Re: DIS: Proto-judgements of CFJs 3726 and 3727

On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 04:59, James Cook wrote: > Comments welcome. Sorry that it's so long. I went back and forth on > 3726 a couple of times. Thanks for an interesting judgement--a good way for me to get back into the game. My instinct was that 3726 is TRUE, along the line of argument that you s

DIS: Re: BUS: Take 6

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 03:20, James Cook wrote: > > Welcome! I've added you as "Walker" to the directory; let me know if > you prefer to be referred to some other way. > > I grant a welcome package to Walker. Thanks! -- Walker

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Temporary Deputy-ADoP] Initiation of Election for Prime Minister

On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 02:09, Kerim Aydin wrote: > [Also: good to see you in the game again Walker, and welcome Jason Cobb!] Thanks G., and good to see you're still around! -- Walker

Re: DIS: Plot twist: new proto-judgements of CFJs 3726 and 3727

On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 03:27, James Cook wrote: > Having established that, here is the hypothetical timeline: > > * D. Margaux publishes correct Astronomor and Clork reports. > * omd Points eir Finger at D. Margaux for publishing inaccurate > information in those reports. > * D. Margaux authorize

DIS: Re: BUS: Right Action

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 04:13, Owen Jacobson wrote: > I pay 4 coins to Walker. Thanks, o. -- Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: judicial list

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 21:32, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > The judicial list (interested judges) I'm working from is: > > D. Margaux, G., Murphy, Trigon, Falsifian, V.J. Rada > > Any changes/additions, or did I miss anyone? > > Thinking of doing away with the "weekend court" distinction... a bit > too m

Re: DIS: report reward fixes

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 23:48, D. Margaux wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote: > > Perhaps simplify to something like: > > > > * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first > > time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins. > > > > Though I suppose m

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Some one help me in starting to play i want to join

On 13 October 2015 at 00:38, omd wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> A blank message with a subject line action hasn't been tried before, >> I think. > > http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2007-April/006296.html > :) Do you know the relev

DIS: Re: BUS: Future of Agora

On 19 June 2016 at 23:13, omd wrote: > It’s not that I want it to be over. My interest, presumably like many other > players’, has waxed and waned over the years, and after such a long hiatus I > for one would probably be pretty active if there were a new spurt of > activity. If some of the usua

Re: DIS: Rule Improvements

On 28 June 2016 at 13:50, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 17:46 -0500, nichdel wrote: >> Now that we've discussed the technical improvements to Agora and plans >> seem to be underway, I thought it'd be worthwhile to talk in more >> detail about possible changes to the rules, especially since

Re: DIS: Rule Improvements

On 29 June 2016 at 13:33, Charles Walker wrote: > The glossary is a good idea for introducing new players to the rules, > but I'd also suggest a short 'How to Play Agora' guide which gives > someone enough information to start playing immediately. I might type > up a

Re: DIS: Rule Improvements

On 1 July 2016 at 03:22, nichdel wrote: > I think this is a really nice start, and a much needed document. Now we have > a central spot to point new players to! Thanks! > Speaking of links, do we need to change the rules to allow markdown and > links > inside the rules? Do the rules about the te

DIS: Re: BUS: Let's get the ball rolling again

On 11 July 2016 at 18:46, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Looks like things are starting to get interesting again. I register as a > player. Hello! I also register.

Re: DIS: The ideal grind

On 11 July 2016 at 18:31, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I've been thinking about currency/grind games, and was trying to > enumerate what makes them "successful" in Agora in my experience. > Here's my start on a feature list; thoughts? > > The Ideal Grind > > 1. Allows each player to perform around 3-6 "g

Re: DIS: The ideal grind

On 13 July 2016 at 01:53, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> I've been thinking about currency/grind games, and was trying to >> enumerate what makes them "successful" in Agora in my experience. >> Here's my start on a feature list; thoughts? > > I’m leery

Re: DIS: The ideal grind

On 13 July 2016 at 21:32, nichdel wrote: > On 07/12/2016 08:02 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> >> The real question is, what does Agora’s economy produce? I can think of >> “rules proposals” and “reports,” and nichdel’s game prototype thread >> suggests a few more things. Can we use a monetary game to

