comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I would express the standard as follows: If
>>
>> a) it can be understood based solely on a typical player's
>> i) knowledge of eir native language (in Agora, English has always
>> been typical) and
>> ii)
Goethe wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
>
> AVPR GEL, OHG V GNXR GUR SBYYBJVAT NPGVBA:
(rot13: "Nice try, but I take the following action:")
> J DBMM GPS KVEHFNFOU PO UIF GPMMPXJOH TUBUFNFOU:
(rot1 or rot25: "I call for judgement on the follo
.troppus I
On 2009-03-20, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> Base64 is ridiculously well known.
>
> AVPR GEL, OHG V GNXR GUR SBYYBJVAT NPGVBA:
> J DBMM GPS KVEHFNFOU PO UIF GPMMPXJOH TUBUFNFOU:
> JXYI YI JXU IJQJUCUDJ ED MXYSX Y SQBBUT VEH ZKTWUCUDJ XUHU.
>
> -Goet
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 2009-03-20, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
ih...@normish:~$ echo 'SGVsbG8sIHdvcmxkIQ==' | base64 -d; echo
Hello, world!
ih...@normish:~$ echo 'Q0ZKOiB7VGh
On 2009-03-20, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>>> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'SGVsbG8sIHdvcmxkIQ==' | base64 -d; echo
>>> Hello, world!
>>> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=' | base64 -d;
>>> echo
>>> C
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, comex wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
>> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'SGVsbG8sIHdvcmxkIQ==' | base64 -d; echo
>> Hello, world!
>> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=' | base64 -d; echo
>> CFJ: {This CFJ exists.}
>> ih...@normish:~$
>>
>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> AAA, the only contest for which I was the Contestmaster for at least
>> 16 days in February.
>
> Oh, right. Sorry, I saw 15 points and got confused.
I believe 15 players were players of AAA
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> AAA, the only contest for which I was the Contestmaster for at least
> 16 days in February.
Oh, right. Sorry, I saw 15 points and got confused.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
No.
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I would express the standard as follows: If
>
> a) it can be understood based solely on a typical player's
> i) knowledge of eir native language (in Agora, English has always
> been typical) and
> ii) common sense (for upsi
ehird wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Ed Murphy :
>> I thought the rules contained an English-centric clause at the time, but
>> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2005-December/002501.html
>>
>> (the last SLR before CFJ 1580) says otherwise. Â Accordingly, I'll remove
>> this lat
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> The recent Spanish/Unicode incidents, IMO, provide strong evidence
> that this precedent no longer exists.
The unicode was sent in a format that any modern mail program would
display in a readable manner. The Spanish was probably reasonably
2009/3/19 Ed Murphy :
> I thought the rules contained an English-centric clause at the time, but
> http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2005-December/002501.html
>
> (the last SLR before CFJ 1580) says otherwise. Accordingly, I'll remove
> this latest attempt from the D
Wooble wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2422
>>
>> == CFJ 2422 ==
>>
>>This CFJ exists.
>
> Mu. CFJ 1580 establishes that BASE64 messages are not
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'SGVsbG8sIHdvcmxkIQ==' | base64 -d; echo
> Hello, world!
> ih...@normish:~$ echo 'Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=' | base64 -d; echo
> CFJ: {This CFJ exists.}
> ih...@normish:~$
>
> Gratuitous arguments: I consider these enc
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> Damn, I suppose the recordkeepors of rules-defined assets no longer
> CAN generally create them (except by self-ratification, of course).
CFJ 2403 establishes that Taral had (and, for that matter, still has)
the ability to award points to you, and since the only mechanism th
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Warrigal wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> 2009/3/19 Geoffrey Spear :
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
>>> wrote:
Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
>>>
>>> I Object.
>>
>> You can't object to the creation of a
2009/3/19 Geoffrey Spear :
> Mu. CFJ 1580 establishes that BASE64 messages are not valid; CFJ1741
> clarified that a MIME message using BASE64 is valid, but the message
> in this case does not specify a MIME type and players can not be
> expected to translate gibberish into English.
'Scuse me, we
2009/3/19 Ed Murphy :
>
> Caller: ehird
>
> Judge: Wooble
> Judgement:
>
>
It's like te
2009/3/19 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
>
> I Object.
>
You can't object to the creation of a CFJ.
2009/3/19 Charles Walker :
> I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted at
> http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set of
> forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the forums
> allow for anonymous and non-member posts if you
2009/3/19 Warrigal :
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
>> We should so join this, right?
>
> I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
> or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic will not join.
>
> --Warrigal
>
I will try to get
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> We should so join this, right?
I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic will not join.
--Warrigal
2009/3/19 Charles Walker :
> I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted
> at http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set of
> forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the forums
> allow for anonymous and non-member posts if you
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
For the benefit of Murphy and/or anyone else who's interested:
ih...@normish:~$ echo 'SGVsbG8sIHdvcmxkIQ==' | base64 -d; echo
Hello, world!
ih...@normish:~$ echo 'Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=' | base64 -d
I am proud to announce the rebirth of InterNomic II. It is hosted at
http://internomic2.wikidot.com/ and includes a fully functioning set of
forums. (The groups 'General' and 'Off-topic' under 'General' in the forums
allow for anonymous and non-member posts if you want to try it out without
joining
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Sgeo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
>>
>
> What's with the strange character at the end of the subject?
>
Nevermind.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
>
What's with the strange character at the end of the subject?
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
> Q0ZKOiB7VGhpcyBDRkogZXhpc3RzLn0=
At some point, we have to stop reminding people about CFJ 1460
and just hand out boots to the head.
(My apologies if this is meant to be a non-public communication
with someone who has the key).
-Goethe
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Fails; the AAA wasn't a contest.
Damn, I suppose the recordkeepors of rules-defined assets no longer
CAN generally create them (except by self-ratification, of course).
2009/3/19 Geoffrey Spear :
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I intend to deputise for the Scorekeepor to award contestmasters for
>> February.
>
> I deputise for the Scorekeepor to award myself 15 + 15i points.
>
> I'll leave the question of whether completing the empty
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I deputise for the Scorekeepor to award myself 15 + 15i points.
>
> For which contest?
AAA, the only contest for which I was the Contestmaster for at least
16 days in February.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> If the contestmaster did not, in fact, perform the contract-defined
> duties of the contest in a timely manner, the Scorekeepor has no
> duties whatsoever with respect to that contest under R2234; e is under
> no obligation to list contests for
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I deputise for the Scorekeepor to award myself 15 + 15i points.
For which contest?
--
Taral
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
> 6155 FOR
Ineffective due to caste.
OscarMeyr wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I have castes as follows, please let me know of any errors:
>>
>> Alpha: Goethe
>>Beta: Billy Pilgrim
>> Gamma: j, OscarMeyr, Pavitra, Taral, woggle, Wooble
>> Delta: cmealerjr, Murphy
>> Epsilon: BobTHJ, comex, cop
ehird wrote:
>> 6155 O 1 1.0 comex        Refactor falsity
> FOR
These and other votes on ordinary proposals still fail due to Rests
zeroing your voting limit.
coppro wrote:
> 6147: FOR
The DB says you previously voted AGAINST this, thus this vote is
ineffective for being over your voting limit.
coppro wrote:
> I CFJ {Warrigal has, at the time of this message, voted on proposal
> 6164}, then retract any CFJs initiated by me with the same text, if any.
Including the one you just initiated?
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ {Warrigal has, at the time of this message, voted on proposal
> 6164}, then retract any CFJs initiated by me with the same text, if any.
I'm going to say that you successfully called and then retracted a CFJ.
40 matches
Mail list logo
