Re: [Bacula-users] checksums

2006-11-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 00:26, Michael Koppelman wrote: > Sorry if this is redundant but I just wanted to add my voice to the > mix that it is too bad that bacula backs up files that have not > changed just because their mtime changed. In the end, it is probably > less expensive to chec

Re: [Bacula-users] checksums

2006-11-28 Thread Grant Hess
Dan Langille wrote: On 28 Nov 2006 at 17:26, Michael Koppelman wrote: Sorry if this is redundant but I just wanted to add my voice to the mix that it is too bad that bacula backs up files that have not changed just because their mtime changed. I have never seen it a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and Large File Support (LFS) on Mac OS X 10.4.8 Intel

2006-11-28 Thread Hydro Meteor
On 11/27/06, Erich Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Martin, that got it. So yes, running 1.36.x on OS X 10.4.x shows that large file support is enabled. Erich Thanks Erich (and all others) for beating me to the punch and solving this question. Its a good one to solve with certainty a

Re: [Bacula-users] checksums

2006-11-28 Thread Dan Langille
On 28 Nov 2006 at 17:26, Michael Koppelman wrote: > Sorry if this is redundant but I just wanted to add my voice to the > mix that it is too bad that bacula backs up files that have not > changed just because their mtime changed. I have never seen it as a problem. > In the end, it is probabl

[Bacula-users] checksums

2006-11-28 Thread Michael Koppelman
Sorry if this is redundant but I just wanted to add my voice to the mix that it is too bad that bacula backs up files that have not changed just because their mtime changed. In the end, it is probably less expensive to checksum than move and handle redundant data. It would at least be nice

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: File Encryption Performance, Security

2006-11-28 Thread Benjamin Chambers
Landon, I will have heaps of data/metrics for you by the end of the week. Stay tuned. B. Benjamin Chambers, P.Eng. ClarkConnect Account Manager Point Clark Networks 1179 King Street West, Suite 211 Toronto, ON Canada, M6K 3C5 Tel: +1.416.977.0574 Ext. 111 Fax: +1.416.946.1192 Email: [EMAIL

[Bacula-users] Fwd: File Encryption Performance, Security

2006-11-28 Thread Landon Fuller
(new thread for a new topic, and resending to the list since I sent from the wrong From address. Whoops.) On Nov 28, 2006, at 08:44, Benjamin Chambers wrote: I'm doing some more testing for a client of ours, but this looks to be the fault of me running through tests too quickly and possibly k

[Bacula-users] how to debug?

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
I tried using setdebug for all daemons via bconsole. But didn't see any changes. I also ran my client like: ./sbin/bacula-fd -c ./etc/bacula-fd.conf -f -d99 But no output at all. Even when I used bconsole to show status of that client or attempt to do a "run" of a job for that client (so it

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think I had your e-mail address wrong anyway -- I was reading out of the top of that CD file but it seemed to be missing something. I did mess with your CD instructions some, just like you I've been swamped. The machine I was attempting to test rest

Re: [Bacula-users] Need help to restore with bextract.

2006-11-28 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:54:04 -0500, Emery Guevremont said: > > I need to restore a directory from a tape using bextract. The hard part > is that I need to extract the directory's content from a specific date. > Is it possible? How would you suggest I do this if I don't access to the > cat

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula scripting with Ruby?

2006-11-28 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
Op zondag 26 november 2006 08:43, schreef Hydro Meteor: > I am curious however if anyone has done any Bacula scripting with Ruby? > Though I have nothing against Python, I have recently become enamored > with Ruby (and of course Ruby seems to be getting a shot of interest > these days thanks in par

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-28 Thread rwhartzell
Sorry everyone I have just been swamped at work and haven't had much time for anything else. I messaged Kern the other day with basically this. The restore CD project has just been setting on the back burner because I had no response or feedback from any of the people that requested a copy off l

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
My bacula-sd.conf only has one password defined in a Director container. This is the same password as in my Storage container in my bacula-dir.conf. I have a Client container that has the password that matches the password in the Directory container in the client's bacula-fd.conf. I just look

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
On 11/28/06, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.43 Fatal error: Authorization > > > key > > > rejected by Storage daemon. Please see > > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.43 Fatal error: Authorization > > > key > > > rejected by Storage daemon. Please see > > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors for help. > > > 28-Nov 08:14 a1-fd: a1.2006-11-28_08.10.4

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread John Drescher
On 11/28/06, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am using bacula version 1.38.11 on CentOS. > > I have a server that is running bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd. > As far as I can tell the default bacula backups are working f

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-28 Thread Attila Fülöp
Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > One point to add here, incidentally, is that static FD's on Solaris do > not seem to be possible. I'd love for someone to prove me wrong on that > one. In any case, this guide gets around that by copying the libraries >

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> What is this "Authorization key"? It is not mentioned in the manual. And I > don't see anything related in the "Storage Configuration Daemon" chapter. > > I am still reading the very long manual :) I found this in the source at authenticate_storagedaemon() in src/filed/authenticate.c. It says

Re: [Bacula-users] The number of files mismatch!

2006-11-28 Thread Rob Ostrander
I set  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1 everywhere I could find and it didn't seem to help. Alan Brown wrote: On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Ian Levesque wrote: We have been seeing this irregularly too, usually when there are multiple jobs writing to the same volume simultaneously.

Re: [Bacula-users] The number of files mismatch!

