On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
> distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
> Distrib-u-Matic or make it disinterested.
Can you do your job and deal me one then please?
--
Charles Walker
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I object to all pending attempts to make an interested proposal
>> distributable which I have not already objected to. Use a
>> Distrib-u-Matic or make it disinter
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 1:37 AM, comex wrote:
> BUY [you pay zm]
> Offerer Cost Selling
> Pavitra 500zm Minister without Portfolio
Don't we have rates for the Major Arcana? If not, I guess we should make some.
--
Charles Walker
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Add a new card to the deck of change:
>
> Free Parking - Specify up to three assets owned by the L&FD. Those
> assets are transferred to you.
I could get ribbons and all sorts with that. I'd restrict it to cards.
--
Charles Walker
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> l Wooble charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com 16 Nov 07 17 Oct 09
> v Walker geoffsp...@gmail.com 25 Nov 09 24 Oct 09
CoE: for some reason you mixed mine and Wooble's email addresses up.
--
Charles Walker
AN and CALL change that Card's Frequency by announcement,
and SHALL NOT deal a card before e does so.
with:
Changing the frequency of each card type is secured.
}}
--
Charles Walker
2009/12/6 comex :
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> During an election for an office which has a budget, the
>> candidates SHALL publish a proto-budget for that office; this
>> proto-budget is invalid unless it would be a vali
d myself two Discard Pickings and three Absolv-o-Matics.
> I award Murphy two Discard Pickings and two Absolv-o-Matics.
Unless the rules have been changed, don't I earn two draws from each
deck for registering?
--
Charles Walker
e there.
I don't think a cards repeal is coming anytime soon, but I will be
gunning for something like this when it does.
--
Charles Walker
2009/12/11 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Also, for each of the following colours of ribbon, I intend, without
>> objection, to transfer one from the Lost and Found department to
>> myself:
>>
>> Red
>> Oran
outside of such a system multiple conditionally transferable votes
simply lead to PRESENT, so the rules do need changing away from the
current to either straight FPTP/plurality or to IRV.
--
Charles Walker
Just testing Gmail filters.
--
Charles Walker
Is everyone else getting an error when trying to access Nomic Wiki?
http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/Agora
--
Charles Walker
e was doing some work on the
> server last week that also brought down the B wiki for a while. I
> don't believe e reads the Agora lists.
Will do.
--
Charles Walker
ddress is uckel...@nomic.net
--
Charles Walker
It's like a proactive Greetor.
Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
of active players?
Charles Walker
Sent on Mobile
On 20 Mar 2011 03:30, "Aaron Goldfein" wrote:
> As I'm sure all have noticed, Agoran activity is very low. When I
Would I be right in saying that the class of a crime no longer has any
effect on the ninny (i.e. that they no longer receive a worse punishment for
a greater class of crime)?
--
Charles Walker
On 20 March 2011 16:18, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>> > It's like a proactive Greetor.
>> >
>> > Do you intend the office to have a legal re
aving a debate based on the
assumption that increasing the number of active players in an
impossible task. Would it really be that hard?
--
Charles Walker
The voting period for a decision cannot be set or changed to a
> duration longer than fourteen days.
Can this ever happen under the current rules?
Otherwise I support the proposal, and would probably vote FOR it in
its current state anyway.
--
Charles Walker
So do I.
Charles Walker
Sent via Mobile
On 21 Mar 2011 19:20, "omd" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Geoffrey Spear
wrote:
>> I intend with 2 support to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 2980.
>> I intend with 2 support to file a motion to reconsider CFJ 2979.
>
> I support both.
ing omd of breaking Rule 2158, a power 2 Rule, by
> failing to judge case 2980 within the time limit.
> NoV 112.
Wait, why does the Herald assign NoV IDs?
--
Charles Walker
Welcome!
Charles Walker
Sent from my mobile.
