On 20 March 2011 16:18, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker >> <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > It's like a proactive Greetor. >> > >> > Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number >> > of active players? >> > >> > Charles Walker >> > Sent on Mobile >> >> I wouldn't say legal, but certainly players should look at the >> accomplishments of the Recruitor when deciding whether to retain or >> replace him. > > Legal requirements that are sometimes impossible to comply with are more > fun. >
Perhaps the officer (officor?) would only get 'paid' under any new system of assets if there was a net increase in the number of active players during each month of em holding the office? Or maybe there should just be a reward for players who are cited as the cause when someone registers/ becomes active? -- Charles Walker
