Re: ANS1809W incremental backups fail

2007-10-31 Thread Jolliff, Dale
We are having the same issue -- there seems to be some issue with the TCP offload engine in MS service Pack 2. I have PMR 75625 open on it and I hear that there are several more in level 2 collecting traces. We don't have a resolution yet. I'm running 5.4 client on one of these and I'm going to

Re: SharePointServer

2004-05-10 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Does this allow document level backup/restore? Dale Jolliff Data Administration Team Backup and Recovery Office: (214)567-5116 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Boyer Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 7:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

Re: TSM DB growing, but number of files remains the same ...

2004-05-04 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Speaking of the accounting log, what version and patch level actually came out with corrections for problems that were introduced in the 4.x versions? I don't even remember now what version it was that broke. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B

Anyone using Solaris 9 and 4.2 client?

2004-04-06 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Is this something related to Solaris 9, or does the filesystem just need a fsck? This is with a 4.2 client. 04/01/04 19:52:14 PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=164 from fioGetDirEntries: /export /lost+found 04/01/04 19:52:20 ANS4023E Error processing '/export': file input/output error 04/01/

64 bit Oracle issue resolved; audit volume issues

2004-03-25 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Thanks to all who responded and reminded me about the location of the dsm.sys file for the 64bit Oracle agent. I just couldn't remember. Senility is... um, ... rough. On another unrelated issue, I had the infamous ANR2209W on a copy pool volume - I audited it and got this message back - I don't

TDPO for Oracle

2004-03-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I see this question has been asked several times in the list, but I fail to see any answers on ADSM.ORG. I'm getting the "ANS0263E Either the dsm.sys file was not found, or the Inclexcl file specified in the dsm.sys was not found" error when trying to set the password after installing the 64 bit

Re: Copy Pool expiration conundrum

2004-03-10 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Or, just do it the old way - once your copies are synced in the new copy pool, start deleting volumes in the old pool. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: TSM 4.1 Transaction Max Log Size?

2004-02-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Um, I think 4.1 was still 4GB. 13 GB was at 4.2 wasn't it? Dale Jolliff Data Administration Team Backup and Recovery Office: (214)567-5116 Cell: (972)896-8851 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Bantz Sent: Friday, February 20, 2

Will Solaris 8 -> Mainframe restore db work?

2004-02-11 Thread Jolliff, Dale
We have had an issue arise and we need to know if it is possible to restore a TSM database backup that was taken on a Solaris 8 system onto a mainframe environment. Anyone ever tried that? Dale Jolliff Data Administration Team Backup and Recovery

5.2 upgrade path

2004-01-19 Thread Jolliff, Dale
We are looking at an upgrade from 4.2.1.15 to some version that supports LTO Gen 2 drives, which I hear is 5.2 or later... I have the 5.0 media. Are all the versions between 5.0 and 5.2.x downloadable, or is there another step that requires a media set? What is the oldest/most stable version tha

4.2 Server README file

2004-01-15 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I'm trying to locate the 4.2.1.15 README file from the TSM server package. I need to find the latest supported version of IBMTape for Solaris at that revision of TSM Server. Support tells me they can't give me that information. If anyone has it or knows it, I would really appreciate it. Thanks!

Re: Collocation Vs Multiple Storage Pools

2003-10-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
DRP quickly comes to mind. "move nodedata" with a preview may overcome that, but when doing DRP based on levels of service provided to the customer, being able to decide we only need 15 of the 3-5,000 offsite tapes trucked across the country is ... essential. We jump through several hoops to deter

Anyone using ACSLS/L5500/LTO gen 2 drives?

2003-10-09 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone using LTO Gen 2 in an STK L5500 with ACSLS? If you are what versions of TSM and ACSLS are you using? Are you sharing the library with anything else? Any big gotchas to be aware of? We have an L5500 dedicated to Veritas NetBackup Datacenter 4.5 fp5 using ACSLS version 6.1.1 with LTO Gen 2 dr

Re: Which nodes on a given tape, what maxscr value to use ?