On 30 Mar 2011 19:00, "Tedd Williams" wrote:
> I wish to register. I am a first-class person, being composed mostly of
Carbon, Oxygen, and Hydrogen. I wish to be known as "Wofi", or "Woofie" if
that is not available.
for which no election is already in progress by announcement.
Maybe this should be with Support to prevent frivolous elections?
Another possibility is requiring the IADoP to initiate elections if
any of the exceptions apply, perhaps at the beginning of each month.
--
Charles Walker
Walker
On 4 Apr 2011 21:37, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Appeal 2982a
>>
>> Panelist: Murphy
>> Panelist: G.
>> Panelist: omd
>> Decision:
>>
Whoops, clicked the wrong button. I was just going to point out that 7 days
is the minimum timeout. This probably should be shortened, though.
Walker
On 4 Apr 2011 21:45, "Charles Walker" wrote:
> Walker
> On 4 Apr 2011 21:37, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>>
>>
On 5 April 2011 00:08, Tanner Swett wrote:
>> 6984 2.0 Walker Cleanup
> AGAINST
>
>> 6985 1.0 Walker no equity cases
> AGAINST
Um, why?
--
Charles Walker
On 5 April 2011 18:32, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> NoV: Yally violated Rule 1504 (a Power 2 Rule) by becoming active
>> during eir timeout period.
>>
> Gratuitous argument: The suspension, even if it didn't make
> em active, s
as opposed to discussion of the game. Also I guess that in
future people who are looking for this kind of thing are more likely
to be searching a-b and a-o than a-d.
--
Charles Walker
On 6 April 2011 16:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I initiate an election for Registrar. I nominate myself. [Would be
> happy if anyone other than Yally wants it, but am willing to serve
> if absolutely need be].
There is already an ongoing election. (With me as a candidate.)
--
Charles Walker
On 6 April 2011 17:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 6 April 2011 16:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > I initiate an election for Registrar. I nominate myself. [Would be
>> > happy if anyone other than Yally wants it
LTY/TIME-OUT (14 days).
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to call for reconsideration of this. Are
> you sure e actually noticed that the judgement was affirmed? You, for
> example, didn't.
>
Well, e definitely knew when e did this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg21614.html
--
Charles Walker
On 6 April 2011 20:00, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Alright then. I become active,
You know, you don't actually have to become active in every public
message for it to be valid.
--
Charles Walker
I know, that was meant to sound more jokey than how it came out.
---
Charles Walker
On 6 Apr 2011 20:41, "Aaron Goldfein" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 15:36, Charles Walker
wrote:
>> On 6 April 2011 20:00, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> Alright then. I become activ
vote. (Unless maybe it was such a horrible encoding
that I don't deserve the office.)
--
Charles Walker
On 7 April 2011 20:08, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> { Proposal: Exile (AI 2) (coauthors: Yally, G.)
>>
>> Append the following to the list of sentences in Rule 1504:
>>
>> * EXILE, appropriate for rule breaches of the hi
How about letting anyone deregister the ninny by announcement after a week?
I would support that appeal, btw.
---
Charles Walker
On 7 Apr 2011 21:19, "Geoffrey Spear" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Yally wrote:
>>> Perhaps y
On 11 April 2011 18:43, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> When a judge assigns a judgement to a non-appeal judicial case
>> within any time limits for doing so, e gains 5 points.
>
> Does that mean "within a
On 11 April 2011 21:30, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> I think that this is FALSE, FALSE and TRUE respectively.
>
> Pretty standard interpretation; any reason this *wouldn't* be
> the case? -G.
Well, this is Agora. Someone was bound to
On 11 April 2011 22:12, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 11 April 2011 21:30, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> >> I think that this is FALSE, FALSE and TRUE respectively.
>> >
&
e same power as the proposal points rule, and not
necessarily overpowered because points are more likely than not to
come to change voting limits on ordinary decisions. (Unless
Soles/Souls passes).
--
Charles Walker
>
Note to Assessor: you might not have to resolve either because the
author is possibly not a player.
