Roger Hicks wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:25, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Caller's arguments: If the awards are treated as three ordered >> actions, then ais523 and Pavitra got 20 points each (VALID but >> ILLEGAL, they should have only gotten 18 each) and comex got >> nothing (INVALID). If they are treated as three unordered actions, >> then the whole thing fails due to ambiguity; if they are treated as >> one single action, then the whole thing also fails. >> > in case #1 comex would have got 5 points since the Werewolves point > limit is 45 (don't forget as Contestmaster you are an active > first-class party).
That depends on whether comex's award counts as a single "award 20", or as 20 x "award 1". If the latter, then e got 15 points (or 5 if the active-parties-only amendment has taken effect).
