ttention on the disks with zero space left. But these were
working fine.
Once I declared the "thin provisioned" disks as read-only in "update stgpooldir
XXX access=readonly" on TSM everything works fine.
I will remove them ASAP.
Conclusion:
1. TSM works fine, but c
: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCR backups fail ! TSM 8.1.17 Windows Server and client
Hi David,
Just make sure that containers are excluded from anti-virus scan.
On Sunday, August 20, 2023, David L.A. De Leeuw wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apparently, this has nothing to do with
;
> I have no idea why this should happen, but we will find it.
> Thanks for your support !
>
> David
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: דוד דה ליאו
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 9:37 PM
> To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] INCR backups
M: Dist Stor Manager
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] INCR backups fail ! TSM 8.1.17 Windows Server and client
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot.
The SP Server is not on VM, just the storage. I am not the manager to the
server.
Just got a lot of backup storage if we provide the space for the containers.
Sure we run
Of Michael Prix
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 9:04 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCR backups fail ! TSM 8.1.17 Windows Server and client
Hello David,
an *SP-Server in a VM is not the best setup, but nevertheless it should work
- and has proven so for the past.
For the
46]:53184) on
> STOREWARE13.auth.ad.bgu.ac.il:1502. (SESSION: 197902)
> 20-08-2023 19:47:26 ANR8592I Session 197903 connection is using protocol
> TLSV13, cipher specification TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,
> certificate TSM Self-Signed Certificate. (SESSION:
> 197903)
> 20-08-2023 19:47:26
nection is using protocol
TLSV13, cipher specification TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384,
certificate TSM Self-Signed Certificate. (SESSION:
197903)
20-08-2023 19:47:26 ANR0839I Session 197903 started for node MEDFS2 (WinNT)
Just to make sure that we are on the same page...
You have TSM installed on VM running on VMware. This VM has few LUNs
presented and those LUN are used for containers?
Short in the dark:
1. Check VM resources if they are as IBM TSM blue print.
2. Check LUNs/HDDs response time in perf. monitor
trum Protect server.
> Our system manager is on holidays this week, so cannot check that further.
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Chavdar
> Cholev
> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 11:16 AM
> To: ADSM-L
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] INCR backups fail ! TSM 8.1.17 Windows Server and client
Hi David,
What kind of storage do you use for containers (SAN, NAS...)?
On Saturday, August 19, 2023, David L.A. De Leeuw wrote:
> Hi TSM experts,
>
> Our incr backup fails consistently in the last few days.
Hi David,
What kind of storage do you use for containers (SAN, NAS...)?
On Saturday, August 19, 2023, David L.A. De Leeuw wrote:
> Hi TSM experts,
>
> Our incr backup fails consistently in the last few days. It starts alright
> but after a few gigabyte on the client we g
Hi TSM experts,
Our incr backup fails consistently in the last few days. It starts alright but
after a few gigabyte on the client we get the error:
ANS1301E This operation cannot continue due to an error on the IBM Spectrum
Protect server. See your IBM Spectrum Protect server administrator
Ah, OK, I was thinking in relation to tape devices, I wouldn't expect SAN
discovery to be in play for disk, or at least not in a way that's visible
to TSM.
Definitely let the list know what the results of the PMR are, I suspect
many of us will be curious...
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at
Hi Skylar
We use disk for db backup and it will finish within 30 minutes once db
backup started at db2 level for 2 tb database.
There is no errors or warnings reported during db backup and only concern
it takes more than 30 min to see db backup message in db2diag log though
tsm side backup db
.edu 206.221.5000, for assistance.
> |---!
