tell other than possibly
sqlite. I couldn’t even get it to start with the database configs I
currently have.
Yes, because you need the bacula-d
On 12.01.21 22:34, mau...@gmx.ch wrote:
Please to Backup with Bacula 9.4.x the VM’s are possible to install
BaculaFD on my Free-Esxi?
No, you cannot install the FD onto you ESXi server, regardless of the
version.
Also: To backup VMs directly you need a VMware License because the API
needed
On 20.02.21 21:12, Robert Earl wrote:
If I create a zero-size file in the proper place on the client, the
Catalog backup proceeds, but is of course null. Why is it even looking
for a database??
The catalog backup is done in two steps:
1) A RunBeforeJob running on the host where the Catalog r
On 26.02.21 00:47, J W wrote:
3. I would try Virtual backups.
Can I just run virtual full backups periodically after the first full
backup? I already have full backups so I could just schedule virtual
full backups instead of full ones.
Do I need separate media types or devices for Virtual Full
On 13.05.21 08:36, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
12-May 22:45 jack-dir JobId 8096: Error: sql_create.c:439 Create DB
Media record INSERT INTO Media
(VolumeName,MediaType,MediaTypeId,PoolId,MaxVolBytes,VolCapacityBytes,Recycle,VolRetention,VolUseDuration,MaxVolJobs,MaxVolFiles,VolStatus,Slot,VolBytes,
On 04.06.21 08:46, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-users wrote:
It seems that the release process is very attractive these days,
the tags are usually pushed at the end of the procedure (after
few days or when preparing the next release. It's better to
be sure that everything is ok because we cannot o
On 04.06.21 14:27, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
pt., 4 cze 2021 o 14:20 Sven Hartge <mailto:s...@svenhartge.de>> napisał(a):
Yes, it looks bad when you have to release several minor version over a
few days,
I think it is more "patch level" and not "minor vers
On 04.06.21 17:18, Dan Langille wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, at 8:19 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
On 04.06.21 08:46, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-users wrote:
If something is wrong, a new release is made and tagged as well.
Same goes for the provided archives. Please don't remove existing one
On 09.07.21 14:22, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I would be a lot happier if they would learn to install it in
/opt/bacula instead of spreading it all over the filesystem though.
Sorry, no can do, the Debian Policy clearly forbids this, the FHS has to
be adhered to.
Grüße,
Sven.
___
On 10.07.21 00:54, Heitor Faria wrote:
That said,
I would be very happy to run Bacula on any version of Debian -- the
Bacula packagers for Debian work closely with the Bacula project --
I would be a lot happier if they would learn to install it in
/opt/bacula instead of sprea
On 13.02.2010 02:26, Jon Schewe wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 08:30 AM, Prashant Ramhit wrote:
>> Ia there a possibility to add PKI Encryption into Bacula Encryption on
>> Ubuntu Bacula Clients.
>> As it is not compiled in.
> It's there, you may need to rebuild to get it. I know that Debian (which
> Ub
On 24.05.2010 22:31, skipunk wrote:
> What would it take to clear up the network bottleneck. I was looking
> at another server that came with our gaming system. Same server
> (memory, hd, etc) and tape library, running on win2k3 and netbackup
> with no issues. The only difference is, it's running
On 26.05.2010 01:55, skipunk wrote:
> The nic's in the server are Broadcom's netextreme II's. I would
> assume that they would support checksum offload and large tcp packet
> offload, but I really I'm not sure.
They do support all offload options.
But those options don't boost you from 40MByte/s
On 29.05.2010 05:13, masker wrote:
> I install a DELL PERC H200 SAS HBA + IBM ULTRIUM-HH5 in my DEBIAN
> system, but fail to install driver for tape drive, lin-tape (ver.
> 1.38.0) . Could you please tell me how to make it ?
A special driver should not be needed, Linux supports SCSI tapes since
On 14.09.2010 18:02, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>> Thanks, I know this version from backports, and if there is no other
>> deb available, I'll give it a try.
>>
>> From http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news (and from the mails I
>> received
85 matches
Mail list logo