DIS: To-do

I thought it might be useful to write up an informal to-do list for all of the suggestions that have been made recently: http://hearthgate.net/agorawiki/To-do-list This is incomplete, and I encourage others to add or expand on items. I should also point out that not everything on the list is uncon

Re: DIS: Proto: Old/New Economy Draft

On 1 August 2016 at 02:19, nichdel wrote: > Critique and comments are welcome in general, but I also have a specific > question: > >Right now I have a new office, the Bankor, and Currency Heads. The >point of this system is to spread the control of the economy, and >I've also made each

DIS: InterNomic II

I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted at http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set of forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the forums allow for anonymous and non-member posts if you want to try it out without joining

DIS: InterNomic II

I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to join (If you wait for B Nomic to catch up in around 6 days). C-walker

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

Fresh Nomic, the nomic on the xkcd forums, and Blognomic. On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > c-walker wrote: > > > I'm just checking up on how things are progressing regarding joining > > InterNomic over here. Elsewhere it looks like we have 4 nomics ready to > > join (If you wa

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic. On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have > exactly one member who is literally playing nomic by himself. >

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

Oh, and there's also Faucet Nomic. On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Charles Walker < charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Oh. I guess it still counts as a nomic. > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > >> I researched this Fres

Re: DIS: Joining InterNomic 2

You should keep it general, but you need to mention who is going to vote on Agora's behalf as the liaison. You could say something along the lines of 'Where another nomic makes it possible for Agora or a representative of Agora to perform actions within that nomic, X (person or post) may, without 3

Re: DIS: Joining InterNomic 2

Well I don't actually play Agora so I wouldn't know. I'ts probably better to change the Ambassador rule. C-walker On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > This X should probably be an office, but I'm not sure which one: first > I thought the natural choice would be the Ambassador

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

Hey, I've just researched this again and not including me, there are 3 members: http://groups.google.com/group/fresh-nomic?pli=1 On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > I researched this Fresh Nomic a little bit and I've found that they have > exactly one member who is literally

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

True. On InterNomic he mentioned that all four players know each other in real life, so I assumed... On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Yes, but do they play? I can't find any message by anyone other than > kennercat... > > 2009/3/23 Charles Walker : &

Re: DIS: InterNomic II

Agora can join B now. It just needs to post to spoon-business that it has decided to become a faction. On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Warrigal > wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: > > We should so join this, right? > > I imagine it would be similar if Agora an

Re: DIS: Internomic2

I accept that comment. I'll think about a new ruleset and we'll see what the 'nomic landscape' looks like in a few months. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Well, Agora did the original InterNomic. I for one think that IN2's > ruleset is too

DIS: Possible Protectorate etc

A discussion I just started over at B led to the following: Warrigal: "I think it would be possible to make B Nomic a public contract without the objection of a party. This is an Agoran action, so the announcement of intent and objections both have to go to Agora; one does not need to be a player

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration

C-walker, please. C-walker On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Charles Walker < > charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I register. >> >> C-walker >> > > > Welcome. Is there any nickname you would like to use? >

DIS: Re: BUS: New player registration

Hey, I'm new here too so I don't know much, but there is this FAQ which was published a while ago: Agora Nomic FAQ last updated 4/22/09 Q. What's with the funny pronouns? A. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spivak_pronoun (Agora traditionally uses "e" as subject and "emself" as reflexive). Q.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: New player registration

Here's a greeting card to go with it: --- | | |You Play | | Nomic ? | | | |Get well | | soon... | | | --- C-walker On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:29 PM, comex wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Elliott Hird > wrote: > >> Also, something like a frui

DIS: Re: BUS: [IADoP] Anarchist Election

I endorse Tiger. C-walker On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran decision to choose the holder of the Anarchist > > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector > > is t

DIS: Re: BUS: i register

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Quazie wrote: > > i am a separate person from quazie and i register at this e-mail > > address with a nickname of 'gwen.' > > I create a White ribbon in gwen's possession. > Can I have one of those? c-walke

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: i register

Oh, thanks. C-walker On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Charles Walker > wrote: > >> I create a White ribbon in gwen's possession. > > > > Can I have one of those? > > You gained one when you registe

DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic relations

InterNomic II already knows ;) C-walker On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > > I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of Internomic II > > to Neutral. > Without objection, I do