2003-09-05 Thread Jolliff, Dale
How about just a "q con {volume ID} count=1" That will work on collocated volumes and much quicker than the select. -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which nodes on a given tape,

Re: IBM is not eating their own dog food

2003-08-27 Thread Jolliff, Dale
quot;Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 27.08.2003 07:05 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: IBM is not eating their ow

Re: IBM is not eating their own dog food

2003-08-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Obviously not, they lost the $$$ types with the licensing shuffles and now the techie types with the abysmal support site. -Original Message- From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBM is not eating their

STK and LTO GEN2

2003-08-14 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone else using an STK 5500 silo with LTO gen2 drives?

Re: 5.2 bug?

2003-07-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Must be sun spots today. "Invalid format code" directly from the main page - no results found. "Invalid format code" from the US home page - no results found. 'Invalid format code' from the US home page results in 285,000+ plus hits, starting with Lotus Developer Domain stuff... Or, another lice

AIX

2003-06-12 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone following the SCO fiasco? http://asia.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=291565 9 I have been reading bits and pieces, but haven't heard anything from IBM except the boilerplate response to the lawsuit.

Re: Linux Server Distributions

2003-06-06 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I have been able to install the 5.1.5 server on Redhat 9 (yesterday, hence my post about the missing portions of the install). The part that gets installed seems to work - so far. -Original Message- From: Mitch Sako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:07 PM To: [EM

Re: Linux server dsmserv.idl and webimage files

2003-06-05 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Shark Cell (831) 595-3962 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jolliff, Dale Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linux server dsmserv.idl and webimage files I have the Linux TSM server version 5 install CD

Linux server dsmserv.idl and webimage files

2003-06-05 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I have the Linux TSM server version 5 install CD here, but the packages are incomplete. Is there anyway to get the .IDL file and the webimages directory contents without having to fight through the Tivoli website?

Re: 3494 library and 3590 drive issues

2003-03-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I wasn't so much pointing out the handling of the tape volume, that was as expected; it was the console dying that was really strange. -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3494 library and

3494 library and 3590 drive issues

2003-03-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
This is another new one I have never seen before. I had a console session (dsmadmc -consolemode) and a normal CLI admin session going when this error occurred. The console session terminated on both the client library and the library manager. Just the console, not the admin CLI. I haven't seen th

Re: inaccessible tapes

2003-03-27 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Try checking them out with checklabel=no and checking them in with checklabel=yes. Sounds like TSM may be marking them private because of errors reading/mounting the tapes. -Original Message- From: Wojciech Zukowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EM

Re: Cancel All Processes

2003-03-25 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Million ways to skin a cat, but here's one crude way. dsmadmc -se=$SERVER -id=$ID -pa=$PA -commadelimited "select process_num, process, status from processes" | tail +8 | grep -v ANR | grep -v ANS | grep , > $OUTFILE PROCESSES=`cat $OUTFILE | cut -d, -f1` for PROCESS in

Mount failures in a shared 3494 library

2003-03-24 Thread Jolliff, Dale
TSM Server: 4.2.3.0 (Library manager and client) for Solaris (2.8) 3494 Library with SCSI attached 3590 drives IBMtape 4.0.4.5 At what appears to be random times, we have mount failures where we should be in a media wait state... We see mount failures for scratch also, with essentially the same se

Re: 3466 End of Support

2003-03-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Last I heard (from an unofficial source) was that there were around 200 installations left. Second level support told me at one point that the upgrade to TSM version 5.x would mark the end of 3466 support - at that point, support would simply be broken up into respective hardware, AIX and TSM supp

ADSM.org

2003-03-13 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Is the script download section gone?

Reporter for TSM v 5?

2003-02-27 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone seen the new reporting add-on for TSM version 5?

