On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:12 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 17:07 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> =================== CFJ 2849 (Interest Index = 0) ==================== >> >> The Rule enacted by Proposal 6808 refers to coppro when it >> speaks of "The Robot". >> >> ======================================================================== >> >> Caller's Arguments: >> >> How does the naming clause of R1586 decide between various entities which >> existed at the time Proposal 6808 took effect? In particular, there was >> at least one Proposal with the submitted title "The Robot", coppro had >> selected "The Robot" as a nickname, and there was a public document >> submitted by G. that called itself The Robot. Does any one of these >> claimants to the name have a stronger claim for applying R1586? >> >> ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous: comex has been consistently using the name TheRobot on > ##nomic (a discussion forum) for several days now. > > -- > ais523 > >
There is a nomic [of admittedly questionable nomicness, but not existence, I think] called The Robot...