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nomic relations

Oh, sorry. Normally I get an email when someone requests membership. I've accepted your application, just remember to log in before you try and post. C-walker On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 13:35 +0100, Charles Walker wrote: > > InterNo

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2452 assigned to Yally

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > The archives should be molded to fit the needs of the game, not the game > molded to fit the needs of the archives. > > I would agree with that if there seemed to be any point in using plain text attachments.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2452 assigned to Yally

Oh, sorry. I didn't know that. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > There was in that circumstance. The puzzle required tab characters to > work properly and they were being dropped. As a result, it had to be > sent as an attachment. > -- C-walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Ain't no party like a C# party

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > > > I initiate a Call of Equity regarding this action. As Murphy has > already been the contestmaster you SHALL NOT flip the contestmaster to > em. > > (When it comes to rules the easy way to do this is to publish an NoV, > but I don't think

DIS: Proto: Senators

Proto: (AI = 2) In the rule "The Senate" replace A Senator is any first-class player who has been registered continuously for the immediately preceding sixty days. with A Senator is a first-class player who meets one or more of the following criteria: 1) They have been continuously registered

Fwd: DIS: Proto: Senators

I don't think this worked first time round, so: -- Forwarded message -- From: Charles Walker Date: Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:47 PM Subject: DIS: Proto: Senators To: agora-discussion Proto: (AI = 2) In the rule "The Senate" replace A Senator is any first-class

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Legislative Dominance

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Taral wrote: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > >> Oh bribery proposals are cute. It's a good test every so often to see > >> if the current players are a group of voters you want to be playing a > game > >> with. A

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Census

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Taral wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > Or we could just... you know... change the quorum rules. > > Or the activity rules. In B nomic, one is only "active" in a sense if > one has voted in the previous week. > > -- > Taral >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: zeckalpha is to be registered.

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote: > zeckalpha is to be registered. > Welcome. You may find the following useful if you've never played before: [ With thanks to Murphy ] Agora Nomic FAQ last updated 4/22/09 Q. What's with the funny pronouns? A. http://en.wikipedia.org/

DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador] Foreign Relations

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > [NOTE: In order to aid other officers who need to know whether > Ambassador duties have been done or not, I'm now adding them to the > history of this report.] > > Foreign relations No matter what I do, this report /always/ flips every nomic-

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [IBA] Motion to Amend

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote: > >> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in > >> diff format). The eligible vot

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: We Should Have Done This Long Ago

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Quazie wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:35, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: > >>> Get off my lawn! Even I lurked for a month or two :P > >> > >> I didn't. Registered wit

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Senators

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Benjamin Caplan < celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Charles Walker wrote: > > A player CAN cause another person to cease to be a Senator with Senator > > Consent. > > Presumably this is supposed to mean "with something like Ag

DIS: proto: Constituencies

{ AI 2, II 2 [ This allows players to choose "Representatives" through contracts, who can vote on their behalf in decisions Create a new power 2 Rule: {{ A Constituency is a public contract identifying itself as such. A Constituency requires at least 3 parties. A player SHALL NOT attempt to bec

Re: DIS: proto: Constituencies

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Charles Walker < charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: > { AI 2, II 2 > [ This allows players to choose "Representatives" through contracts, who > can vote on their behalf in decisions > I didn't finish this description, s

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Airstrip One] Flight Schedule

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > c-walker wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ed Murphy > > wrote: > > > > Flight Schedule > > > > > > If I haven't already, I join this contract. > > It lets you, but you don't need to; props are ava

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan > Kilhamn wrote: > > 2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein : > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn < > jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> The following proposal constitutes

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Airstrip One] Flight Schedule

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > If I haven't already, I join this contract. >> >> You can't join this contract. > R2198: If a contract does not purport to regulate becoming a party to it, then any person CAN become a party to it by announcement. -- C-walker, who clearl

Re: DIS: Distributability?

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Taral wrote: > What about making Distributability like NoVs, where it's with N > support? You get one free proposal per week... Great idea. -- C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.

