Couldn't past wins be outright ruled somehow to not exist anymore if they're found to be in violation of something concerning it?
On Thursday, March 16, 2023, nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 3/15/23 23:53, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote: > >> So, it looks like infractions cause blots to appear at the time of >> Investigation, not at the time of noting nor the time of the crime, which >> means that, potentially, players can win by cheating, then get the blots >> after they win. A simple (yet dangerous) retroactive text addition >> follows: >> would this fix it? >> > > This is a very common discussion, and in fact sparked some Discord > discussion that I wanted to bring to the list. Retroactive blots are messy > because they don't just impact winning but also voting strength. Other > potential solutions include a timer, illegal actions preventing wins (which > is similar to retroactive, but with a bit less recalculation to do), and > the current system of just hoping nobody intentionally cheats to win > because that's very rude. > > -- > nix > Prime Minister, Collector, Herald > >