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers. Just my opinion, but based on the bug releases of late, they are doing a pretty good bagging job on their own.

Re: Stop Bagging TSM Developers.

2003-02-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Just my opinion, but based on the bug releases of late, they are doing a pretty good bagging job on their own.

[no subject]

2003-01-29 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Well, I have successfully exported nodes to tape and disk from an MVS server and imported to a Solaris server, and the other way around - but it's always been to very close version/fix numbers on the servers. Get too far apart, (going backwards at least) and the import complains about downlevel se

4.2.3.2 and .3 Solaris server patches.

2003-01-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I'm sorry, I have had a long day, and I just can't handle the thought of dealing with that support web site again. Anyone have a mirror of the ftp server or a direct link to the server so I can bypass the web site? I thought I saw one in an earlier message, but I couldn't find it searching at the

Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fi x?

2003-01-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
ger Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply) The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence. "Jolliff, Dale&quo

Re: At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fi x?

2003-01-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
have the session count fix? what platform ? when did it break ? I'm at 4.2.2.0 on AIX and I get into the millions on a regular basis...even 10's of millions as I seem to remember. Sess Number --- 1,354,1 76 1,365,0 47 1,369,9 14 Dwight -Original Message

At what level does the 4.2.x server have the session count fix?

2003-01-28 Thread Jolliff, Dale
In 4.2.3.0, after the session count gets to 65K, the session number can no longer be stored in the summary table resulting in an ANRD message. (Can anyone say maxint?) I'm pretty sure a fix is out... I hope.

Re: ANR9999D smnode.c(19810)

2003-01-08 Thread Jolliff, Dale
If this is a Windows node, you might also investigate to see if there is more than one physical machine using the same node name. I'm seeing this where a customer had configured three physical machines (with different versions of windows on each naturally) with the same node name. Lucky for us th

Re: Link to TSM Clients

2003-01-03 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I would be much more impressed if someone spent less time mucking about with a website and more time fixing some of the really plentiful . . . "features" that have cropped up in the last year. -Original Message- From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January

Re: What does this message mean?

2002-12-26 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Still happens here in 4.2.3 I have two servers where it happens, one AIX and the other on Solaris. Creating archives from an older client (3.1 in both cases) triggered the messages. I removed the node and data from the AIX server, and eventually the messages slowed to an occasional occurrence.

Re: What does this message mean?

2002-12-26 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Do you see it during expiration? -Original Message- From: Thach, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 2:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What does this message mean? I started receiving this error message recently for certain nodes after their backup se

Re: SystemObjects

2002-12-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
D] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Fax: (954) 985-1404 ------- -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SystemObjects Well, on my windows nodes the system object is "SYSTEM OB

Re: SystemObjects

2002-12-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
ing the wrong syntax? Thanks, --- Bruce Kamp Midrange Systems Analyst II Memorial Healthcare System E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597 Fax: (954) 985-1404 --- -----Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu

Re: SystemObjects

2002-12-19 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Easy way to tell is to show versions {node name} "SYSTEM OBJECT" and look for excessive amounts of records that have **EXPIRE IMMEDIATELY** (or some such, I don't recall the exact text) in them. -Original Message- From: Frost, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19,

Re: Select statements syntax

2002-12-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
l Gondim van Dongen Engenheiro de Sistemas MCSE Tivoli Certified Consultant - Storage Manager VANguard - Value Added Network guardians http://www.vanguard-it.com.br Fone: 55 81 3225-0353 -Mensagem original- De: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviada em: Wednesday, December 18, 2002

Select statements syntax

2002-12-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I need to create a select statement that concatenates numeric fields as text -- I need to create a single text field from the four numeric fields in the NODES table into a single text field. Once I get the fields CAST as CHAR type, how do I concatenate them? I tried SUBSTR but it pukes on too man