Re: DIS: Proto: Proposal Review Board

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Benjamin Caplan < celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > > 2009/6/10 Sean Hunt : > >> I like. I think it should be 2 elected + the Promotor. > > > > Promotor + 1 prerogative + 1 elected? > > At this point, perhaps the three positions should

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Actual Anarchist Election

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein > wrote: > > I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Anarchist > > office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector > > is the IADoP, and the valid optio

DIS: proto: proto pool

I transfer a prop from myself to BobTHJ because I really like his Proposal Review Board idea, and I've stolen parts of it for this proto: { Create a proto pool. Only disinterested proposals can be submitted directly to the proposal pool; all others must first be submitted to the proto pool. Proto

DIS: Agora-B Economics

I submit the following two protos. The first is intended to be adopted in Agora, the other in B. Comments welcome. { It's Greek to Me AI = 1, II = 1 Adopt a new power 1 Rule: {{ Kolios is a type of asset and a currency, tracked by the Accountor. A player CAN destroy a Note to create 5 Kolios

Re: DIS: proto: proto pool

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 10:47 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> Add a penalty for authoring proposals that are rejected to the current >> distributability system and the problem goes away without an extra >> layer of bureaucracy. > > What about a sor

DIS: Re: BUS: Gramatically Correct

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Walker wrote: >> I was just trying to keep the Janitor in work, honest. >> >> I submit the following proposal and intend to make it Distributable >> without objection: > > A

DIS: Re: BUS: The Livenomic Partnership

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, >> C-walker wrote: >>> The LNP intends, with Agoran Consent, to register. >> >> I support. >> > > Havi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: IBA Motions

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:37 PM, comex wrote: > Proposal: Fix R107 (AI=3, II=0) > { > Amend Rule 107 by replacing "correctly identified" with "publicly > identified". I'm pretty sure that the identification should still be correct as well as public. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

DIS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Deck of Government report

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >       === Grand Poobah's Deck of Government report === Suggestion for addition to this and all other card reports: what cards actually do. I can never remember. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Cards

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/9/5 Charles Walker : >> I spend Distrib-u-matic to make the proposal FIXME Distributable. >> >> I go on hold. >> >> I audit myself. >> >> I come off hold. > > This destroys a bunc

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2674 assigned to woggle

; >>> >> >> I judge GUILTY / SILENCE. >> > I appeal this case. By custom Agora has permitted new officers a full > ASAP period to fulfill outstanding obligations. Game custom does not take precedence over the text of the rules. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

DIS: Re: BUS: Supersize

On 11/09/2009, comex wrote: > I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's contestmaster to > me. > I intend, without three objections, to change Contract B's threshold > index to 70. Contract B? -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

DIS: Re: BUS: BobTHJ's Actions (automated)

whether ais523 was dealt the card in the first place, and if e was, whether it was legal. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

DIS: Re: BUS: Ambassador Stuff

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/12 Charles Walker : >> I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of #nomirc on >> Freenode to Neutral. > > I object; from what I hear its players are a little incompetent at IRC. I don't see how

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Ambassador Stuff

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > 2009/9/12 Charles Walker : >> I don't see how this is a valid objection. Agora should be open to >> diplomatic relations with heathen nomics as well as the more refined >> ones. > > Well, true, I guess it is Ne

DIS: A Criminal Problem

ets (maybe just cards or just Rule-defined assets). Comments? -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

DIS: Attn. Wooble, coppro

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> chamber: democratic >> ai: 3.0 >> interest: 1 >> proposer: coppro >> coauthors: >> title: FIXME >> submit_date: 2009-08-

Re: DIS: Attn. Wooble, coppro

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Charles Walker > wrote: >> Wooble, have you admitted or denied this CoE? I can't seem to find I >> reply and I thought it would be best to point it out before you >> distribut

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2677 assigned to Pavitra

related criminal CFJs brought against me. I repeat my argument for GUILTY in both of these cases. While BobTHJ's reports have indirectly been found to be correct, they were still misleading in that they made no reference to the ambiguity surrounding my card ownership. -- C-walker (Charles Walker)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A Minor Change

c wrote: > Charles Walker wrote: >> I change my nickname to Walker. > > So, you subtracted me? Yeah, sorry. -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [IADoP] Insulator Election

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Charles Walker wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> >>> This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the >>> holder of the office of Insulator. For this

Re: DIS: Notes on last automated action e-mail

are only awarded for first registration. -- Charles Walker

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Grand Poobah] Caste report

gt; it tends to get rather muddled... Luckily, it's pragmatised; you can > deduce it merely by watching activations and inactivations and the > behaviour of the Herald. I'm not sure I want to though. NttDF? -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: IBA Stuff

