G. wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Ed Murphy wrote: >> c-walker wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I agree to the below contract. I intend without three objections to >>>> flip the contestmaster of the below contract to BobTHJ. >>> I object. What exactly is the point? (No pun intended). >> To zoop around the rules' restrictions... > > Hmm. I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.
Well, it's at least trending toward a root-word for "perform an action enabled by a contract that is effectively equivalent to a different action prevented by the rules". We've had: zoop ~= initiate a (criminal, appeal) case by announcement (Note Exchange) ~= transfer a Note DiSu-zoop ~= make a proposal distributable by announcement
