On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 21:36 -0400, Warrigal wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 20:36 -0400, Sgeo wrote: > >> There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not > >> existence, I think] called The Robot... > > > > Warrigal's one where causality works backwards? > > No, H. Sgeo's one where all events take place in a single sentence.
Oh, right, the nomic whose only purpose is to freeze its own ruleset. I think it may have been a nomic for an infinitesimal length of time, now it's just... a set of rules for how they might have been self-modified once, under certain circumstances, but weren't? -- ais523
