On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 12:30 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 01:07:26 am Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Proposal:  Judicial Declarations
> >       A judicial declaration published by a judge as required by
> >       the rules in conjunction with a judgement is self-ratifying,
> >       provided that that judgement remains in effect.  Such a
> >       judgement may be inappropriate due to the content of this
> >       declaration, rules to the contrary notwithstanding.
> 
> This sounds very easily abusable, considering the recent tradition of 
> judicial corruption. If this passes, I think my Favor might turn out 
> to have been a *very* good investment.
> 
"Self-ratifying" is easily stopped with a simple objection.
-- 
ais523

Reply via email to