>
> V8.1.18
>
> We have noticed tsm backup started at tsm level but didn???t issue any
> message to db2 and tsm level db backup appears hung
>
> db2 list utilities show details - No process
> db2diag.log -
Hi Vikas
We are using latest tsm client (8.1.17.2) and server version (8.1.18)
Regards
Sarav
+65 9857 8665
> On 30 May 2023, at 2:27 AM, Vikas Arora wrote:
>
> Hi Sarav,
>
> May I ask which tsm client version (dsmadmc) you are using? Can you please
> try to update
Hi Sarav,
May I ask which tsm client version (dsmadmc) you are using? Can you please
try to update it with the latest version and then re-try? I had a similar
experience a few days ago and that helped!
thanks
Grüße
Vikas Arora
*e Mail* : vikar...@gmail.com
On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 13:38
---
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Saravanan
> Palanisamy
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 12:17 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM db backup delayed or hung for more than few hours
>
> V8.1.18
>
> We have noticed tsm backup started at tsm
Monday, May 29, 2023 12:17 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM db backup delayed or hung for more than few hours
V8.1.18
We have noticed tsm backup started at tsm level but didn’t issue any message
to db2 and tsm level db backup appears hung
db2 list utilities show details - No
V8.1.18
We have noticed tsm backup started at tsm level but didn’t issue any message
to db2 and tsm level db backup appears hung
db2 list utilities show details - No process
db2diag.log - didn’t see any message like ( Starting an online db backup )
Tried to restart tsm server to clear db2
ager On Behalf Of Bent
Christensen (BVC)
Sent: Tuesday, 24 January, 2023 09:32
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Restoring virus infected file halts TSM client
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your response and suggestion.
I have been using the weekend to dig a little deeper into the is
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your response and suggestion.
I have been using the weekend to dig a little deeper into the issue, and it
turns out that if I just restore the folder containing the infected file, TSM
restores all other files and just responds with a:
01/19/2023 15:58:57 ANSE
> the AV application at the time when the malicious file was written.
>
> When the TSM client tries to restore an infected file back to a Windows
> server, the AV application on the Windows server will of course prevent the
> file from being written. However, the TSM client interpret
Storage
stor...@us.ibm.com
IBM
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of Bent
Christensen (BVC)
Sent: Thursday, 19 January, 2023 06:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Restoring virus infected file halts TSM client
Hello,
Just wondered if anyone have had the
was not detected by the AV
application at the time when the malicious file was written.
When the TSM client tries to restore an infected file back to a Windows server,
the AV application on the Windows server will of course prevent the file from
being written. However, the TSM client interprets
MARIST.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2.3 data migration
Good Morning,
Had an issue with TSM a few weeks ago and did a DB restore. I had to drop the
TSM DB before I could do the restore and now that the restore was done migrate
and reclamations do not run.
I have had several looking but
ystem designed to be
100% bug-for-bug compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux®. It is under
intensive development by the community.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 8:53 AM Michaud, Luc [Analyste principal -
environnement AIX] wrote:
Hello Maurizio !
Our shop is very happy with the migration from AIX t
wrote:
Hello Maurizio !
Our shop is very happy with the migration from AIX to RHEL 8.5 (on
bare-metal x86 servers) for our TSM 8.1.12 ...
Costs a bit of money, but quite a bit less than TSM !
Coming from AIX, I expected Red Hat to be lesser value with regards to
"how-to" support. Amazin
] wrote:
Hello Maurizio !
Our shop is very happy with the migration from AIX to RHEL 8.5 (on bare-metal
x86 servers) for our TSM 8.1.12 ...
Costs a bit of money, but quite a bit less than TSM !
Coming from AIX, I expected Red Hat to be lesser value with regards to "how-to"
support.
at 8:53 AM Michaud, Luc [Analyste principal -
environnement AIX] wrote:
> Hello Maurizio !
>
> Our shop is very happy with the migration from AIX to RHEL 8.5 (on
> bare-metal x86 servers) for our TSM 8.1.12 ...
>
> Costs a bit of money, but quite a bit less than TSM !
>
Hello,
hope you still enjoy this good backup tool :) .
Has anyone try other "unsupported" Linux distribution with TSM 8.1 (more
for test environments) than CentOS?
I had my system working on CentOS 8 but it's was EOL on last 31 Dec and
it's time now to move on.
I try sev
Hi guys,
we have developed a TSM / SP healthcheck report which compares your
environment with the IBM Best Practices and IBM Blueprint recommendations.
The generated report is HTML based, full of useful graphs, vital
information and can be viewed offline.
The only thing you need to do is run our
Hello Guys/Girls
I'm faced to a windows 10 PC Crash and I have bought a new hardware.
