On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:25, Charles Walker > <charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:18, Charles Walker >>> <charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> For each of the following proposals, I intend, without 3 objections, >>>> to make it Distributable: >>>> >>>> Anarchy Anarchy >>> >>> I object >>> >>>> Abduct the Aliens >>> >>> I object >>> >>>> Invasion Alert Level Green >>> >>> I object >>> >>>> End of the Accountor >>> >>> I object >> >> I can understand some of these objections, but why are you against >> repealing a Rule which has only an unused definition in it? >> > I thought it was a useful definition, even if it is currently unusued.
How can something that isn't used possibly be useful? -- Charles Walker
