On 14.09.2010 18:02, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>> Thanks, I know this version from backports, and if there is no other >> deb available, I'll give it a try. >> >> From http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news (and from the mails I >> received from the bacula-bugs list) I had the feeling that 5.0.3 fixed >> some important issues. > > Sorry, I mis-read your intention to skip 5.0.2 (I read it as "skip to"). > > You may wish to contact the backports maintainer (rhonda at deb.at) to > see if there is a plan to update the backport to 5.0.3. The backports > maintaners were very helpful to me when I wished to do a custom > packaging of 5.0.2. I am not affiliated with backports.debian.org so I cannot speak for them, but since there is no 5.0.3 in neither Debian unstable nor Debian testing, the backport will not get updated to 5.0.3 You (Ralf) need to contact the maintainer of Bacula in Debian (John Goerzen) and ask if he is willing to package 5.0.3 and willing to ask the release managers to let this version migrate to testing. Only after all this has happened there will be a backport of 5.0.3. Grüße, Sven. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