I was try to dump the registry part (do be able to extract some parts
with regedit) from the latest backup but the client v7 (or v8) not
display anymore the selection to restore it on a specific folder.
A
04/28/2021
03:48:51 AM:
> From: Saravanan Palanisamy
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 04/28/2021 03:49 AM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [E] Re: [ADSM-L] TSM alternatives
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Hi Del
>
> I could see oracle SPARC support API v
ot Solaris x86_64.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Del
>
>
>
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/26/2021
> 06:25:34 AM:
>
>> From: "Stahlberg, Michael"
>> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARI
of this year with full support... and longer with extended
> support.
> - You can also mount the Solaris SPARC filesystems and back it up from a
> proxy server.
>
>
> Del
>
>
>
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/23/2021
> 09:32:19 AM:
>
> &g
> From: "Stahlberg, Michael"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 04/26/2021 06:26 AM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [E] Re: [ADSM-L] TSM alternatives
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Hi Del,
>
> We use Solaris Sparc, and it was clear for me that this
This could also work - www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpapers/pdfs/redp3980.pdf
- Mark
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/23/2021
01:47:39 PM:
> From: Del Hoobler
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 04/23/2021 01:48 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ADSM-L] TSM API for Cassan
Hi Del,
Thanks for your response.
The "dump and sweep" method may not good solution here as taking Backup and
dumping onto local/remote filesystem may take some time and then taking that
flat file Backup onto TSM using BA client would more time & resource consuming
process a
Hello Team,
Does anyone taking Cassandra database Backup using TSM API ?
I have a request to perform a Backup for Cassandra database , But could not
able to find any TDP agent for the same..!
Does it possible to Backup Cassandra database Backup using a customize API and
perform an online
-using-s3-client-applications
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/23/2021
03:26:11 PM:
> From: "Bommasani, Venu"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 04/23/2021 03:26 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSM API
There is no "TDP for Cassandra".
Some ideas to consider:
1. Leverage the new "S3" interface to the Spectrum Protect server (instead
of the TSM API).
2. Use the "dump and sweep" method, i.e. dump the backup to a file and
then back up the file with th
HI all,
unfortunately IBM decided to stop the support for Solaris Clients. This is
a pain for us and we have decided to move to a different product. I'm
checking for alternatives and would like to know if somebody has the same
issue and/or has already decided to move to a different product. I'm no
ot;Stahlberg, Michael"
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 04/23/2021 09:33 AM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] TSM alternatives
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> HI all,
>
> unfortunately IBM decided to stop the support for Solaris Clients. This
is
>
Not recommend as it uses different versions of the same components (baclient,
etc.), and updating TSMVE may break the TSM server itself. In my case, DBBackup
were broken after VE update due version mismatch.
It is much safer to run VE in a separate virtual machine. Or physical, because
you
t;ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2021-03-09
02:30:47:
> From: Mikhail Tolkonyuk
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 2021-03-09 02:31
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSM for VE installation on TSM server
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
> Not recommend as
Hi everyone,
I have no idea if anyone here has ever tried running TSM for VE on the TSM
server. To make it short, I was asked by a customer to move their vBackup
Storage that is now running on a separate physical server than TSM Server
(physical). I have tried to look at documentation but failed
length TSM.OPT files in the BACLIENT folder and
the TDPSQL folder. I have another server that filled up the C: drive for a
reason other than TSM logs and the same zero length DSM.OPT was created.
IBM should create the new DSM.OPT file with a different name, and if that
is successful, then delete
Paul,
TSM 6.3 was a challenging time for TSM reporting. Most likely TSM Operational
Reporting v5.5 was used.
Version 6.3 had the Tivoli Monitoring component but was not well received by
most admins.
Instead there was a documented process to modify the TSM Operational reporting
from version 5.5
We have a legacy TSM backup system - TSM v6.3. I need to change the SMTP server
it uses to send emails such as the TSM Admin daily operational report. How do I
do this?
