Sean Hunt wrote:
> Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> I agree to the {}-delimited contract below.
>>
>> With the majority consent of the set of myself, I cause the LPRS to
>> intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>
> Fails, the LPRS is not a contract.
I'm not sure I agree. Reading R1728(b), it's not clear to me whether the
initiator necessarily must have been a person at the time of intent, or
if it's sufficient for the em to be a person when the decision is resolved.
I'll have it re-intend once it's a person, to reduce ambiguity.
