Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>>> Fails, the LPRS is not a contract.
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>> I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
>>>
>>> With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
>>> intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>> Fails, the LPRS is not a contract.
>
> I'm not sure I agree
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
>>
>> With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
>> intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>
> Fails, the LPRS is not a contract.
I'm not sure I agree. Reading R1728(b), it's not cl
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
>
> With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
> intend with Agoran Consent to register.
Fails, the LPRS is not a contract.
ehird wrote:
> On 2009-06-17, Ed Murphy wrote:
[snip]
>> (The FAQ should probably include entries for "AGAINT", "nkep",
>> and "zoop", if it doesn't already. Any others?)
> Retarded monkies and The Retarded Monkey School of Rule
> Interpretation!
I expect those would be reasonably obvious from
G. wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> c-walker wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>>> I object. What exactly is the po
Retarded monkies and The Retarded Monkey School of Rule Interpretation!
On 2009-06-17, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>>> flip the contestmaster of the below contra
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 15:58, Benjamin
Caplan wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>> {
>> The name of this public contract is the Points Relay Service II. Any
>> person CAN joi
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> c-walker wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>>>
>>> I object. What exact
Roger Hicks wrote:
> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
> {
> The name of this public contract is the Points Relay Service II. Any
> person CAN join or leave this contract. Any party CAN amend this
> contract
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>>> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>>
>> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun in
c-walker wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>
> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun intended).
To zoop around the rules' restrictio
BobTHJ wrote:
> Point Vouchers are an asset whose recordkeepor is the contestmaster.
> There are two types of Point Vouchers: X and Y. Point Vouchers of the
> same type are fungible. Point Vouchers may be abbreviated as PVX and
> PVY respectively.
You abbreviate the latter as PRY in the rest of t
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:09, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/17 C-walker
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> > I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>> > flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>>
>> I object. What exactly is
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:50, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jonatan
> Kilhamn wrote:
>> Trading with points can already be done, however, at least in the same
>> limited fashion as the contract would allow - no more then 5 points
>> from any player or to any player per week.
>
>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jonatan
Kilhamn wrote:
> Trading with points can already be done, however, at least in the same
> limited fashion as the contract would allow - no more then 5 points
> from any player or to any player per week.
No they can't, because Rule 2166 (Assets) states that
2009/6/17 Roger Hicks
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:50, C-walker
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> >> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
> >> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
> >
> > I object. What exactly i
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM,
C-walker wrote:
> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun intended).
The same as the last PRS; to subvert the democratic process to create
a market for a scarce resource.
If you want it to be easier to transfer points (and it is already
easier than it was wh
2009/6/17 C-walker
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> > I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
> > flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>
> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun intended).
>
> --
> C-walker
Ensuring C no
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:50, C-walker wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to
>> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ.
>
> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun intended).
>
A con
20 matches
Mail list logo
