On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote:
> I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm
> could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This
> is also arguably a bug in rule 2161.
proto-proto: Upon a judicial finding that an entity has a confusing name,
the judge CAN make a judicial declaration of a reasonably appropriate non-
confusing name for the entity; the judge SHOULD choose the most recent
non-confusing name for the entity, giving credence to the entity's wishes
or self-declarations, if doing so in fact resolves the confusion. It may
be reasonable for the judge to find that previous actions using the
confusing name as a referent were ineffective due to ambiguity.
-G.
