Well, presumably you wouldn't want to "capture" your own land units, as you
lose ownership upon capture. You could create public land units inside an
encircling group and then reap the rewards, but you would barely turn any
profit - you'd have to spend lots of apples running around & creating the
l
On Mon, 7 May 2018, Corona wrote:
Huh? In Japanese and Korean Go you score points (that is, your opponent
loses points, which is equivalent) for capturing stones.
Yes, but not for making a move such that your *own* stones get captured.
And don't you think it's a shame that there are all thes
Huh? In Japanese and Korean Go you score points (that is, your opponent
loses points, which is equivalent) for capturing stones.
And don't you think it's a shame that there are all these Go simulation
rules like Transfiguration and alternating land type, and the only way Land
Types are relevant to
On Sun, 6 May 2018, Corona wrote:
Land Unit A is said to be connected to Land Unit B if it is possible to
reach B by moving only to adjacent Land Units of the same Land Type,
starting from A.
Change "to" to "via", otherwise this does not allow you to go the
last step to B if it's not the same
On Sat, May 5, 2018, 16:27 Corona wrote:
> Oh yeah, I didn't notice that was redundant. I'll make a revision once
> everyone has had a chance to comment.
>
> As for (Full) Groups: Right now, (0,-1) and (0,-2), for example, form a
> Group, as does any subset of the white Land Units on the "left" s
Oh yeah, I didn't notice that was redundant. I'll make a revision once
everyone has had a chance to comment.
As for (Full) Groups: Right now, (0,-1) and (0,-2), for example, form a
Group, as does any subset of the white Land Units on the "left" side of the
map. However, in Go, one considers a grou
Comments inline
On Sat, May 5, 2018, 02:09 Corona wrote:
> Well, nobody plays Go on Arcadia, preferring ease of movement instead.
> Boring!
>
> I create the proposal "go, Go!" with the following text; text enclosed in
> square brackets is not part of the proposal:
>
> [This proposal implements a
On second thought, I'll change the reward to 3 coins, 3 apples/Land Unit,
as you can expend a lot of apples trying to capture even a single Land
Unit. Or maybe give a bonus for facilities destroyed (40% of total cost)?
~Corona
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Corona wrote:
> Well, nobody plays
8 matches
Mail list logo
