On 28.12.18 19:07, Dante F. B. Colò wrote: > Thanks for your reply, > > In my case m using CentOS 7 , i tried compiled Bacula with libs3 > available on epel repository which is even older than this branch you > mencioned but it fails to build , i''l try with the version available on > your repo. Thank you !
The version in RHEL/Centos7 is about 10 days too old. A bit of warning though: The code in my repository comes without any guarantee in any way. I tried my best to adapt the needed commits from the upstream repository to the older version, but since I only know C enough to be dangerous, you should assume the version in the repository is a) broken, b) insecure and c) doesn't work at all. It just passes the "compiles fine and the compiler doesn't complain too much" phase, but I have not done any test or audit wrt. functionality or security. Please, for the love of $deity, don't use this in production for any data you care about without doing an in-depth audit yourself. I will not be responsible if by using this code you compromise your data and open it to whatever third-party might be interested in it. Grüße, Sven.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