Re: 3466 End-of-Life

2002-12-17 Thread Jolliff, Dale
The rumour I heard was that the NSM hardware/software support was going to be unbundled -- So after the upgrade to TSM 5.x, you are no longer forced to maintain "NSM configuration compliance" to conform with the NSM support scripts. I see this as a good thing, because that means that you can use r

Re: getting list of offsite vols for restore

2002-12-06 Thread Jolliff, Dale
restore volumes preview=yes pull the needed volume names from the activity log. -Original Message- From: Lee, Gary D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: getting list of offsite vols for restore Had this happen again yester

Re: 3494 Partitioning or TSM Library Manager

2002-12-04 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Have them take a look at PMR 02224,519 - we just upgraded from 4.2.1.15 to 4.2.30 because of an identified "internal defect". I don't have all the details in front of me, but at the 4.2.1.15 level there is apparently some communications issues. -Original Message- From: James, Phil [mailt

GUID in TSM

2002-12-04 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone have any experience with or know anything about the GUID stuff in the version 5 clients? According to the docs, it's a pre-req for installation, however, installations work and the client *seems* to function without it. Not much in the way of information about what it is or what it does, e

Iron Mountain response time

2002-11-07 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Here in North Texas, we have been told that Iron Mountain no longer supports a third shift. Because of this our emergency response times have been drastically altered. We had been looking at doing multiple tape runs per day in order to shorten our risk window. This bit of news obviously threw a wr

Inventory Query Backup ... lock conflict. WAS RE: TSM 5.1.5.1 F ailed Backups

2002-11-01 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I'm seeing this quite a bit on a very busy 4.2.2.13 server - and sometimes at about the same time we see ANS1301E on the client along with an ANE4987E with file from the \WINNT\system32\ directory. My suspicion is that what's happening is that a file that is now considered a "system object" is a

FW: ANR9999D Webinterface error !

2002-11-01 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I have seen this behavior in other areas of the web interface on 4.2.1.15. An example is creating storage pools with a "-" in the name. I haven't seen a crash from it. -Original Message- From: Bill Boyer [mailto:bill.boyer@;VERIZON.NET] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL

Arch.Description.Object

2002-10-31 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Is there an easy way to get rid of this, or I am stuck with an unload/load/audit? ALEDSMB 10/31/2002 08:40:10 ANR0104E IMARINS(1544): Error 2 deleting row from table ALEDSMB "Arch.Description.Objects". ALEDSMB 10/31/2002 08:40:10 ANRD IMUTIL(3809): Primary row for arc

Re: System Object expiration with 4.2.30

2002-10-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: System Object expiration with 4.2.30 Have you done "cleanup backupgroups"? Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon Inc. 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:xjolliff@;TI.COM] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:46 PM To: [

System Object expiration with 4.2.30

2002-10-21 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Has anyone seen positive confirmation of successful SYSTEM OBJECT expiration after upgrading to 4.2.3.0? I applied 4.2.3.0 to a netstor box this morning, and two expire inventory runs have completed successfully, but I have not seen any substantial change in our SYSTEM OBJECT problem.

Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?

2002-09-25 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I believe XP reports NT 5.1 -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6? W2K is known as NT 5.0 to TSM. Do a "q node blah f=d" for your client node on TSM server and s

Re: Transfer filespace?

2002-09-23 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Export and import. You'll have to do some renaming tricks with the node names though. -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Transfer filespace? Is there a way to transfer a filespace

4.2.x selects from DRIVE table

2002-09-19 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Something odd I noticed this morning about 4.2.x servers on AIX and Solaris - "query drive f=d" and "select * from drives" Displays values in the Device field, whereas a "select device from drives" displays a blank device field. This holds for 4.2.1.15 on Solaris and 4.2.2.{patch of the day}

FW: ANR9999D - ANR0197E

2002-09-17 Thread Jolliff, Dale
processing that checks for orphan segment entries has been modified to prevent inappropriately attempting to check a volume. -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager' Subject: ANRD - ANR0197E This is from

