On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:56 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disclaimer: The remainder of this message is not necessarily true.
>
> I CFJ on the following statement: This CFJ will exist one second from now.
>
> Disclaimer: The above disclaimer is not necessarily true. This
> disclaimer takes precedence over the above disclaimer.
>
> I argue for FALSE, as it would be useful for earlier parts of a
> message to always take precedence over later parts, especially for
> things like Normish, where we might want to have a disclaimer followed
> by arbitrary text submitted by an untrusted user.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
"not necessarily true" doesn't imply automatically false, does it?
