On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Judge Murphy's Arguments:
> >>
> >> I interpret "modify" as limited to changing an existing value, not
> >> initializing an aspect that previously lacked a value.
> >>
> >
> > Isn't this in direct
G. wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Judge Murphy's Arguments:
>>
>> I interpret "modify" as limited to changing an existing value, not
>> initializing an aspect that previously lacked a value.
>>
>
> Isn't this in direct conflict with a judgement about a recent scam
> failure, wh
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Judge Murphy's Arguments:
>
> I interpret "modify" as limited to changing an existing value, not
> initializing an aspect that previously lacked a value.
>
Isn't this in direct conflict with a judgement about a recent scam
failure, where "modify" or a sy
omd wrote:
> It would be cool if the map were adjusted to conform to the Map of Agora.
I did try to make it roughly the same shape. If your ASCII-art-fu is
superior to mine, then by all means take a crack at it.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I submit the following AI-2 proposal, "Bring Back Points":
Meh.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> >> The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
>> >> an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
>> >> Speaker, then the player who was most rec
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> For what it's worth, it was ruled in CFJ 2974 that you could satisfy
>> the requirement by visiting a web site (if you understood Russian, but
>> presumably also if you used Google Translate).
>
> For what it's also worth, I picked up a physic
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Create a rule titled "The Resource Map of Agora" with this text:
>
> *-* *-*
> / \ / \
> *-* A *-* *-* B *-*
> / \ / \ / \ / \
> *-* C *-*
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:36 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > This is quite different from the Vladivostok Telephone Directory
> > situation, which as far as I could tell was almost completely
> > impossible,
>
> For what it's worth, it was ruled in CFJ 2974 that you coul
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:36 PM, ais523 wrote:
> This is quite different from the Vladivostok Telephone Directory
> situation, which as far as I could tell was almost completely
> impossible,
For what it's worth, it was ruled in CFJ 2974 that you could satisfy
the requirement by visiting a web si
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> A player can spend a Promise in eir own possession to cause its author
> to publish its text, as if e'd sent its text to a public forum as a
> message with no further context.
Leading to pledges as tradeable bonds or person-backed currencies
with valuse set o
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:44 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> [As long as a lot of protos are springing up, here's mine to throw
> into the ring.
May as well submit the proto I've been wondering about. This isn't so
much to replace economy, or to add a subgame, as to add something
rules-bizarre and like
On 11-03-20 01:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
* Each productive color is assigned to one rim point
* Silver is assigned to four rim points
* Each rim point is assigned at most one color
I would prefer better terminology for harbours; also rules for houw they
work.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> == CFJ 2977 ==
> MRW and Associates is a second-class person.
I may be missing something. Can someone explain what rule of at least
power 2 (see R2150) allegedly defines an entity like this one
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> >> Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
> >> Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
> >
> > Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
> > so that we could see if all Agorans
G. wrote:
>> Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
>> Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
>
> Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
> so that we could see if all Agorans who didn't support could be found
> guilty of this.
Thanks for the info! =)
~ Roujo
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Roujo wrote:
>
>> I vote FOR all of these a number of times equal to my voting limit.
>>
>> Question: If I just say "I vote FOR all of these", do I implicitely do
>> it "a number of times equal to my voting limit
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 18:29 +, Charles Walker wrote:
> > I agree with all that, but you seem to be having a debate based on the
> > assumption that increasing the number of active players in an
> > impossible task. Would it really be that hard?
>
> Well,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> > > Legal requirements that are sometimes impossible to comply with are more
> > > fun.
> >
> > Er, didn't you recently quit the game citing the opposite opin
[As long as a lot of protos are springing up, here's mine to throw
into the ring. At present, it is the BASIS of production only,
it can be linked to other protos to specify what the resources can
be actually spent on (votes, ribbons, etc).].
The reason for this is we've tried many types of res
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 18:29 +, Charles Walker wrote:
> I agree with all that, but you seem to be having a debate based on the
> assumption that increasing the number of active players in an
> impossible task. Would it really be that hard?
Well, the point is that it's entirely plausible, and th
On 20 March 2011 18:26, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
>> > Legal requirements that are sometimes impossible to comply with are more
>> > fun.
>>
>> Er, didn't you recently quit the game citing the opposite opinion?
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> > Legal requirements that are sometimes impossible to comply with are more
> > fun.
>
> Er, didn't you recently quit the game citing the opposite opinion?
I was wondering about that. I think it's mo
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> [Just the generic Catan framework for now; needs to be tied into buying
> extra votes or something. Does not yet include cards, or the active
> effects of rolling a 7.]
Looks like we're mutually thinking along resource lines again, anyway.
I admit I'm n
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, ais523 wrote:
> Legal requirements that are sometimes impossible to comply with are more
> fun.
Er, didn't you recently quit the game citing the opposite opinion?
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
> {{Enact the following power-1 rule, titled "Dragons":
Ugh, pointless trinkets again. Can we have something different?
I've been playing with a Common Pool Resources proto. Common Pool
Resources at first glance look like one of those Farming Games we
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> As I'm sure all have noticed, Agoran activity is very low. When I first
> joined the game only two short years ago, the game was very active and
> fantastically entertaining for all involved. However, that is not so much the
> case anymore, as Agora
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Charles Walker wrote:
> Would I be right in saying that the class of a crime no longer has any effect
> on the ninny (i.e. that they no longer receive a worse punishment for a
> greater class of crime)?
They could be seen as Guideline numbers for Fine or Time Out.
As such
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
>
> > On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
> >>an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
> >>Speaker, then the player who was most
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to intend to
> > deputize to publish the Registrar's report.
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deputize for
> > the Registrar to publish the Registrar's re
On 20 March 2011 16:18, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>> > It's like a proactive Greetor.
>> >
>> > Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
>> > of active play
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:18, ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker
>> wrote:
>> > It's like a proactive Greetor.
>> >
>> > Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
>> > of acti
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > It's like a proactive Greetor.
> >
> > Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
> > of active players?
> >
> > Charles Walker
> > Sent on Mobile
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 05:14, Charles Walker
wrote:
> It's like a proactive Greetor.
>
> Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
> of active players?
>
> Charles Walker
> Sent on Mobile
I wouldn't say legal, but certainly players should look at the
accomplishm
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> Would I be right in saying that the class of a crime no longer has any
> effect on the ninny (i.e. that they no longer receive a worse punishment for
> a greater class of crime)?
The judge might take the class of the crime into account when
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
>> CoE:
>>
>>> Date of this report: Sat 19 Mar 2011
>>
>> Was published on 20 Mar.
>
> Not in eir time zone.
R1023.
Would I be right in saying that the class of a crime no longer has any
effect on the ninny (i.e. that they no longer receive a worse punishment for
a greater class of crime)?
--
Charles Walker
It's like a proactive Greetor.
Do you intend the office to have a legal requirement to increase the number
of active players?
Charles Walker
Sent on Mobile
On 20 Mar 2011 03:30, "Aaron Goldfein" wrote:
> As I'm sure all have noticed, Agoran activity is very low. When I first
> joined the game on
38 matches
Mail list logo