ANR9999D - ANR0197E

2002-09-17 Thread Jolliff, Dale
This is from a 4.2.1.15 server that is the library manager for 4 other TSM servers.. Anybody seen this before? 09/17/2002 09:07:53 ANR1181E astxn.c412: Data storage transaction 0:12456483 was aborted. 09/17/2002 09:07:53 ANRD asalloc.c(663): ThreadId<94> Volume E01710

Re: 3494 Utilization

2002-09-09 Thread Jolliff, Dale
be that's enough - why do you need drive-by-drive data rates? - Mr. Lindsay Morris CEO, Servergraph www.servergraph.com 859-253-8000 ofc 425-988-8478 fax > -Original Message- > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jolliff, Dale > S

Re: 3494 Utilization

2002-09-06 Thread Jolliff, Dale
l Message----- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3494 Utilization I saw this topic out on ADSM, and I could not locate any type of functional resolution ... What is everyone using to calculate the "wall

3494 Utilization

2002-09-05 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I saw this topic out on ADSM, and I could not locate any type of functional resolution ... What is everyone using to calculate the "wall time" of your tape drive utilization?

Exports under 4.2.2.x

2002-08-30 Thread Jolliff, Dale
When I do an export that takes longer than 24 hours, the USEDVOLUMELIST= parameter is ignored - the list file is not written. Can anyone confirm that behavior in other versions? This is a NetStore box, EC17, patched to the equivalent of 4.2.2.10 on AIX 5.1L with OS patch level 2.

Re: ANR9999 message Lock acquisition - TSM 4.2.1.15 server

2002-08-15 Thread Jolliff, Dale
>From my somewhat limited understanding of exactly what the RESOURCETIMEOUT does (and someone jump right in and correct me of I'm wrong) is that it is the "contention timer" for some resource contention situations in the DB - for example, setting the timeout to 10 minutes will purportedly only all

Re: ANR9999 message Lock acquisition - TSM 4.2.1.15 server

2002-08-15 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Just be aware of what lengthening the RESOURCETIMEOUT will do, especially if you are susceptible to "logpinned" conditions due to slow, long-running sessions. -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: ANR9999 message Lock acquisition - TSM 4.2.1.15 server

2002-08-15 Thread Jolliff, Dale
4.2.2.x servers on AIX are exhibiting the same problems, along with numerous others. Oddly enough, our 4.2.1.15 Solaris servers seem to be operating relatively smoothly. Note that I said "relatively" and they all have very small DB. We have an open crit-sit with IBM/Tivoli on an AIX 4.2.2.x serve

Re: windows client

2002-08-13 Thread Jolliff, Dale
sing some key in the registry that needs to be removed. -Original Message- From: Rob Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: windows client Is this from doing a restore or a save? Rob

windows client

2002-08-13 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anybody know how to cure this? 08/13/2002 12:15:36 psDeletePasswordFile(): RegOpenPathEx(): Win32 RC=2 . 08/13/2002 12:15:39 WritePswdToRegistry(): RegCreatePathEx(): Win32 RC=87 . 08/13/2002 12:15:40 fioGetAttrib(): getFileSecurityInfo(\\adsm2000\c$\) failed 08/13/2002 12:15:42 ANS1449E A requi

Re: Admin Help text is wrapping..

2002-07-30 Thread Jolliff, Dale
4.2.2.7 on a Netstor box help upd looks normal... -Original Message- From: Alexander Verkooyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Admin Help text is wrapping.. Hi, We upgraded from 4.2.1.11 to 4.2.2.7 (AIX 4.3.3 ML 10) la

Re: Occupancy comparison script

2002-07-26 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Thanks to everyone for the help. I haven't seen exactly what I'm looking for yet, so I'm inventing this wheel. I'll post back what I come up with. -Original Message- From: Ilja G. Coolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

