On 3/16/23 18:54, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Don't use a website, just use the standard random choice mechanism.
I think the website is clever here because it gives a daily roll that
each person can monitor to determine when it's their turn (or form a
contract with others to split
On 3/16/23 18:18, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'd like to try out and practice Proposal-making with something modest. I'd
> greatly appreciate feedback.
>
>
> Title: Chicken Dinner
>
> Adoption index: 1.0
>
> Author: Yachay
>
> Coauthors:
>
> Body:
>
> {
>
> Create a new Power 1.
On 3/16/23 17:18, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Title: Chicken Dinner
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Yachay
Coauthors:
Body:
{
Create a new Power 1.0 rule that says:
"If this rule has existed in the Ruleset for 7 days or more, then any
Player may perform a Chicken Dinner by an
I'd like to try out and practice Proposal-making with something modest. I'd
greatly appreciate feedback.
Title: Chicken Dinner
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Yachay
Coauthors:
Body:
{
Create a new Power 1.0 rule that says:
"If this rule has existed in the Ruleset for 7 days or more, then any
That's definitely an approach worth looking at, I think! Earlier
today we started talking on Discord about something that's along those
lines, I was going to post a draft sometime later to kick around if
nobody beats me to it (not to cut off discussion in the mean time of
course :) ). -G.
On T
On 3/16/23 16:53, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
Ah, I see. Just throwing ideas here but, perhaps immediate wins can be
replaced with "victory declarations" which call for a (one week long?)
investigation into the win.
After the week, that's that and, if the investigation is favora
Ah, I see. Just throwing ideas here but, perhaps immediate wins can be
replaced with "victory declarations" which call for a (one week long?)
investigation into the win.
After the week, that's that and, if the investigation is favorable, you get
the actual win and the rest of things trigger.
On T
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Couldn't past wins be outright ruled somehow to not exist anymore if
> they're found to be in violation of something concerning it?
There's a couple separate issues - one part is just saying "that win
didn't count as
Couldn't past wins be outright ruled somehow to not exist anymore if
they're found to be in violation of something concerning it?
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/15/23 23:53, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> So,
Appreciated!
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, nix via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/16/23 13:09, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
>
>> Hello, as per Rule 869/51, I express that I intend to be a player for
>> Agora
>> nomic under the name of "Yachay Wayllukuq"
On 3/15/23 23:53, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
So, it looks like infractions cause blots to appear at the time of
Investigation, not at the time of noting nor the time of the crime, which
means that, potentially, players can win by cheating, then get the blots
after they win. A simp
11 matches
Mail list logo