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:48, Charles Walker > wrote: >> I deposit 3 * X Crop for 300zm. > > This fails, you have no X crops to deposit. comex, I believe your 'Ask Bob' finction is broken: BobTHJ's

DIS: Re: BUS: Card cleanout

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > I play Presto! on one of Walker's Discard Pickings. > I play Discard Picking to gain Presto! > I play Presto! on Walker's Discard Picking. I spent both of my Discard Pickings recently. I'm not sure if this affects anything. -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Audit timing

tly the only dealer, are you suggesting that you might act in an underhand manner when performing audits? :P -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Roger Hicks wrote: > ais523 >   Majority Leader > Total: 1, Hand Limit: 5 Major Arcana cards do not affect Hand Limits. -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Scrolls of Agora

coppro wrote: > Charles Walker wrote: >> BobTHJ wrote: >>> >>> ais523 >>>  Majority Leader >>> Total: 1, Hand Limit: 5 >> >> Major Arcana cards do not affect Hand Limits. >> > They do, however, BobTHJ's reports are somewhat mis

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Chamber (Caste Replacement)

e colours are a reference to the three powers in UK parliament: the House of Commons (which has green benches), the House of Lords (which has red benches) and the Crown, which I thought was best represented by Purple. I wouldn't necessarily be against a proposal to change Purple to Blue, or any other colour, though. -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Coauthor rewards

ach earn one draw from the Change >      Deck. I suggest this wording: When an interested proposal is adopted, its author earns a number of draws from the Change Deck equal to the interest index of the proposal, and the coauthors of the proposal who are players (if any) earn one draw from the Change Deck each. -- Charles Walker

DIS: AgoraHub

I've made a modest little Google site to hold my Agora-related stuff. To date, it only has my Ambassador report and a comprehensive list of links to other Agoran sites, but I hope to expand it in the future. It's at http://sites.google.com/site/agorahub/ -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Flowers for Wooble

y > breaks Rule 1607.  Better that than a stagnant pool.) > Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think it would be a lot easier for the new Promotor to catch up on Distributability of you stopped using conditional Distrib-u-matic spends. -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Motion to Effect

the Vote Collector. > The possible options are FOR and AGAINST. President c., when do you plan to resolve this motion? -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: [IBA] Report

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:45 PM, comex wrote: >> === >> >> Industrial Bank & Agora Report > CoE: You are missing my recent withdraws

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Ambassador] Foreign Relations

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Charles Walker > wrote: >> Friendly        B Nomic >>              (http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/B%20Nomic) > > I humbly request the Ambassador flip the Recognition of B

DIS: Re: BUS: The Make Someone Happy Contest

;, and instead there was some equity court-enforcible standard for awarding the points. Also, I've always wanted to see a Legalistic contest which was its own contestmaster. Is that possible under the current Rules? -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: Bills of Attainder

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:27 AM, comex wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Taral wrote: >> They suck. That is all. -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: A different rule-making game that might be of interest.

is for that. The First Speaker emself had some related ideas: http://axiom.anu.edu.au/~michaeln/agora/subgame-manifesto.html -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Punish Walker

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > With this mild punishment, e may learn that such annoying actions are > not within the spirit of the game. Do you seriously think this is in the spirit of the game? -- Charles Walker

Re: DIS: A different rule-making game that might be of interest.

be a good basis for that. The First Speaker emself had some >>> related ideas: >>> http://axiom.anu.edu.au/~michaeln/agora/subgame-manifesto.html >>> >> FRC. > > BlogNomic. I mean a nomic within a nomic. Read Micheal's manifesto. -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 6533-6541

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:13 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: >> 6537  0   1.0  Walker              R2215 Fix > PRESENT; what would this do? Correct a grammar/ spelling mistake? -- Charles Walker

DIS: Re: BUS: Decruft Speed

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker > wrote: >> For each of the following proposals, I intend, without 3 objections, >> to make it Distributable: >> >> Anarchy Anarchy > > I object > >>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Decruft Speed

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker >>> wrote: >>>> For each of th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Decruft Speed

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/10/22 Roger Hicks : >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:38, Charles Walker >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker >>&g

  1   2   3   4   5   >