Re: Offsite Archives & DRM

2002-07-25 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Why not just assign an overflow location then do a move media? You have to keep track of the tape movement manually, but at least the checkout part is simplified. -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

Re: Occupancy comparison script

2002-07-23 Thread Jolliff, Dale
-8180 -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Occupancy comparison script I know someone has already invented this wheel... I need to create a script to compare occupancy of primary sequential pools

Re: Occupancy comparison script

2002-07-23 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I don't think there is a quick answer; that's why I was hoping someone had already invented this wheel. Unless I'm missing some pretty big clues (which is very eminently possible) the report would require determining storage pool type to create a MB/File count "Primary Storage Pool" column and a

Re: Occupancy comparison script

2002-07-23 Thread Jolliff, Dale
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Occupancy comparison script Simple: backup stgpool primarypool copypool preview=yes Check the activity log, it will show which volumes would need to be mounted for a backup, if any. Mike. Jolliff, Dale

Occupancy comparison script

2002-07-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I know someone has already invented this wheel... I need to create a script to compare occupancy of primary sequential pools to copypools to verify a complete stgpool backup. Anyone got one handy that won't bring a server to it's knees?

Re: AIX Upgrade with TSM

2002-07-12 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Do a search on adsm.org for a post from me about this a month or two ago. We had EC17 applied to a netstore box - AIX 5.1L and TSM 4.2.2 Major gotchas - make sure you get 5100-02 applied to the OS right away, and go immediately to (at least) PTF level 4.2.2.6 if you are going to 4.2.2 -Ori

Re: End of Service for Server 4.2

2002-07-01 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Audit the volume once it's back in your library. -Original Message- From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: End of Service for Server 4.2 Hi: I have a volume in an odd state: VOLUME_NAME STGPOOL_NAME

Update RE: import archive problems on 4.1.2.15 Solaris

2002-06-27 Thread Jolliff, Dale
level 2 support says it appeared to be a problem with an admin client initiating a -consolemode session at the same time I did the import. Level 2 has kept a PMR open at sev2 to investigate the cause of the core dump. -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2

import archive problems on 4.1.2.15 solaris

2002-06-26 Thread Jolliff, Dale
The server still hasn't come back online - 125 minutes of log churning. Any ideas? ANR2017I Administrator issued command: IMPORT NODE DLECU filespace=/var filedata=archive devclass=FILE_CLASS volumename=FILE:/adsm-tmp/ADSM.S5123069.EXP ANR2345E IMPORT NODE: Içøä*,qª6q¯Pøäq0q=)OQøäóÿøä*,

Table Relationship

2002-06-21 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anything out there that talks about the table relationships in TSM? I'm looking for something that will make it a little easier to generate a pretty picture/chart/graph out of the way policy/domain/managementclass/storagepools relate.

Re: NSM Upgrade Experience

2002-06-21 Thread Jolliff, Dale
France [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 7:53 PM To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager' Cc: Jolliff, Dale Subject: RE: NSM Upgrade Experience Ooops... we just advised a customer to install 4.2.2.5 --- for SumTab fix, didn't know there is a (yet) new bug for expiration

Re: NSM Upgrade Experience

2002-06-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I got my 5100-02 patch when someone at 800-IBM-SERV was playing phone tag between myself and the CE when he was out investigating our PMH on duplicate IP addresses. I was told by level 2 this afternoon to avoid expiration on 4.2.2.4 until 4.2.2.6 is available Real Soon Now. -Original

RE: Réf. : Re: NSM Upgrade Experience

2002-06-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Guillaume Gilbert CGI Canada "Jolliff, Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2002-06-20 14:10:07 Veuillez répondre à "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pour :

Re: NSM Upgrade Experience

2002-06-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
70 and 110GB so database corruption is somewhat of a concern to us. Regards Rizwan -Original Message- From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NSM Upgrade Experience Our NSM support contract calls for a CE onsite t

page_shadow_token

2002-06-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
What is, and how is the page_shadow_token calculated/created in the dsmserv.dsk file?

