On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > If I have a Distrib-u-Matic, then I play it to make this proposal > distributable. > > (If card recordkeeping isn't caught up soon, then I suggest a deputy > Promotor distribute everything and plead for DISCHARGE if e thereby > breaks Rule 1607. Better that than a stagnant pool.) >
Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think it would be a lot easier for the new Promotor to catch up on Distributability of you stopped using conditional Distrib-u-matic spends. -- Charles Walker
