Warrigal wrote:
> The default penalty for violating a power-1 rule is two rests.
No, it's one rest. Rule 2230, excerpt:
When a NoV becomes Closed, a number of
Rests are created in the possession of the Accused equal to the
Class of the specified Crime,
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 21:36 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> >> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
> >> existence, I think] called The Robot...
> >
> > Warrigal's one where caus
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
>> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
>> existence, I think] called The Robot...
>
> Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
No, H. Sgeo's one where all events take
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote:
> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not
> existence, I think] called The Robot...
Warrigal's one where causality works backwards?
I'm not convinced that is actually a nomic.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:12 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> === CFJ 2849 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> The Rule enacted by Proposal 6808 refers to coppro when it
>> speaks of "The Robot".
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2842
>
> == Criminal Case 2842 (Interest Index = 2) ===
>
> Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2143 by failing to publish an ATC's
> report in the week starting A
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 19:32 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I just want to know where the On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 22:22 -0700, Ed
> Murphy line came from, because the message
> in the References: header didn't contain that address at all. Doesn't
> your email client know how to quote things?
It quo
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:26 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> ais523 wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 22:22 -0700, Ed Murphy
>> > wrote:
>> > (snip)
>> >
>> > CoE: Murphy's email address is not , as
>> > social.rr.com does not exist (at least not publ
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 22:22 -0700, Ed Murphy
> > wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > CoE: Murphy's email address is not , as
> > social.rr.com does not exist (at least not publically); emails to that
> > address bounce, and it doesn
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I contest this NoV. I initiate a criminal CFJ regarding this NoV and
>> submit it to the Justiciar.
>
> I assign this CFJ to Murphy, as I think e's the only eligible Judge.
You also need to assign it an ID number (I sug
Wooble wrote:
> There's also no way to become Associate Director of Personnel,
> although it might be considered a reasonable synonym of its successor
> office.
cf. CFJ 1672
omd wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> omd wrote:
>>>
>>> NoV: Murphy violated Power-1 Rule 2224 by setting this proposal's
>>> Interest Index to 0, although its effects are not limited to
>>> correcting errors and/or ambiguities.
>>
>> I contest this NoV. The sole effe
ais523 wrote:
> I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players.
"Who is Number One?"
"Michael Norrish is, Number Six."
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
>> And, from the rulest of 5 years ago today:
>>
>> Proposal: Church and State (AI=1, II=0)
>> {{{
>> Enact a new rule entitled "Church and State" reading
>> A cardinal is an active, ready player who is neither the current
>> Speake
Yally wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 16:15, ais523 wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 22:09 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>>> The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
>>> For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
>>> start of it has earned
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
> > I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> > could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This
> > is also arguably a bug in rule 2161.
>
> proto-proto:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
> I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This
> is also arguably a bug in rule 2161.
proto-proto: Upon a judicial finding that an entity has a confusing name,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
> (I can't afford to make this proposal Distributable right now, but it
> can wait until next week without issue.)
I'd pay for it if you hadn't just told us not to. -G.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> >> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
> >
> > No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
>
> At least fix the spelling of "gardener"
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
>> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
>
> No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
At least fix the spelling of "gardener".
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:17 -0400, Warrigal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Grand Vizier: 3
> > Head Gardner: 3
> > Crown Prince: 1
>
> Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
No; they're equal in the original proposal. And 2 is the default.
--
ais523
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Grand Vizier: 3
> Head Gardner: 3
> Crown Prince: 1
Do you mean "Head Gardener: 2"?
—Proofreader Tanner L. Swett
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 21:48 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Distributed Proposal 6830", AI 2, II
> 1:
It may be more interesting if this one stays undistributable until the
actual 6830 is distributed, in which case there is a nice clash between
rules 2161 and 1586 that
On 27 August 2010 22:15, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 22:09 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
>> For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
>> start of it has earned one farad.
>>
>> I award
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> The shuttle has completed two very short journeys in quick succession.
> For each journey, every player who was active and not the enemy at the
> start of it has earned one farad.
>
> I award myself two capacitors for being onboard at the e
On 27 August 2010 22:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
>> On 26 August 2010 23:22, Keba wrote:
>> > I submit a Proposal "Journey fix" (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
>>
>> I'd personally prefer a fix that made the first wormhole explicitly a
>> "Shuttle
> And, from the rulest of 5 years ago today:
>
> Proposal: Church and State (AI=1, II=0)
> {{{
> Enact a new rule entitled "Church and State" reading
> A cardinal is an active, ready player who is neither the current
> Speaker nor the Associate Director of Personnel.
>
> While there
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:41 AM, ais523 wrote:
> Five times, I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's ergs.
I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests.
I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests.
I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests.
G. wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal: Frankenstein Destroyers rule!
>
> Secret Societies are Treason, Citizen. What's the handshake?
Why, I wouldn't know /that/, I'm a loyal citizen I'll have you know!
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Frankenstein Destroyers rule!
Secret Societies are Treason, Citizen. What's the handshake?
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 02:42 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Double Oops (AI=3.1, II=0, Distributable)
> {{{
> Amend Rule 1551 (Ratification) by replacing
>Ratifying a public document is secured.
> with
>Ratifying a public document is secured at power 3.1.
> }}}
Triple oops, as
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 23:41 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>
> Judge G.'s Arguments:
>
> The various ribbon colors are defined fairly indirectly. That is,
> in R2199, ribbons are defined in general, and the existence of specific
32 matches
Mail list logo
