Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Le 01/09/2011 14:33, John Drescher a écrit : 2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon > Hello, I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system. This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the pool. the job and file re

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon > Hello, > > I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system. > This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the pool. > the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The Volume > retention for all volumes in the pool

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Auto reply :) It appears I had orphaned jobs, jobmedia, file,filename and pathes in my catalog. I used dbcheck to get rid of all of them. The volume got pruned and recycled properly afterwards. Regards. Le 01/09/2011 08:38, Alexandre C

[Bacula-users] volume recycling

Hello, I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system. This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the pool. the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The Volume retention for all volumes in the p

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume recycling

2009/10/29 Serge Vostroknutov : > > Hello > > There are several storages defined in the bacula-dir.conf : > > Storage { >   Name = File1 >   Address = hostname        # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here >   SDPort = 9103 >   Password = "***" >   Device = FileStorage1 >   Media Type = File1 >   M

[Bacula-users] Volume recycling

Hello There are several storages defined in the bacula-dir.conf : Storage { Name = File1 Address = hostname# N.B. Use a fully qualified name here SDPort = 9103 Password = "***" Device = FileStorage1 Media Type = File1 Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20 } Storage { Name = File2

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling problem

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote: > I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes.  I have my > jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job > retention for 6 months: > >   File Retention = 90 days            # 90 days >   Job Retention = 6 m

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling problem

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote: > I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes.  I have my > jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job > retention for 6 months: > >   File Retention = 90 days            # 90 days >   Job Retention = 6 m

[Bacula-users] volume recycling problem

I'm having a problem with over-writing recycled volumes. I have my jobs setup so that I retain file information for 90 days and job retention for 6 months: File Retention = 90 days# 90 days Job Retention = 6 months# six months And my catalog has: Volume REtention

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume recycling/pruning

Hello, On 5/11/2007 11:37 AM, luket wrote: > Good morning > > I am currently running bacula on a CentOS machine with no problems. I am > waiting to install a tape drive (problem sourcing the connector to the > server) > > I am having a problem with clearing out data over a certain length of ti

[Bacula-users] Volume recycling/pruning

Good morning I am currently running bacula on a CentOS machine with no problems. I am waiting to install a tape drive (problem sourcing the connector to the server) I am having a problem with clearing out data over a certain length of time. I have had a look through FAQ's and also through thi

[Bacula-users] Volume Recycling

Hi ! I can`t figure out exactly what is needed from the documentation. Please give me a hand :) We have a tape-pool of 16 Tapes that are to be used in a fixed order. Afaik the commands i need to configure are these: Accept Any Volume= yes # use next available volume AutoPrune

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

On Friday 05 August 2005 08:24, LHERBIER Lois wrote: ... > > Kern, > Just for information : pruning a volume, like D04, take about 1 (big) > minute to be done. (Bacula 1.36.2 sarge + sqlite) Yes, one minute is actually not a very long time compared to what some people are experiencing with larg

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Kern Sibbald wrote: >On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >>>On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>said: >>> >>> >> Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

On Thursday 04 August 2005 21:36, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald > >> > <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 23:16:08 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote: >> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > said: >> Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmo

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Martin Simmons wrote: >>On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > said: > >> > Rico> it failed again

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 19:31, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico > >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:43:16 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kern> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: >> > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > said: >> Rico> it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume wa

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:47, Rico wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>said: > >> > >> Rico> it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and > >>

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>>On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>said: >> >> Rico> it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and >> Rico> recycled but "thepig"-job failed. >> >>The output

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 13:16, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Rico> it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and > Rico> recycled but "thepig"-job failed. > > The output looks normal to me, excep

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

> On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 10:37:20 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Rico> it failed again. the admin job was ok. the volume was pruned and Rico> recycled but "thepig"-job failed. The output looks normal to me, except for when the sd says "Cannot find any appendable volumes." This could

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Martin Simmons wrote: >>On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:34:39 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Rico> Martin Simmons wrote: > >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> > >> > Rico> hi > >> > Rico> i have made a "donothing"-backup-job. >

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

> On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:34:39 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Rico> Martin Simmons wrote: >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> Rico> hi >> Rico> i have made a "donothing"-backup-job. >> Rico> then "run donothing". >>

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Martin Simmons wrote: >>On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Rico> hi > > Rico> i have made a "donothing"-backup-job. > > Rico> then "run donothing". > > Rico> 29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477, > Rico> Job=donothing.2005-07

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:00:05 +0200, Rico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Rico> hi Rico> i have made a "donothing"-backup-job. Rico> then "run donothing". Rico> 29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477, Rico> Job=donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49 Rico> volumeretentionper

Re: [Bacula-users] volume recycling

Michael 'buk' Scherer wrote: > Hey. > > Rico wrote: > >> BUT then received this "error"-message: >> >> 29-Jul 10:37 pe2800oracle-sd: Job donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49 waiting. >> Cannot find any appendable volumes. >> Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for: >> Storage:

[Bacula-users] volume recycling

hi i have made a "donothing"-backup-job. then "run donothing". 29-Jul 10:23 pe2800oracle-dir: Start Backup JobId 477, Job=donothing.2005-07-29_10.23.49 volumeretentionperiod is "over". bacula pruned the current volume and changed status to recycle. till here all right. 29-Jul 10:37 pe2800or

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume recycling

Hi MattB! In the Bacula on-line manual http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html you can find the recycling algorithm, that Bacula uses. I quote the relevant part here too: "The full recycling algorithm that Bacula uses when it needs a new Volume is: * Search the Poo

[Bacula-users] Volume recycling

I'm having a tough time trying to get Bacula to recycle volumes properly. I'm trying to backup a Windows server with a full backup on Sunday and incrementals Monday to Saturday. Backup is to a removable USB disk and I want the filenames to be automatically created in the format ProductionVol001,