On Saturday 27 September 2008 06:20:41 pm comex wrote:
> We have no Rule
> 400
>0, so I think we're safe.
Interesting. I read "4E83" to mean 0x4E83, which would be R20099. So
we're safe either way.
Pavitra
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "not necessarily true" doesn't imply automatically false, does it?
I believe precedent is that if a disclaimer implies that something may
not actually be true, it's not an announcement.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:56 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disclaimer: The remainder of this message is not necessarily true.
>
> I CFJ on the following statement: This CFJ will exist one second from now.
>
> Disclaimer: The above disclaimer is not necessarily true. This
> disclaimer take
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which server/channel is this, again?
Freenode, ##nomic.
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Get on IRC!
Which server/channel is this, again?
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On another note, I really don't have time to keep up with the AAA
> right now. Isn't there someone (anyone?) who would be willing to take
> it over for now?
FRC is less work. Want to trade contests?
-root
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Get on IRC!
tusho wrote:
> On 28/09/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal:
>>
>> Proposal: switch off the fountain (AI=3)
> How dare you!
Do you smell paint?
(OscarMeyr to Kelly, IIRC: "It was created via a scam, it should only
be repealed via a scam.")
On 28/09/2008, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Proposal: switch off the fountain (AI=3)
How dare you!
> {
> WHEREAS the Town Fountain is an ugly triviality of ASCII art, unlike
> the fine Map of Agora,
>
> and whereas the scamming spirit of the game is adequa
ais523 wrote:
> Ah, this might be where it breaks down in Agora. The point is that as I
> haven't reached my CFJ limit yet, there's no way that the attempt to
> call a CFJ can fail, except for some other part of the transaction
> failing.
And in fact it does fail because of how it's disclaimered.
ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 00:45 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal: Community service
>> (AI = 1.7, please)
>>
>> woggle is a co-author of this proposal.
>>
>> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by appending this text between the
>> sections on FINE and CHOKEY:
>>
>> * COMMUNITY
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2008 04:37:45 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Overall I think it's up to the officer (or contestmaster) recording
>> the transactions to decide if it's straightforward and if it is,
>> assume the conditional
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:48 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone with internet access has the power to send email from any address at
>> all.
> >From any From: address, yes. The path from server to server can give it
> away though, in theory, unless the attacker happens to control a se
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 17:45 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can testify that ais523 has access to [EMAIL PROTECTED] currently,
> > though comex and I both have the power to send email from that address
> > as well, and three of
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:13 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can testify that ais523 has access to [EMAIL PROTECTED] currently,
> though comex and I both have the power to send email from that address
> as well, and three of asiekierka, Norgg, Pavitra and Sgeo could
> conspire to do so.
A
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 16:37 -0500, Pikhq wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 15:38:07 ais523 wrote:
> > I act on behalf of the Monster to deputise for the Speaker to assign
> > prerogatives for October 2008 as follows:
> >
> > BobTHJ Wielder of Extra Votes
> > ais523 Default Officeholder
> > Z
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 17:13 -0400, ihope wrote:
>> I can testify that ais523 has access to [EMAIL PROTECTED] currently,
>> though comex and I both have the power to send email from that address
>> as well, and three of asiekierka,
NttPF
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Dvorak Herring
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote:
>>
>> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
>> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
>
> AGAINST
>>
>> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
>
> AGAINST
>>
>> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 17:13 -0400, ihope wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 27 Sep 2008, at 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> This message hereby informs the Agoran community that this email address
> >> is one that I will occasionally use
I vote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
AGAINST
> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
AGAINST
> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic rights and privileges
AGAINST
> 5711 O 1 1.7 Murphy Community service
AGAINST
> 571
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:00 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Prove that it's you.
>>
>> Since when do we require that for a simple email address change?
>>
> Since Phill was revealed, probably. Also, it's not exactly a change;
> this is still my main address, but I may post through the o
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 14:58 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 27 Sep 2008, at 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> This message hereby informs the Agoran community that this email address
> >> is one that I will occasiona
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2008, at 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> This message hereby informs the Agoran community that this email address
>> is one that I will occasionally use to send messages to Agora, and
>> messages
>> from this
On 27 Sep 2008, at 20:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message hereby informs the Agoran community that this email
address
is one that I will occasionally use to send messages to Agora, and
messages
from this address are likely to be from me. However, I will
continue to use
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thursday 25 September 2008 04:37:45 pm Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Overall I think it's up to the officer (or contestmaster) recording
> the transactions to decide if it's straightforward and if it is,
> assume the conditional works as intended and if it's not
> straightforward, the officer should reje
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:34 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 17:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I'm not recording this as a win unless it's shown that "certain powers"
>> in the generic sense that a foreign nomic might grant them is the same
>> as power in the specifi
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 13:25 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 01:22:24 pm ihope wrote:
> > With the consent of all its parties, I intend to amend The Normish
> > Partnership by adding the following item to the end of its ordered
> > list: "6. Normish Point Vouchers are a curr
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 12:30 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 01:07:26 am Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Proposal: Judicial Declarations
> > A judicial declaration published by a judge as required by
> > the rules in conjunction with a judgement is self-ratifying,
> >
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:47 -0400, ihope wrote:
> With the consent of all its parties, I intend to amend The Normish
> Partnership by adding the following item to the end of its ordered
> list: "6. Normish Point Vouchers are a currency whose recordkeepor is
> The Normish Partnership. Any party to T
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 17:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > Rule 2148/2 reads, in part, "A foreign nomic may grant certain powers
> > and privileges to Agora's ambassador." "Power" is defined by R1688/4
> > to be a non-negative rational number which, if positi
On Saturday 27 September 2008 11:04:50 am ais523 wrote:
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal my own judgement of CFJ 2166,
> suggesting REMAND; that way I can judge all 3 CFJs together as an
> effectively linked assignment, rather than having to try to
> synchronise all the individual CFJs one app
On Saturday 27 September 2008 01:07:26 am Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Judicial Declarations
> A judicial declaration published by a judge as required by
> the rules in conjunction with a judgement is self-ratifying,
> provided that that judgement remains in effect. Such a
>
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 16:47 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > I perform all the actions in the following block of text, if and only if
> > they would all be successful, and every non-action statement in that
> > block of text would be true at the time it was made:
> > {{{
> > I call fo
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 00:45 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Community service
> (AI = 1.7, please)
>
> woggle is a co-author of this proposal.
>
> Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by appending this text between the
> sections on FINE and CHOKEY:
>
> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a set of u
On 27 Sep 2008, at 17:45, ais523 wrote:
I submit the following proposal (AI=1, II=1, Title="The IADoP is
always
right"):
Append the following paragraph to rule 2138:
{{{
The portion of a public message purporting to be an IADoP's report
that
lists the holder of each office is self-rati
35 matches
Mail list logo
