On 20 April 2011 08:20, Eric Stucky <turiski.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > So I've been reading for a bit and I can now understand most of what you > guys say, at least on the face of it :P > With that in mind, I declare my name to be ehird. > Twelve seconds after this message is sent, I declare my name to be Turiski. > Thirteen seconds after this message is sent, I CFJ: "Turiski is a player, > and if so, e has not performed any ILLEGAL actions." The following evidence > will be submitted by Turiski, the caller: > "CFJ 1275. > CFJ 1263 & precedent. > R 2170." > along with the following arguments: > "First, I attempted to become indistinguishable from ehird. It's not a very > wholehearted attempt, I admit. If I was successful, however, I am a player, > since the entity that is indistinguishable from ehird must be a player (CFJ > 1275) and that entity is me. > Second, I argue that my CFJ causes my message to express "clear desire or > intent to register," which would therefore make me a player. Although CFJ > 2979 suggests that calling a CFJ places doubt into the matter, I argue that > since I did not explicitly state my registration, this sufficiently > differentiates this case from 2979 to warrant a separate evaluation. > Third, if I register for the first reason, Turiski clearly performed an > illegal action by R2170. However, if I register for the second reason, I > claim my first action was not ILLEGAL, since R2170 demands that "A player > SHALL NOT" take confusing nicknames; at the time of that action I was not a > player. This reasoning has the same effect on CFJ 1703. > Finally, if I am not a player I have not taken any ILLEGAL actions."
Welcome from the Registrar. I keep a list of you fuzzy cat-in-box things. -- Charles Walker
