On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:26 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:22 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> ais523 wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 22:22 -0700, Ed Murphy <emurph...@social.rr.com> >> > wrote: >> > (snip) >> > >> > CoE: Murphy's email address is not <emurph...@social.rr.com>, as >> > social.rr.com does not exist (at least not publically); emails to that >> > address bounce, and it doesn't have a DNS entry. (I appreciate that the >> > emails apparently from that address probably are from Murphy; but the >> > address itself is implicitly a lie.) >> >> "socal" (for Southern California), not "social"; are you sure you've >> tested emurph...@socal.rr.com? I submit this as gratuitous evidence >> in the relevant criminal case against Registrar Wooble. > > Hmm, I seem to be inherently incapable of reading your email address.
I just want to know where the On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 22:22 -0700, Ed Murphy <emurph...@social.rr.com> line came from, because the message in the References: header didn't contain that address at all. Doesn't your email client know how to quote things?
