Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-2: Qquantum lto-2 hh or HP Ultrium 448

On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:24 -0600, Don MacArthur wrote: > I don't know specifically about the ltos, but when I used dlts and had > the hp support tech onsite he said they tape drives were actually > quantum. Hey, that's interesting...two days ago I got info (citation from tech. support) on #bac

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source + Win32 binaries release to Source Forge

The need to run "sc remove Bacula" was due to a bug in the new installer. I've checked in a fix which will be in 1.39.26 coming out soon. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sebastien Guilbaud Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:21 AM To: bacula-u

[Bacula-users] An identical two drive failure

never told to unload slot 2 from drive 1. The mtx-changer log segments are below. These are contiguous lines in the original file; I have interleaved a few comments to try and make it easy to read. -- Michael 20061013-17:32:23 Parms: /dev/sg14 loaded 1 /dev/nst8 0 20061013-17:32:23 Doing mtx

Re: [Bacula-users] database error

On Friday 13 October 2006 19:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > bacula starts properly and I can get in to bconsole and do status on dir, > sd and fd. When I try to run a backup job I get the following. Most likely you are mixing Bacula daemons of different versions. > > > > 13-Oct 10:11 bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-2: Qquantum lto-2 hh or HP Ultrium 448

I don't know specifically about the ltos, but when I used dlts and had the hp support tech onsite he said they tape drives were actually quantum. But, that is something I heard from someone who heard it from someone else, not to mention that this is a business where vendors change their practice

[Bacula-users] Bacula storage daemon - didn't accept device filestorage command - segmentation fault

Hi, I have a bacula setup on my network with a director, some clients and a storage machine. Everything works fine (except for some troubles with automatic labels), but now I want to add another storage with a DVD recorder. Well, I did setup the DVD storage like the examples found over the sit

Re: [Bacula-users] [OT] Quantum drive unsupported ?

> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:51:31 +0200, Emmanuel Lesouef said: > > I have these lines in my dmesg : > > SCSI subsystem initialized > ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 11 > PCI: setting IRQ 11 as level-triggered > ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0a.0[A] -> Link [LNKB] -> GSI 11 (level,

[Bacula-users] [OT] Quantum drive unsupported ?

Dear list, I recently got a new DLT 160 tape drive. This media is new for me and I have some problems getting it to work. I use Debian as my OS and my kernel is : Linux rivendell 2.6.17-2-k7 #1 SMP Sat Sep 23 20:23:52 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux It seems that my tape drive is detected : rivendell:

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows Restore Errors

Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 02:53, Tim Schaab wrote: >> Howdy All, >> >> I am testing Bacula for a backup solution for the department's users and >> servers. When testing a Windows XP restore, I keep getting a Zlib buffer >> errors like the following: >> >> > 9-Oct 13:37 bar

Re: [Bacula-users] Res: DLT or LTO-2 drive

On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 06:40 -0700, Georger Araujo wrote: > I read the documentation for both drives in > http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12128_div/12128_div.html > and > http://www.quantum.com/Products/TapeDrives/LTOUltrium/LTO-2HH/Index.aspx, > and I believe you can go for the Q

Re: [Bacula-users] Poll - What operating systems do you run Bacula on?

Howdy, We currently have a test setup running the following: * Director, FD, SD * Processor: Dual PIII 800 RAM: 1G OS: Ubuntu 6.01.1 Bacula: 1.38.11 (Backported from Ubuntu Edgy) Clients currently include Ubuntu 6.01 and Windows XP. Bacula will be rolled out when testing

[Bacula-users] database error

bacula starts properly and I can get in to bconsole and do status on dir, sd and fd. When I try to run a backup job I get the following. 13-Oct 10:11 bacula-dir: Start Backup JobId 25288, Job=ds0-metc.2006-10-13_10.11.26 13-Oct 10:11 bacula-sd: Volume "FVOL-0115" previously written, moving to

Re: [Bacula-users] Poll - What operating systems do you run Bacula on?

No worries. We're running the entire server portion of Bacula on: Dell PowerEdge 2650 Processors: 2x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz, HyperThreaded RAM: 1GB OS: Gentoo Linux 2006.1 Bacula Version: 1.36.3-r2 (any word on when a newer version is coming to Portage?) Have a mix of Dell PE1800, PE

Re: [Bacula-users] Resolved: FW: Autoloader: Replace tape in magazine after backups complete?

Couldn’t agree more; we were taken off guard by that answer from Quantum’s support.  We had been looking for a reasonably priced entry-level autoloader that would take LTO2 or greater, and the SuperLoader3 came in at a decent price and little rack space.  Been a great performer, too.  Lucki

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: backup is slow

In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > "BM" == Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > BM> In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> gzip on this computer, on one CPU, reach about 18 Mbyte/s. bacula with > >> >> gzip only reach ~7.7 Mbyte/s. This lea

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: backup is slow

> "BM" == Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BM> In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> gzip on this computer, on one CPU, reach about 18 Mbyte/s. bacula with >> >> gzip only reach ~7.7 Mbyte/s. This leads me to believe that there are >> >> room for improvement. >>

[Bacula-users] Res: DLT or LTO-2 drive

I read the documentation for both drives in http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12128_div/12128_div.html and http://www.quantum.com/Products/TapeDrives/LTOUltrium/LTO-2HH/Index.aspx, and I believe you can go for the Quantum. Same 64 MB buffer memory size, same Ultra160 interface (the

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: backup is slow

In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> gzip on this computer, on one CPU, reach about 18 Mbyte/s. bacula with > >> gzip only reach ~7.7 Mbyte/s. This leads me to believe that there are > >> room for improvement. > > BM> Again, the story changes. Above, you indicate that ta

[Bacula-users] LTO-2: Qquantum lto-2 hh or HP Ultrium 448

Hi! I've got very useful feedback regarding the choice between DLT and LTO-2 tape drives. Thanks to all! Now, the remaining dilemma is between Quantum's LTO-2 HH & HP's Ultrium 448 :-/ The price difference between the two is about 600€ (1250€ vs. 1880€) for external unit, or let's say more sim

[Bacula-users] Strange behavior

Hi,   After I changed scheduled I started receiving these messages:   13-Oct 12:00 brutus-dir: Start Backup JobId 281, Job=Fas000s.2006-10-13_12.00.00 13-Oct 12:00 brutus-sd: Fas000s.2006-10-13_12.00.00 Error: block.c:538 Write error at 445:1 on device "LTO" (/dev/st0). ERR=Input/output

Re: [Bacula-users] minor issue question on console interface

Shame on me :$ Sorry. Thank you all. Jaime Ventura [Infra-estruturas e Comunicações] Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431 4200 - 072 Porto Telef: +351 22 834 05 00 (04) - ext. 1641 Fax: +351 22 832 11 59 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url:www.isep.ipp

Re: [Bacula-users] Poll - What operating systems do you run Bacula on?

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Mark A. Bober wrote: > Alpha Tru64/OSF-1. (this was a *real* pain to get compiled, and this > machine is now dead, so) Do you have a set of compile options for client-only? AB - Using Tomcat but need

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: backup is slow

> "BM" == Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BM> In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > "BM" == Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> BM> In response to "Anders Boström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> I did some new performance-tests: >> >> >> >> All operati