Sgeo wrote:
> If 6007 gets a 1.5<=VI<2.0, then this draft awards HAN when an
> equivelent proposal under the draft could only achieve a CAN..
But this proposal itself would need AI=3.
Personally, I would stick to two levels, with "service above and beyond
the call of duty" as the HAN standard, a
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bringing back the patent title of Hero, and a supplement to Prop. 6007.
>>
>> Create a rule titled: Order of the Heroes of Agora Nomic
>>
>> There exist
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bringing back the patent title of Hero, and a supplement to Prop. 6007.
>
> Create a rule titled: Order of the Heroes of Agora Nomic
>
> There exists a set of patent titles known collectively as the Order of the
> Heroes
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 18:29, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Denied. That provision was repealed from the PRS a month or two ago.
>
> Well, that's a bit broken... BobTHJ, would you be interested in
> drafting an amendment
> Wed 3 Dec 13:05:25 Pavitra awarded patent title Champion (U,V)
You don't get V for Champion. You do get it for MwP though, so it
works out. Is that a bug?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Any idea what the consequence of Obama being declared not unnaturally
> born
> > would be?
>
> Considering McCain was born in Panama at a time
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what the consequence of Obama being declared not unnaturally born
> would be?
Considering McCain was born in Panama at a time when the law
specifically made children of Americans born in other places "natural
born
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what the consequence of Obama being declared not unnaturally born
> would be?
Not unnaturally? Nothing, really.:p
ehird wrote:
> On 04/12/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ehird wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 Dec 2008, at 22:28, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>
I think the list of parties here is up to date:
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/the-werewolves-of-nomic-crossing
though the text does not yet ref
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current
> political
> > situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Charles Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 2008/12/3, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> I'd like to be able to point you to a really good article discussing the
>> finer points of the debate, but I've only found a single author who does
>> this well, and h
On Dec 3, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I vote 3 x FOR Prop. 6007 ("Thanks Murphy"). I withdraw / decline my
self-nomination for Notary.
I'm counting this as declining my nomination of you, since your
sel
On 04/12/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> On 3 Dec 2008, at 22:28, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> I think the list of parties here is up to date:
>>> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/the-werewolves-of-nomic-crossing
>>> though the text does not yet reflect changes made in No
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote 3 x FOR Prop. 6007 ("Thanks Murphy"). I withdraw / decline my
> self-nomination for Notary.
I'm counting this as declining my nomination of you, since your
self-nomination was ineffective due to being published d
On Dec 2, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 17:06, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Try # 3. Changes are to make the ONCE apply to the rule number,
and to use
X as a wild-card seed:
Within one week after an existing rule is mutated (its power is
chan
Bringing back the patent title of Hero, and a supplement to Prop. 6007.
Create a rule titled: Order of the Heroes of Agora Nomic
There exists a set of patent titles known collectively as the Order
of the Heroes of Agora Nomic (as a group, "Hero"; Bearers may be
known as "Heroes"). A person
ehird wrote:
> On 3 Dec 2008, at 22:28, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I think the list of parties here is up to date:
>> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/the-werewolves-of-nomic-crossing
>> though the text does not yet reflect changes made in November.
>
> http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/vote-market
>
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denied. That provision was repealed from the PRS a month or two ago.
Well, that's a bit broken... BobTHJ, would you be interested in
drafting an amendment to the Rules to make the PRS obsolete? It just
seems to bypass various
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:14:38 +
"Elliott Hird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04/12/2008, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current
> >> political
On 04/12/2008, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current
>> political
>> situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of debate
>> about con
2008/12/3, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current
> political
> > situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of debate
> > about constitut
On 04/12/2008, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 6007 O 1 1.5 SgeoThanks Murphy
>>
>> AGAINST
>
> You honestly don't believe that Murphy is a Heroic Notary?
>
Worth a patent title?
On Dec 2, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Taral wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW, I save the dice-roll emails in case I need to supply them as
evidence.
As a note: That doesn't quite work. You could easily request die rolls
from the server until you
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:52, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current political
> situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of debate
> about constitutional law, constitutional convention, and constitutional
>
> Wed 3 Dec 00:20:47 Unnamed pledge created by Taral
>
>> Players may add or remove an email address as a "send-only address"
>> to a specific Public Forum Without Objection. The Distributor SHALL
>> take what actions are necessary to permit (or prevent, as appropriate)
>> that address to send me
>> 6007 O 1 1.5 SgeoThanks Murphy
>
> AGAINST
You honestly don't believe that Murphy is a Heroic Notary?