Has anyone CFJ'd on that yet?
--
Charles Walker
On 12 April 2011 21:22, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> I initiate an election for IADoP. I nominate omd.
>
> Not my fault that e ragequit over an election.
>
Well, it is /partly/, and although e may have overreacted, if you had
been
On 13 April 2011 05:55, Florw wrote:
> I hereby register.
>
> Florw
>
Welcome!
--
Charles Walker
.
>>
>> It's not *my* fault if someone registers in an uninteresting manner.
>
> Proto: In R869, replace "reasonably clearly and reasonably
> unambiguously" with "reasonably unclearly and reasonably ambiguously".
FOR.
Mind you, by that standard my registration was positively weary.
--
Charles Walker
Yes, this is what I implied in the wording of both reports. I just wanted to
be on the safe side by referencing the CFJs.
---
Charles Walker
On 13 Apr 2011 22:03, "Quazie" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Charl
You cannot initiate an IADoP election; there is already one in progress.
---
Charles Walker
On 14 Apr 2011 00:15, "Sean Christopher Sherwood Hunt" <
scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>
>> I assume the office o
proposals about Souls and Soles?
--
Charles Walker
On 15 April 2011 19:58, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 19:29, Charles Walker wrote:
>> The proposals about partnerships or the proposals about Souls and Soles?
>
> Um, the veto ones.
>
Well, I considered voting AGAINST 7013 but FOR 7014, but then changed
my mind beca
On 17 April 2011 21:20, Charles Walker wrote:
> --
> Scheduled with Time Cave (http://www.timecave.com)
>
> Subscribe for $12/year to eliminate these short "message tags" and the
> 2-message-per-day limit. You can subscribe at the following URL:
>
> http://
s for any other
action. A state verb would most likely fail to meet the requirements
for a normal action, where the rules about ambiguity are rather more
strict.
--
Charles Walker
it up then go supine.
>
> DISCLAIMER: Any of the previous statements might have failed.
>
> I am looking forward to seeing what comes out of all of this.
Why do you hate Murphy so much?
--
Charles Walker
r they appear
in the message, unless otherwise specified.
-
A first-class person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or
prevented by the rules) register by publishing a message that
indicates reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
intends to become a player at that time.
--
Charles Walker
action was not ILLEGAL, since R2170 demands that "A player
> SHALL NOT" take confusing nicknames; at the time of that action I was not a
> player. This reasoning has the same effect on CFJ 1703.
> Finally, if I am not a player I have not taken any ILLEGAL actions."
Welcome from the Registrar. I keep a list of you fuzzy cat-in-box things.
--
Charles Walker
average number of Points gained for an adopted
proposal in this distribution was just under 9, not counting
co-authors. For the rejected proposals which actually caused anyone to
lose Points, the average loss was 4.25 Points.
--
Charles Walker
for which no election is already in progress by announcement.
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
What happened to this proposal?
--
Charles Walker
Fast. This time period
is set when the requirement is created (ie. X days before
the limit ends). A requirement to perform an action at an
exact instant (e.g. "when X, Y SHALL Z"), but not "in the
same message", is instead interpreted as a requirement to
perform that action in a timely fashion after that instant.
}}
--
Charles Walker
On 20 April 2011 16:27, Elliott Hird wrote:
> FOR iff you work Magic / More Magic into there.
>
I like that, but have now idea how, unless we want a switch which resets Agora.
--
Charles Walker
formatting" in Gmail.
>
It might also help to go into settings (the General tab) and turn
"Outgoing message encoding" to UTF-8.
--
Charles Walker
On 20 April 2011 19:31, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 20 April 2011 17:26, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Eric Stucky
>> > wrote:
>> >> On a related note, is there anyth
On 20 April 2011 19:49, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 20 April 2011 19:31, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> >> On 20 April 2011 17:26, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> >>
>>
On 20 April 2011 22:39, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 20 April 2011 19:22, Charles Walker wrote:
>> I like that, but have now idea how, unless we want a switch which resets
>> Agora.
