On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, ais523 wrote: > > I note in passing that scams of the type that coppro is attempting atm > > could, in future, be resolved by assigning ID numbers to players. This > > is also arguably a bug in rule 2161. > > proto-proto: Upon a judicial finding that an entity has a confusing name, > the judge CAN make a judicial declaration of a reasonably appropriate non- > confusing name for the entity; the judge SHOULD choose the most recent > non-confusing name for the entity, giving credence to the entity's wishes > or self-declarations, if doing so in fact resolves the confusion. It may > be reasonable for the judge to find that previous actions using the > confusing name as a referent were ineffective due to ambiguity.
I have a sudden urge to call you Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt). -- ais523