You have tons of 2 crops. Care to do something with them?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The wiki should now be fully up to date, not counting (a) contracts
>> on my intent-to-terminate lists (I'll add them if there are objections)
>> and (b) short-l
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wiki should now be fully up to date, not counting (a) contracts
> on my intent-to-terminate lists (I'll add them if there are objections)
> and (b) short-lived implicit contracts such as may arise from Vote
> Market tickets.
The wiki should now be fully up to date, not counting (a) contracts
on my intent-to-terminate lists (I'll add them if there are objections)
and (b) short-lived implicit contracts such as may arise from Vote
Market tickets. Please proofread your own stuff carefully, as I
intend to attempt a blanket
Sat 1 Nov 05:34:32 PRS amended by BobTHJ
> Create a new section with the text:
> {{
> At any time an Awardee CAN request an investment of some or all of
[snip]
This becomes section 7, replacing the old section 7 that was removed
earlier in the same message.
Sat 1 Nov 12:36:15 Unnamed pledge
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I have at least one point from Werewolves; I've spent a
> lot of points since then but I still think I have at least one left.
Well then now you have none.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wiki has been updated with October's events, and some of November's
> and December's. (I'm omitting the contracts I intended to terminate, on
> the assumption that most of them will go through.)
Updated agoranomic.org wit
On 3 Dec 2008, at 23:39, Taral wrote:
I support. harblcat? Murphy?
I am willing to offer bribes to these two.
2008/12/3, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'd like to be able to point you to a really good article discussing the
> finer points of the debate, but I've only found a single author who does
> this well, and he writes in French.
I know a bit of French.
--
> Charles Schaefer
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 13:02, The PerlNomic Partnership
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^8.
> The PNP withdraws one 4 crop from the PBA for ^9.
> Using a Addition Mill, the PNP mills 4 + 4 = 8.
> The PNP deposits one 8 crop into the PBA to gain ^26.
> The
On Monday 01 December 2008 06:06:07 pm Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> Try # 3. Changes are to make the ONCE apply to the rule number,
> and to use X as a wild-card seed:
>
> Within one week after an existing rule is mutated (its power is
> changed), a Farmer CAN once Harvest the ID number of that rule,
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:25, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Caller's arguments: If the awards are treated as three ordered
>> actions, then ais523 and Pavitra got 20 points each (VALID but
>> ILLEGAL, they should have only gotten 18 each) and comex got
>> nothing (I
On 3 Dec 2008, at 22:28, Ed Murphy wrote:
I think the list of parties here is up to date:
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/the-werewolves-of-nomic-crossing
though the text does not yet reflect changes made in November.
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/vote-market
CoE: I am not a party to the
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Caller's arguments: If the awards are treated as three ordered
>> actions, then ais523 and Pavitra got 20 points each (VALID but
>> ILLEGAL, they should have only gotten 18 each) and comex got
>> nothing (INVAL
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 08:39, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I RBoA-withdraw 25 8 crops.
You get 19.
> I PBA-deposit 25 8 crops.
You deposit 19
> I transfer 308 coins to ais523.
And then you transfer only 196 coins (all you have).
BobTHJ
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 08:10, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 17:42 -0800, Charles Reiss wrote:
>> I [attempt to] purchase a Digit Ranch.
>>
> I attempt to purchase a Digit Ranch.
> I attempt to purchase a Mill.
One per week. The Mill purchase fails.
BobTHJ
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6004 D 1 2.0 woggle Pragmatize Ribbons
> 6005 D 1 2.0 Murphy Contract precedence
> 6006 D 1 2.0 Murphy Clarify equity timing
> 6007 O 1 1.5 SgeoThanks Murphy
> 6008 D 1 2.0 Perlnomic PartnershipGive pa
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:28, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember a proposal or proto to that effect, but the latest FLR
> (through Proposal 5983) doesn't show it, nor do any later proposals
> appear to cover it. Anyone want to research this one further?
>
>
Proposal 5971.