>
> Make there be an abstract Machine. The Machine is either On or Off,
> unless the Magic Sw
On 21 April 2011 11:11, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 21 April 2011 10:27, Charles Walker wrote:
>> Proto:
>>
>> Enact a new Rule entitled "The Machine" with the following text:
>>
>> There exists an abstract entity called the Machine. The
>>
On 21 April 2011 22:58, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> Walker created a Wikipedia page for Agora. And it hasn't been deleted
> yet! I'm glad our game has become notable enough to be included.
>
It's not a very good article; it's just something I bashed out in ten minutes.
--
Charles Walker
On 23 April 2011 06:50, Eric Stucky wrote:
> This one's a little long :)
>
> I CFJ: The FLR published on 12 April 2011 is incomplete.
The FLR wasn't published on 12 April 2011, as far as I can see.
--
Charles Walker
by each Better.
}}
--
Charles Walker
and let Collusion cover situations where a Better
> illegally tells someone else that e has placed / plans to place a Bet.
Ok.
On 24 April 2011 00:13, omd wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> c) at least one of the Bets was for the correct
resolution must specify how many Points are
lost and gained by each Better.
The resolution of a betting market constitutes a self-ratifying
claim that the Bets in the resolution are valid, and that no
other valid Bets were submitted for the decision.
--
Charles Walker
er.)
I wonder who the current Baby of the House is? I am also younger than Agora.
--
Charles Walker
On 24 April 2011 16:45, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 24 April 2011 16:08, Charles Walker wrote:
>> I wonder who the current Baby of the House is? I am also younger than Agora.
>
> Unless you were born later than August 1995, it's almost certainly me.
>
Yes, it's you.
--
Charles Walker
8, 10}
> Herald {0, 6}
> IADoP {4, 4}
> Promotor {4, 10}
> Registrar {4, 0}
> Rulekeepor {10, 10}
> Scorekeepor {4, 0}
> Horton {4, 0}
Why do you intend to give several offices which have no monthly duties
a monthly salary?
--
Charles Walker
sor, and the valid
> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). Then,
> I assign each listed proposal the ID number specified under "NUM".
I think that this is missing my 'Presidential Proposals'.
--
Charles Walker
rect: Validity is measured when the market is resolved so
theoretically the Better can Bet as many Points as they like as long
as they have them in time.
--
Charles Walker
layer's point total reaches zero
> by this method, be becomes at peace with all players, nobody can declare war
> on em for 21 days, e cannot declare war on anyone for 21 days, and rules to
> the contrary notwithstanding, e CANNOT gain any points for 14 days
>
FOR.
--
Charles Walker
entity poorly qualified to judge a case is necessarily not
>>> unqualified to judge that case.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I consent to any player transferring these cases to emself, provided e
>> transfers both in the same message.
>>
> Could you just recuse yourself?
Yes, but I wanted to try this method first. I may recuse myself if
no-one is interested.
--
Charles Walker
Accused's possession are destroyed equal to the
Class of the specified Crime, or in its absence the Power of the
violated rule, rounded up and multiplied by five.
--
Charles Walker
On 25 April 2011 22:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 11-04-25 04:06 PM, Charles Walker wrote:
>>
>> Walker 83 167
>
> How?
>
> -scshunt
>
Proposals 7005 through 7010 and 7012, the Registrar office and CFJ 2997.
--
Charles Walker
t; other players.
As this represents a considerable increase in the Scorekeepor's
workload, the proposal should increase eir Salary. (Whoever e is, I
can't remember at the moment...)
--
Charles Walker
On 28 April 2011 22:08, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> Tanner L. Swett ihope...@gmail.com 21 Sep 09
>
> CoE: I cannot be reached at that email address.
Corrected in draft.
--
Charles Walker
same sentence in different contexts are
>> different statements.
>>
>>
>
> FALSE. A single statement can have different truth values depending on
> context, but it's not a different statement.