Regards
Paul Dudley
pdud...@anl.com.au<mailto:pdud...@anl.com.au>
Hi Stefan,
At the time the servers were installed Redhat 6.4 was our standard. The servers
need to be upgraded to the latest 6.x release first before we can upgrade TSM
to 8.1.x. But before making any changes to the environment while we have a case
open at IBM, I need to be sure there is a
May I ask, is there a specific reason you are running fairly old server
code in the environment?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:01 PM Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM <
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> There is no noticable impact on the TSM performance when we use the
>
Hi Stefan,
There is no noticable impact on the TSM performance when we use the tsmdiskperf
tool on the database volumes.
We recently discovered the issue seems to be related to the TDP for Oracle
clients. When none are running the server response is OK, even during a
reasonable load. But as
please notify the
> sender by e-mail, telephone or fax at the numbers listed above. Thank you.
>
>
> www.panalpina.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Loon, Eric van
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Hi Arnoud,
I do not understand why your max seg size (kbytes) = 18014398509465599 and max
total shared memory (kbytes) = 18014397435740096 are so huge. If you have 256
GB RAM, like I do
for your help!
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage & Backup
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of PAC
Brion Arnaud
Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2019 09:02
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server perform
, 2019 1:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Arnaud,
Apologies for off topic question but what series nodes are you using in the
Isilon?
Thank you,
-Rick Adamson
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of PAC Brion
Arnaud
] TSM server performance continuing
* This email originated outside of the organization. Use caution when opening
attachments or clicking links. *
--
Hi Eric,
Running 4 TSM servers at 8.1.6.1 (PowerLinux servers with 256 GB RAM
Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of J.
Eric Wonderley
Sent: woensdag 21 augustus 2019 18:18
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TSM server performance continuing
Get all zeros...
We have these settings on a dell730:
ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system
Hi Eric,
Running 4 TSM servers at 8.1.6.1 (PowerLinux servers with 256 GB RAM), and
making use of directory-container storage pools only.
No server performance or responsiveness issues here anymore, since we changed
our storage to make use of IBM Isilon.
Here my values :
vmstat 1
procs
Hi - FYI.
Got 3 TSM v8.1.1.0 servers. Srry, no directory containers.
Two are mostly idle ATM, and vmstat 1 B column shows all zeroes on these.
But, the 3rd which is the primary backup server is currently serving
main backup window with 4 data migration to tape processes active ATM so
it is
2019 10:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM server performance continuing
CAUTION: ***EXTERNAL EMAIL*** Do NOT click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you are unsure, please
use PhishAlarm to report suspicious emails.
Hi
AM Loon, Eric van (ITOP NS) - KLM <
eric-van.l...@klm.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> A few weeks ago I already wrote about the severe performance issues we
> have with our TSM 7.1 servers. In the 'old days' we used to back up our
> clients to TSM 6.3 servers with Data Do
Hi guys,
A few weeks ago I already wrote about the severe performance issues we have
with our TSM 7.1 servers. In the 'old days' we used to back up our clients to
TSM 6.3 servers with Data Domains attached. Smaller clients backed up through
the LAN, large ones through the SAN.
Hi guys,
I'm wondering if more people are running TSM in a cluster configuration. We
always used Linux clusters based on Veritas Cluster Service (VCS). Ever since
we were switched to IBM hardware we also had to switch to a different multipath
driver and that is where the problems starte
I have a 11 TB TSM server backing up data in container pools with 50+ TB
daily ingest.
On Wed 3 Apr, 2019, 4:44 PM Dwight Cook, wrote:
> So who all out there has TSM servers with DB's in the 3+ TB range that
> ingest 50+-ish TB's per night into a container storage pool?
> D
So who all out there has TSM servers with DB's in the 3+ TB range that
ingest 50+-ish TB's per night into a container storage pool?
Doesn't matter if it is 7.1 or 8.1 or AIX or Linux
I'm seeing behavior that I would classify as ~odd~ and wondering if others
might be t
rnel parameters for your Linux TSM server?
>> yes, here is my /etc/sysctl.conf>
>> kernel.randomize_va_space=0
>> vm.swappiness=0
>> vm.overcommit_memory=0
>>
> My ipcs is somewhat different, and I doubt it has anything to do with
> your problem - here it is:
&
On 6.12.2018. 6:20, Schneck Dennis wrote:
> Hello Sasa,
>
>> did you tune kernel parameters for your Linux TSM server?
