Sorry if this is redundant but I just wanted to add my voice to the mix that it is too bad that bacula backs up files that have not changed just because their mtime changed. In the end, it is probably less expensive to checksum than move and handle redundant data. It would at least be nice if one could choose the scheme in the configuration so people who need to conserve computation time and people who need to converse bandwidth could choose accordingly.
I understand this may be in the works. That would be good news! Bacula is very nice! Thank you! Michael >> The only way to deal with this is checksumming the file vs >> stored file checksums and that is computationally expensive. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