2006-11-28 Thread Rob Ostrander
Thank you for the response.  The btape test and fill commands were successful.  We occasionally get db connection errors though afaik the Dir or Sd haven't crashed and the db connections do not seem to correlate to the mismatch issues: 21-Nov 16:22 wcsan1-dir: wcmc8_mda2.2006-11-19_23.05.01 Fa

[Bacula-users] Fatal error: Authorization key rejected by Storage daemon.

2006-11-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
I am using bacula version 1.38.11 on CentOS. I have a server that is running bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd. As far as I can tell the default bacula backups are working fine there. I have another system I need to back up. I only have the bacula-fd installed and running there (and also have

Re: [Bacula-users] Travan tape - very slow

2006-11-28 Thread Peter Crighton
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:55:15 + (GMT), you wrote: > >You really need to run btape and get solid answers. Have you thought about >starting btape in the morning and lettng it run all day? I did - it managed about 3GB (of 10 uncompressed) before I went to bed from 7am to 11pm or so. -- Peter C

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 One point to add here, incidentally, is that static FD's on Solaris do not seem to be possible. I'd love for someone to prove me wrong on that one. In any case, this guide gets around that by copying the libraries necessary along with the file. Ryan N

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Rescue - Solaris 10 - getdiskinfo errors - error on route command

2006-11-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Since Mr. Hartzell does not appear to be answering his e-mail, and my feeling is that he would not mind helping others on this, I'll post his recipe to the list. Hopefully this gets the ball rolling for some people. A Think Tank wrote: > > Anyone co

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore (with file encryption) fails partway through

2006-11-28 Thread Benjamin Chambers
Kern, Thanks for the reply... Fair enough...I wasn't familiar enough with that traceback to know if it provided anything of value or not on my setup. The problem was resolved by deleting a file that somehow (likely me) became corrupted during my tests...the file was readable, but had strange

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore (with file encryption) fails partway through

2006-11-28 Thread Benjamin Chambers
Thanks for your reply Landon... Through a process of elimination, I narrowed it down do a single (text) file in the /etc/network/ directory...Nothing special about it...I could read it fine...but the permissions were root.bacula, which was strange. Long story short...the file was somehow corru

[Bacula-users] Bacula and Storedge L8 on Solaris 10

2006-11-28 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hello, here again to face a strange problem that I think has nothing to do with Bacula itself, but with the device configuration. A sparc machine with Solaris 10 and a Storedge L8 Autoloader, that previously has always ran with Solaris 8 and the Legato software. This time the mtx command always w

[Bacula-users] Backups hung waiting on storage

2006-11-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm a little stumped about this one. The only thing I've changed recently (and we're talking a couple of weeks ago) is the way I deal with incremental backup media. I had previously been closing the tape device after each backup, but really, when a tap

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula scripting with Ruby?

2006-11-28 Thread kodis
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 09:43:25PM -1000, Hydro Meteor wrote: > I am curious however if anyone has done any Bacula scripting with > Ruby? Though I have nothing against Python, I have recently become > enamored with Ruby (and of course Ruby seems to be getting a shot of > interest these days thank

[Bacula-users] Rif: Re: Error writing the first tape block after changing tape

2006-11-28 Thread Ferdinando Pasqualetti
Hi Georg, thanks for your answer. Effectively I did not rerun the btape test after the upgrade from 1.36.3 to 1.38.11, also because I had some successful changes of tapes. I ran btape again, and it passed the test, but I believe there was a strange behaviour, I had to give NEWLINE twice. This is

Re: [Bacula-users] Travan tape - very slow

2006-11-28 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Crighton wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, John Drescher wrote: >> IDE-based tape drives have always "difficult"... > > And of course I have an IDE drive... Hello, Chiming in late here (and I admit that I didn't read the entire conversation), but

Re: [Bacula-users] Travan tape - very slow

2006-11-28 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Peter Crighton wrote: I did read that and yes I understand it says don't use 512 byte blocks, but that is the only way that I've managed to get it to work. http://www.arkeia.com/archives_indexed/2003/08/msg00167.html makes comments about the extreme slowness of the

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore (with file encryption) fails partway through

2006-11-28 Thread Landon Fuller
Morning, Thanks for reporting this -- I believe this was a bug in the newly added block-preserving restoration code. I committed a fix for this, and a few other issues. Do you think you could try again with the latest code from CVS? Thanks, Landon On Nov 27, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Benjamin Cham

Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=Operation timed out

2006-11-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
A couple of comments: - 15 seconds is probably way over kill. A 5 minute interval is probably sufficient. - If you don't have heartbeat turned on in the FD as well as the SD, the failure will most likely continue. I suspect you just put the heart beat directive in the wrong place. On Tuesda

Re: [Bacula-users] ERR=Operation timed out

2006-11-28 Thread Leander Koornneef
On 28-nov-2006, at 10:05, Dahlgren Mattias wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Im trying to set up bacula to do the backup of the about 12 FreeBSD > webservers we have. > > I got it working on all but 2 servers, on these servers i keep > continuosly getting errors that the operation times out. The stran

[Bacula-users] ERR=Operation timed out

2006-11-28 Thread Dahlgren Mattias
Hello everyone. Im trying to set up bacula to do the backup of the about 12 FreeBSD webservers we have. I got it working on all but 2 servers, on these servers i keep continuosly getting errors that the operation times out. The strange thing is that it seems to ALWAYS occur after almost the exact