>
> -scshunt
NttPF.
--
Charles Walker
On 5 May 2011 19:29, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 05/05/11 11:27, Charles Walker wrote:
>>
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> {{ Point Speaker (AI 2)
>>
>> Amend Rule 103 (The Speaker) by replacing
>>
>> The Speaker is the single first-
t; deiłnígo dayózhí.
>
> Google Translate thinks this is Basque, which seems... unlikely.
> Especially since it can only translate one word.
>
It thinks it's Turkish for me.
--
Charles Walker
On 19 May 2011 18:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> G. 83 167
>
>> Murphy 224 26
>> Walker 226 24
>
> I transfer 25 points to Murphy and 23 points to Walker.
>
> To dat
On 19 May 2011 19:11, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 19 May 2011 18:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> >> G. 83 167
>> >
>> >> Murphy
ntive to earn points. Perhaps there
could also be a higher limit (eg. 400-500 Points) beyond which anyone
could force a win?
--
Charles Walker
On 19 May 2011 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> Why not just propose the spending of points that you just mentioned?
>> If players had to spend Points to increase their voting limit, publish
>> multiple NoVs etc. then this wo
d change;
this does not apply to generally preventing changes to specified
areas of the gamestate, nor to a proposal preventing itself from
taking effect (its no-effect clause is generally interpreted as
applying only to the rest of the proposal).
}}
--
Charles Walker
x27;t checked for bugs yet.
--
Charles Walker
On 21 May 2011 17:17, omd wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> After considering the arguments made in discussion I concur that the
>> rule fails to define the switch. I honestly did not consider that
>> R2347 might be interpreted as defin
On 19 May 2011 20:48, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
>> Enact a new Power 3 Rule entitled "Adoption" with the following text:
>>
>> If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
>> then the propos
were in the pool at the beginning of the week, distribute the X
proposals with the greatest Priority, breaking ties in favour of
those proposals which were submitted first. (Where X is the
Legislative Volume.)
--
Charles Walker
On 22 May 2011 18:59, omd wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>> The Legislative Volume is a positive integer by the Promotor,
>> with a default of 20. (If Budgets are adopted, this would be
>> part of the Promotor'
On 22 May 2011 20:13, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 22 May 2011 18:59, omd wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>>> The Legislative Volume is a positive integer by the Promotor,
>>> with a default of 20. (If Budgets are ado
r 2, which likely
>>> breaks the game
>>
>> I change my vote on 7070 to AGAINST.
>
> I do the same.
It doesn't make proposal enactment power 2, it makes the definition of
proposals power 2. Each proposal would still be enacted by a power 3
rule so there is no problem here.
--
Charles Walker
have this in R106 (power 3):
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and
its adoption index, and then it takes effect.
--
Charles Walker
On 3 June 2011 18:44, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 06/03/11 10:30, Charles Walker wrote:
>>
>> Gratuitous:
>>
>> We still have this in R106 (power 3):
>>
>> If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
>> then the proposal
On 3 June 2011 20:35, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:36 PM, woggle wrote:
>> > [This time from my subscribed e-mail.]
>> >
>> > On 6/3/11 11:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >> On 06/03/11 10:4
On 4 June 2011 05:03, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>>> 7068 2 Walker Spending Points
>> CoE: I withdrew this version and submitted a fixed one which prevents
>> spending the same points on multiple actions.
>
&g
On 16 June 2011 06:25, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I destroy 250 points in Walker's possession to cause em to satisfy
> the Victory Condition of Accumulation (everyone else's are halved).
>
> -G.
Thank you, I suppose. I should have got round to doing that.
This is my first win
On 18 June 2011 05:25, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 18 June 2011 05:22, Sgeo wrote:
>> I object.
>
> I intend, without objection, to deregister Sgeo.
>
> You are inactive and raising the quorum.
>
Inactive players don't raise quorum.
--
Charles Walker
101 - 200 of 472 matches
Mail list logo