BobTHJ
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:25, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caller's arguments: If the awards are treated as three ordered
> actions, then ais523 and Pavitra got 20 points each (VALID but
> ILLEGAL, they should have only gotten 18 each) and comex got
> nothing (INVALID). If they are trea
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Caller's arguments: If the awards are treated as three ordered
> actions, then ais523 and Pavitra got 20 points each (VALID but
> ILLEGAL, they should have only gotten 18 each) and comex got
> nothing (INVALID). If they are tr
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 13:43, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:44, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Parties to this contract are Murphy, root, Zefram, Wooble, ais523,
>>> ehird, Pavitra, avpx, comex, Quazie, 0x44, Charles, and Warrigal;
>
On 3 Dec 2008, at 21:28, comex wrote:
I post the following Buy Ticket:
Cost: 5VP
Action: Become a player of B; in your request to become a player, name
{comex} as the group of players responsible for your desire to join
the game.
Note: this will gain comex m60, which e will use for purposes su
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:57, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thu 16 Oct 21:27:06 AAA amended by Pavitra
>>
>>> I intend, without 3 Objections, to amend the RBoA contract by
>>> removing the last sentence of paragraph 4. [It's obsolete now.]
>> This sentence was apparently
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 12:12 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Not sure if this changes anything at this point, but the above failed
> as ais523 didn't have any favors (e transferred them to the PBA on Nov
> 20).
What, all of them? I thought I had a spare... Maybe not, though, it gets
hard to track all th
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:33, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 22:39 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2273a
>>
>> Appeal 2273a
> I spend a Favour to call in
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:57, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thu 16 Oct 21:27:06 AAA amended by Pavitra
>
>> I intend, without 3 Objections, to amend the RBoA contract by
>> removing the last sentence of paragraph 4. [It's obsolete now.]
>
> This sentence was apparently "The SoA is the rec
Thu 16 Oct 21:27:06 AAA amended by Pavitra
> I intend, without 3 Objections, to amend the RBoA contract by
> removing the last sentence of paragraph 4. [It's obsolete now.]
This sentence was apparently "The SoA is the recordkeeper of Crops."
Fri 17 Oct 17:14:51 RBoA amended by BobTHJ
> Create
Figured some of you might be interested to know about the current political
situation here in Canada, which is giving rise to a good deal of debate
about constitutional law, constitutional convention, and constitutional
precedent.
No one really knows what the Rules really call for, or if they call
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 09:19, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Player Score
>>> -
>>> comex 19
>>> Pavitra82
>>
>> ais523, Pavitra, and comex each got 20 points for w
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 19:15 -0800, Taral wrote:
> Scorekeepor's Scoreboard
>
> Player Score
> -
>
> All other players have a score of 0.
> I contest the accuracy of this report (to prevent any self-ratifications).
I'm pretty sure I have at least one point from Werewolves; I've
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Player Score
>> -
>> comex 19
>> Pavitra82
>
> ais523, Pavitra, and comex each got 20 points for winning Werewolves.
>
> And since I'm not going to catch Pavitra, this is a
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:10 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my ugly (un-)wrapping script if you want it:
> http://agora.qoid.us/aword.py
Can you repackage that as a greasemonkey script that will do the
formatting within Gmail?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Googling wrap text doesn't help..
Here's my ugly (un-)wrapping script if you want it:
http://agora.qoid.us/aword.py
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:35 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, titled "Inactives lose MwP", AI=1 II=1
>> {
>> In Rule 1922, replace
>> {
>> (e) Minister Without Portfolio, to be awarded by t
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, titled "Inactives lose MwP", AI=1 II=1
> {
> In Rule 1922, replace
> {
> (e) Minister Without Portfolio, to be awarded by the Herald to
> any player who wins the game and does not alrea
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> player wasn't inactive, until there the number of persons bearing this
I think you meant to remove the "there" there; as written it doesn't make sense.
Fixing an ambiguity: The "external attribute" may be from either B or Agora,
unless all interested players are in one nomic, in which case I may limit it
to that nomic for ease of play.
--
Charles Schaefer
Summary for Agoran Players who don't play B: MathNauts was a subgame which B
Nomic repealed before anyone got a chance to play it, so some B citizens
have decided to have an "unofficial" (not connected to B/Agora) game. You're
all invited to join us!
MathNauts will be played on the spoon-calvinbal
The wiki shows the state of things as of the Notary's monthly report in
early October. I'll update these events to it tomorrow.
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Pledge #52 terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 I'm Just FINE terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Happiness in Slavery terminated by ais5
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Pledge #52 terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 I'm Just FINE terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:01:14 Happiness in Slavery terminated by ais523
Fri 3 Oct 16:12:06 Pledge #53 is noted as having self-terminated
Fri 3 Oct 16:32:38 Pledge #19 terminated by root
Sat 4 Oc
66 matches
Mail list logo