Re: Select statements

2002-06-20 Thread Jolliff, Dale
* Wanda Prather The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab 443-778-8769 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" - Scott Adams/Dilbert ******** -Original

Re: DB backups

2002-06-14 Thread Jolliff, Dale
D] Subject: Re: DB backups We changed our roll forward to NORMAL and have seen very little (once in a year) crash due to full recovery log. This may be an option instead of the type FILE. "Jolliff, Dale"To:

Re: DB backups

2002-06-14 Thread Jolliff, Dale
: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jolliff, Dale > Is anyone doing db backups to disk using devclass type FILE? Yes. > I know, it's not necessarily a good thing, but right now we have a db that > is large enough that the log can fill before a full db backup

DB backups

2002-06-14 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Is anyone doing db backups to disk using devclass type FILE? I know, it's not necessarily a good thing, but right now we have a db that is large enough that the log can fill before a full db backup can run. Before I set this up, I'm wondering if anyone else is doing this.

Re: TSM aix server code 4.2.2.4

2002-06-13 Thread Jolliff, Dale
4.2.2.4 helped us some, but we are still seeing some serious issues. I tend toward the opinion that the issues really stem from some corruption that existed prior to the upgrade, but regardless, the lock problems have not been completely resolved in 4.2.2.4 -Original Message- From: Burto

Re: Management class question

2002-06-12 Thread Jolliff, Dale
For the MIGRATIONREQUIRESBACKUP property, the Admin Reference guide says "Specifies whether a backup version of a file must exist before the file can be migrated" doh. Is there a better explanation of this property somewhere?

Re: TSM 4.2 server on Solaris 2.8

2002-06-06 Thread Jolliff, Dale
ubject: Re: TSM 4.2 server on Solaris 2.8 Dale, doublecheck the option spelling .. HTTPPORT "Jolliff, Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05-Jun-2002 15:39 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Man

TSM 4.2 server on Solaris 2.8

2002-06-05 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Anyone have any idea why a second instance of TSM server on Solaris will ignore HTTPORT setting in the dsmserv.opt file?

FYI -- 510C dsmadmc

2002-05-31 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Be aware that it appears that using the Solaris admin client (dsmadmc) from version 510C will cause "ANR2032E Command failed - internal server error detected." messages to occur on some older TSM servers. I'm experiencing this when attached to a 3.7.4.6 server on AIX. Logging in and using t

Re: labeling 3590 volumes

2002-05-24 Thread Jolliff, Dale
: Re: labeling 3590 volumes I did a "Help Label" in TSM and if I'm thinking what you want... here it is labe libv library_name volume_name overwrite=yes Dave Pearson Comptuer & Nework Service Snohomish County PUD # 1 > -Original Message- > From: Jolliff, Da

labeling 3590 volumes

2002-05-24 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Is there anyway to overwrite the header/label of a 3590 tape? One of our ATLs had a problem with some 3590 drives and chewed up the header records. The assumption is that the tape is good, the header records are just bad. I would restore the volumes from the copypools, but it just so happened th

Include/Excludes revisited - again, for the 5.x client systemobje ct

2002-05-22 Thread Jolliff, Dale
Server: TSM 4.2.2.0 / 3466 configuration Client: TSM 4.2.1.19 and 5.1.01 on Win2K (Partial) Option set as displayed from client with dsmc "q incexcl" Excl All *\...\*.exeServer Excl All *\...\*.dllServer This should exclude any file(s) in any

linux client on zseries 390

2002-05-17 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I have an admin that is trying to get the TSM client (TSM420_LINUX390.tar.Z) running on: > 3. The version of linux we are using is a 64-bit implementation of red hat > linux 2.4.7 called ThinkBlue. It was done by Millenux which is a partner with IBM Germany in > its porting and is specifically d

  1   2   >