>
> yes, here is my /etc/sysctl.conf>
> kernel.randomize_va_space=0
> vm.swappiness=0
> vm.overcommit_memory=0
>
My ipcs is somewhat differen
Hello Sasa,
>did you tune kernel parameters for your Linux TSM server?
yes, here is my /etc/sysctl.conf
kernel.randomize_va_space=0
vm.swappiness=0
vm.overcommit_memory=0
tsm01:~ # ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system wide = 64512
max size of message (bytes) = 65
On 2018-12-05 15:06, Schneck Dennis wrote:
> Hello Sasa
>
>> Check for errors on FC switch ports...
>
> Ok will inform the colleage in the branch
>
>
>> When have the problems started?
>
> Its a new server - did not work before
Hi Dennis,
did you tune
roblems started?
>
> --
> Sasa Drnjevic
> www.srce.unizg.hr
>
>
>
>
> On 5.12.2018. 14:15, Schneck Dennis wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> starting with new TSM-Server 7.1.9.000 on a SLES12SP3 x86_64 with LIN_TAPE
>> 3.033
>>
>> TAPE.Lib is a TS3310
Check for errors on FC switch ports...
When have the problems started?
--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr
On 5.12.2018. 14:15, Schneck Dennis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> starting with new TSM-Server 7.1.9.000 on a SLES12SP3 x86_64 with LIN_TAPE
> 3.033
>
> TAPE.Lib is a TS331
Hello,
starting with new TSM-Server 7.1.9.000 on a SLES12SP3 x86_64 with LIN_TAPE 3.033
TAPE.Lib is a TS3310 with LTO5 Drives.
Server has: Emulex AJ762B/AH402A FC Adapter an the run both with: 4 Gbit
(lspci | grep -i fibre)
tsm: TSM01>*SET DBRECOVERY 3310L1DEV PROTECTKeys=no*
ANR27
On 2018-11-01 18:19, Michaud, Luc [Analyste principal - environnement
AIX] wrote:
> We want to upgrade our AIX-based TSM servers from 7.1.7.000 to
> 8.1.x.yyy
>
> The official IBM server upgrade process does not worry us by itself.
>
> However, on this list, over the last
We want to upgrade our AIX-based TSM servers from 7.1.7.000 to 8.1.x.yyy
The official IBM server upgrade process does not worry us by itself.
However, on this list, over the last year, I did notice issues with
SESSIONSECURITY, Web Client, as well as some regressions.
So, here are my questions
rds,
Andy
Andrew Raibeck | IBM Spectrum Protect Level 3 | stor...@us.ibm.com
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 2018-10-31
13:21:43:
> From: Thomas Denier
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 2018-10-31 13:22
> Subject: Removing TSM for Databases
>
We have a 64 bit x86 Linux server on which TSM for Databases (for Oracle) 7.1
was installed but never used. We would like to remove this TSM component. I
have so far been completely unsuccessful in finding instructions for doing
this. Where is the uninstall procedure documented?
Thomas Denier
onest, I've configured once a TS4300 whith TSM 7.1.7 on Windows 2012R2
and it worked. The gap between the guy who sells and the other one who does the
job... I don't know with AIX, but it should be the same.
PS : Please say hello to David G. and Olivier S. for me.
--
Best regards / Co
We looking into replacing our old IBM TS3310 FC LTO4 library with a DELL/EMC
ML3 (OEM of IBM TS4300) with FC LTO-7 drives.
We are at TSM 7.1.7 on AIX 7.1.
Do we need to upgrade TSM to at least v8.1.2 or are we ok with TSM 7.1.7 ?
Luc
Spectrum Protect server.
You can find the same concept also at
https://www.lascon.co.uk/tsm-backups.php#bsnetapp, where you'll find:
The second snapshot is called the diffsnapshot. TSM then incrementally backs up
the files reported as changed by NetApp to the TSM server.
I am pretty sure
Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di Efim
> Inviato: mercoledì 19 settembre 2018 18:39
> A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Oggetto: Re: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
> machine, making use of NFS mounts
>
> Arnaud,
>
> Can you explain
18:39
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: Re: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
machine, making use of NFS mounts
Arnaud,
Can you explain why you are copying the .snapshot folder during incremental
filesystem backup with snapdiff?
It contains snapshots created by netapp
Hi Efim and All who helped
Quick update on this : it appeared that some export policy rule (i.e."
-superuser sys" ) had not been properly set on our Netapp, thus refraining TSM
client to reach some files. Once this corrected, I was able to get successful
snapshot backups don
ion Arnaud
> написал(а):
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks a lot for appreciated feedback, unfortunately even when using TSM own
> snapshots the problem still exists :
>
> root@xx:~ # dsmc i /Airwarder -snapdiff -diffsnapshot=create
> -snapdiffhttps -optfile=$OPTPAT
Hi Robert,
Thanks a lot for appreciated feedback, unfortunately even when using TSM own
snapshots the problem still exists :
root@xx:~ # dsmc i /Airwarder -snapdiff -diffsnapshot=create -snapdiffhttps
-optfile=$OPTPATH >/tmp/snapshot_Airwarder.log
root@ xx:~ # more /
rnaud
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Del
Hoobler
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:16 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine,
making use of NFS mounts
Hi A
Brion:
Here at Cornell, we have a TSM client on a Linux system backing up NFS shares
via NFS mounts and snapdiff differentials - and have been doing so for years.
First, the gory details:
- For TSM
TSM Client Version 7, Release 1, Level 6.0 (*red faced, thought I had upgraded
to SP 8.1.2.0
t; wrote on 09/18/2018
07:57:56 AM:
> From: PAC Brion Arnaud
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 09/18/2018 07:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
> machine, making use of NFS mounts
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
Bollini
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 12:29 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: R: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
machine, making use of NFS mounts
Hello Arnaud, maybe it would be: The NetApp snapshot indicates which files are
modified on the LUN (for which
PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machine,
making use of NFS mounts
Hi Arnaud,
Not related to SnapDiff ... but just some info on NDMP and B/A Client...
In Spectrum Protect BA client 8.1.6 that GAs this coming Friday (21
September) you wi
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 09/18/2018
06:20:52 AM:
> From: PAC Brion Arnaud
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 09/18/2018 06:21 AM
> Subject: Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux
> machine, making use of NFS mounts
> Sent by: "
e rules in incl.excl file to
skip them.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Per conto di PAC
Brion Arnaud
Inviato: martedì 18 settembre 2018 12:21
A: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Oggetto: [ADSM-L] Netapp snapdiff issues having TSM client on a Linux machin
n defining necessary user and roles on the Netapp, as well
as to setup the TSM client in order to interact with our filer, but I'm now
facing an issue where some files cannot be backed up, apparently due to access
rights.
Here an extract of our backup log :
IBM Spectrum Protect
Command Line
Hi Guys,
We recently upgraded one of tsm server to tsm v815 with interest to get
best of tape enhancement support announced in v815. But while running
normal operations like migration (disk to tape) or so, we doubt that it
still has poor performance. How could we be sure that these enhancements
Hi Eric and list.
I found the problem.
The home directory of the user is /tsm/wtsmt01. That is also the mount point
of a file system
When mounted the permissions were fine
drwxrwxrwx 11 wtsmt01 tsm 16384 25 May 16:55 wtsmt01
When unmounted however the permissions were not
: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Loon,
Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2018 10:27 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Instance can't find its instance directory.
Hi Steve,
Did you check the content of the .profile file of the ins
Hi Steve,
Did you check the content of the .profile file of the instance user on the DR
host? It should be identical to the one on the prime site.
If that's OK you could try and drop the instance and recatalog the database on
the DR node:
# /opt/tivoli/tsm/db2/instance/db2idrop
# /opt/t
just shot in the dsrk
did check user thst run tsm and its permissioms
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Harris, Steven <
steven.har...@btfinancialgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a curly one here. TSM 7.1.1.300 on AIX 7.1
>
> I'm preparing for a DR test.
>
>
Hi guys
I have a curly one here. TSM 7.1.1.300 on AIX 7.1
I'm preparing for a DR test.
The DR process is that the TSM instance directory, database, logs and disk/file
storage pools reside on an IBM V840 flash device. These are mirrored to the DR
site using remote copy. The old way w
1 - 100 of 21190 matches
Mail list logo
