Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi Jonathan! That's exactly the reason I decided to go with Soundforge! - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:07 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi all, some interesting points in this thread. From my point of view, if > you're willing to invest in the tool that gets the job done most > efficiently, Sound Forge is so far ahead that Goldwave isn't even worth > your > consideration. I say this because the reason Sound Forge became the > leading > single track editor in the blind community is because of the way in which > it > embraces standard Windows navigation and selection methods. So if you're a > competent user of word processors like MS word, and you understand how to > select text in regular Windows applications, your learning curve with > Sound > Forge is minimised hugely. I would put Studio Recorder way ahead of > Goldwave > and in some respects better than Sound Forge for certain tasks. For > example, > the sound don sound feature in the latest Studio Recorder is incredibly > easy > to use, yet powerful. It also attempts where possible to adhere to Windows > standards. It's special accessibility features make it worthy of serious > consideration, particularly if you don't require lots of special affects. > > For those constrained by limited time, selecting and manipulating sound in > Sound Forge or Studio Recorder is vastly more efficient than Goldwave is. > > If money is a consideration, I would still recommend Sound Forge's cut > down > version because of the superior adherence to Windows conventions, although > Goldwave is definitely more feature rich than this version of Sound Forge. > If you're not serious about sound editing and want something to play with, > maybe Goldwave is sufficient. Sound Forge is used in many professional > environments for a good reason. It's powerful. Perhaps it provides more > power than some people need, but really, there's no comparison in terms of > functionality and ease of use, and you may find yourself gaining more > experience and find Goldwave constraining. So depending on your needs, I'd > say Sound Forge and Studio Recorder are in a class of their own. Goldwave > is > in a different class. > > The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. > > http://www.the-minx.com > Jonathan Mosen > Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com > Ph: +1-925-566-9265. > Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
gold wave can't move finish marker
Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can though, move the start marker without a problem. Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? HF ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program is awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. - Original Message - From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How > much > : finer do you want than that? > : > : Bruce > : > : -- > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV > : > : Bruce Toews > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: > : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise > or > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any > price. > : > > : > - Original Message - > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : > > : > > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have > to > : >> take > : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! > What > : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what > you > : >> can > : >> afford! > : >> - Original Message - > : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM > : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : >> > : >> > : >>> HI, > : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. > : >>> > : >>> Best regards > : >>> Brian > : >>> - Original Message - > : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM > : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : >>> > : >>> > : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder from > APH > : is > : also quite a program! > : - Original Message - > : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM > : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : > : > : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide > what > : > they > : > really need to do, and after all that then make the decision on > how much > : > they are willing to pay to get the editor that will do what they > need to > : > do. I really like SoundForge, but I do a lot of audio for radio > : > programs, > : > etc. The person simply wanting to get records to MP3 and clean > the > : > files > : > up to make them sound good may decide that they don't need all the > : > features > : > of Soundforge, and that they can good enough quality with Goldwave > or > : > Audasity or something else. > : > > : > > : > > : > - Original Message - > : > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:06 AM > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : > > : > > : > : Hello. I prefer Sound Forge because of the scrubbing features it > has. > : > I > : > also > : > : like the effects but don't get me wrong, Gold Wave is a very > good > : > program. > : > : For me Sound forge is a little bit more accessible. Of course, > Sound > : > Forge > : > : was the first editor I had experience with and that I think does > : > color > : > an > : > : oppion sometimes. It's like finding a car though. You can find 6 > : > people > : > who > : > : like Fords and 6 people who like shevys. The best way is first, > can > : > you > : > : afford both programs in question and then second, download and > try > : > out > : > each > : > : demo. > : >
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a totorial at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins and outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and no scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program >is > awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. > > - Original Message - > From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things >>like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are >>the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person >>should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>price >>range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave >>will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with >>getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How >> much >> : finer do you want than that? >> : >> : Bruce >> : >> : -- >> : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >> : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >> : >> : Bruce Toews >> : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >> : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): >> http://www.ogts.net >> : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >> : >> : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: >> : >> : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise >> or >> : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any >> price. >> : > >> : > - Original Message - >> : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM >> : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> : > >> : > >> : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have >> to >> : >> take >> : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! >> What >> : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what >> you >> : >> can >> : >> afford! >> : >> - Original Message - >> : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM >> : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> : >> >> : >> >> : >>> HI, >> : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. >> : >>> >> : >>> Best regards >> : >>> Brian >> : >>> - Original Message - >> : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM >> : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> : >>> >> : >>> >> : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder >> from >> APH >> : is >> : also quite a program! >> : - Original Message - >> : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM >> : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> : >> : >> : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide >> what >> : > they >> : > really need to do, and after all that then make the decision on >> how much >> : > they are willing to pay to get the editor that will do what they >> need to >> : > do. I really like SoundForge, but I do a lot of audio for radio >> : > programs, >> : > etc. The person simply wanting to get records to MP3 and clean >> the >> : > files >> : > up to make them sound good may decide that they don't need all >> the >> : > features >> : > of Soundforge, and that they can good enough quality with >> Goldwave >> or >> : > Audasity or something else. >> : > >> : > >> : > >> : > - Original Message - >> : > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> : > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:06 AM >> : > Subject: Re: g
Re: broadcasting question
Well that is certainly refreshing news to hear. The thing is that blind audio editors take their craft seriously, and will take the time to listen to the inprofections in an audio bite and will take the necessary measures to make the right corrections. This particular field is a natural for us, as we depend so much on our hearing. Too bad that the commercial broadcasters are not willing to acknowledge our gifted abilities. I cringe when I hear music that for some reason just doesn't fit in with the flow. - From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:15 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > Well, maybe so, I will never say never because never is a mighty long > time. > But, When do you think they would install the speech and all that stuff. > Very few, I say few engineers would want to take their main automation > computer offline to not only just install the stuff, but test it. The > folks > who mention small station are right on target. A radio Reading Service > isn't > a bad way to get experience either. I think if I were to advise any young > blind people going in to radio based on my 31 years of experience alone > and > what I think I know about the changing industry, I would recommend talk > radio, behind the scenes stuff, or production. Have a good voice thought > or > you won't get pass the lobby. The only reason I've been able to do > anything > in this industry is because somebody thought my voice could make them some > money. > > Just some thoughts and they are just my thoughts. I certainly don't know > everything. I'd love someone to prove me wrong. One thing I have noticed > though. Whenever I could give someone a job, I always asked blind people I > knew first. I hope that is a trend that is continuing. Also, if a Reading > Service control room and entire operation can not be used by blind people, > and if they don't have at least one blind person working on the job, or if > they haven't made an attempt to hire a blind person, they should NOT GET > ANY > federal or state money. We have all blind techs and are very proud of that > fact. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:48 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >>I could see a braille display being of help, even if it's a referbed >>braille >> lite 20 or 40 bought from FS for around $1900. In that type of situation, >> things could work all right as long as one got all the info that is >> needed. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:39 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> You are so correct. I have a friend at our local adult sstation who >>> tells >>> me >>> when he has a shift, he goes in to the control room and has two buttons. >>> One >>> is the mic, and the other is marked "Next Event!" All of his scripts are >>> on >>> the screne as is his log, playlist, show, you name it. Not many stations >>> use >>> CD's anymore, and get their music from a music service or download a >>> packagge from somewhere. >>> >>> There are some blind people doing operations work and behind the scene >>> stuff, but I don't know of many on the air. I would like to hear from >>> anybody using Audiovolt, and other stuff. I've used Enco on a limmited >>> bassis, and it does work with Window-eyes right out of the box as do >>> many >>> many things, including Sound Forge although the sets do help. >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:09 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> It is my understanding that the 1500 songs that most stations have on their rotating play list are downloaded from special websites that are set up by the record companies and are simply inserted into the daily play list, thus eliminating this particular function. At one time I was a music librarian for a Canadian public broadcaster. It was my job to order and catalogue all of the music into a national database with a number of different information fields to be filled in by the person doing the cataloguing. Back then we had physical compact discs that we could actually hold in our hands. Today all of that music is on a hard drive. If you are an oldies station there are companies that will actually send you a physical hard drive that is preloaded with any type of music that you desire. The drive costs about 200-dollars. This is far less than actually going out to buy all of that music. In most stations that I have visited in the past year or so, you would be hard pressed to find a compact disc
Re: broadcasting question
I have only used Dallett, and that was simply a matter of blocking your edit and hitting the delete key, and that portion of the sound bite was gone. With Dallett you are given the option to reinsert the portion of the clip that was deleted. - Original Message - From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > Oh, I thought that was the broadcast automation where you'd import the wav > files or whatever from another editor into. I think the best interface is > probably Studio Recorder from APH because it has the sound forge feel to > it > with the brackets doing selecting and the ability to scrub ahead and such. > It really doesn't take much to take out something and have it sound like > it > was never there. The thing that it does that Goldwave doesn't, at least > from > what I gather, is to give me a goto time function that I can just type in > "+3:00" or whatever to go 3 minutes ahead or whatever I need to find the > next place to delete or end the deletion or whatever. > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:03 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> Blind people, in my view can play a tremendous role behind the scenes if >> only given the chance. In mhy case I was labeled as one of the best audio >> editors in the business. Keep in mind that in those days we had nothing >> more >> to work with than a greese pencil, audio tape and splicing tape. Today >> working with any of the editing programs is a breeze. With the best of >> physical editing we could never achieve the accuracy that electronic >> editing >> brings to this new age of technology. I have yet to play with some of >> these >> programs. My experience has only been with a program caalled Dallett. >> Wit Dallett you can do just about anything that you can do with sound >> forge >> and gold wave. You don't want to go out and buy Dallett unless you have >> very >> deep pockets, and I mean deep pockets. . >> - Original Message - >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:39 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> You are so correct. I have a friend at our local adult sstation who >>> tells >>> me >>> when he has a shift, he goes in to the control room and has two buttons. >>> One >>> is the mic, and the other is marked "Next Event!" All of his scripts are >>> on >>> the screne as is his log, playlist, show, you name it. Not many stations >>> use >>> CD's anymore, and get their music from a music service or download a >>> packagge from somewhere. >>> >>> There are some blind people doing operations work and behind the scene >>> stuff, but I don't know of many on the air. I would like to hear from >>> anybody using Audiovolt, and other stuff. I've used Enco on a limmited >>> bassis, and it does work with Window-eyes right out of the box as do >>> many >>> many things, including Sound Forge although the sets do help. >>> >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:09 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> It is my understanding that the 1500 songs that most stations have on their rotating play list are downloaded from special websites that are set up by the record companies and are simply inserted into the daily play list, thus eliminating this particular function. At one time I was a music librarian for a Canadian public broadcaster. It was my job to order and catalogue all of the music into a national database with a number of different information fields to be filled in by the person doing the cataloguing. Back then we had physical compact discs that we could actually hold in our hands. Today all of that music is on a hard drive. If you are an oldies station there are companies that will actually send you a physical hard drive that is preloaded with any type of music that you desire. The drive costs about 200-dollars. This is far less than actually going out to buy all of that music. In most stations that I have visited in the past year or so, you would be hard pressed to find a compact disc fullof music. The most recent station that I visited was nothing more than a computer, a small control board, and a 125 watt transmitter that was about the size of an average toaster. I have also worked at stations that had a transmitter that was about the size of a house and was water cooled. Believe me I have been there and done that. All that I can say is that one has to be nuts to be in this business. You either love it o
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi Folks: Well! This has indeed been an interesting thread. Perhaps it would be a good idea if someone, who is well versed in sound editing, could give a side-bi-side comparison, emphasizing the strengths similarities, and weaknesses of both editors. This is especially important for those who have not yet formed a bias to one or the other programs. In otherwards, let's get the facts. I would also recommend that the work be accomplished without the use of script or set files as this would most certainly affect the outcome. SF has had a lot of work done on Scripts over the years: both free and comercial scripts. Now it may be, that one or the other programs is better suited for scripting or creating set files. This too is a very important item for consideration and certainly may be a factor in determining which editor one should purchase. It is, however, important to distinguish between the off-the-shelf capabilities of the editor it self as apposed to the addition of Script or Set files. Thanks all over the place for listening. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which work well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they work fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is also an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not interst me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as I respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers approach the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, decide which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I don't purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. They have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before purchasing it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. Larry - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound > Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about > audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is > with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go with > what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. > > Bruce > > -- > Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he > gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV > > Bruce Toews > E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net > Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > > On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: > >> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with >> Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold >> Wave,seems, >> frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by any >> means (groan)! >> >> -Mac- >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM >> Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be >> considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by >> many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no >> professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and >> there are people who are much more professional than I with recording who >> will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound >> editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, >> then the power is there. >> >> bruce >> >> > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
whare can i get dc6. i would like to take a look at it. - Original Message - From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:49 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's > the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which work > well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they work > fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is > also > an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs > tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not > interst > me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as I > respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers > approach > the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, decide > which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I > don't > purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned > before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone > considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. > They > have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before > purchasing > it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. > > Larry > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound >> Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about >> audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is >> with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go with >> what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. >> >> Bruce >> >> -- >> Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >> gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >> >> Bruce Toews >> E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >> Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net >> Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >> >> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: >> >>> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with >>> Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold >>> Wave,seems, >>> frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by >>> any >>> means (groan)! >>> >>> -Mac- >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM >>> Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> >>> I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be >>> considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is >>> by >>> many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no >>> professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and >>> there are people who are much more professional than I with recording >>> who >>> will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound >>> editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, >>> then the power is there. >>> >>> bruce >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
If I recall, DC6 wasn't good enough for editing at all, and if I am going to spend $200.00 for an editor, I'll buy Soundforge thank you. I think goldwave has in some respects better noise reduction than DC6. all the programs have good and bad points respectively. - Original Message - From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:49 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's > the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which work > well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they work > fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is > also > an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs > tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not > interst > me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as I > respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers > approach > the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, decide > which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I > don't > purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned > before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone > considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. > They > have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before > purchasing > it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. > > Larry > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound >> Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about >> audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is >> with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go with >> what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. >> >> Bruce >> >> -- >> Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >> gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >> >> Bruce Toews >> E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >> Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net >> Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >> >> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: >> >>> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with >>> Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold >>> Wave,seems, >>> frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by >>> any >>> means (groan)! >>> >>> -Mac- >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM >>> Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> >>> I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be >>> considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is >>> by >>> many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no >>> professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and >>> there are people who are much more professional than I with recording >>> who >>> will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound >>> editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, >>> then the power is there. >>> >>> bruce >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi Dennis. You can read about DC6 and access its demo from here. http://www.diamondcut.com/Catalog/DC6.htm Larry - Original Message - From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:07 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > whare can i get dc6. i would like to take a look at it. > - Original Message - > From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:49 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's >> the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which >> work >> well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they >> work >> fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is >> also >> an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs >> tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not >> interst >> me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as >> I >> respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers >> approach >> the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, >> decide >> which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I >> don't >> purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned >> before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone >> considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. >> They >> have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before >> purchasing >> it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. >> >> Larry >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound >>> Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about >>> audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is >>> with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go >>> with >>> what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> -- >>> Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >>> gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >>> >>> Bruce Toews >>> E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >>> Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net >>> Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >>> >>> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: >>> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold Wave,seems, frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by any means (groan)! -Mac- - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and there are people who are much more professional than I with recording who will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, then the power is there. bruce >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com __
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
If DC6 didn't work for you, then by all means don't use it. The same applies to any software I believe. Cheers, Larry - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:16 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > If I recall, DC6 wasn't good enough for editing at all, and if I am going > to > spend $200.00 for an editor, I'll buy Soundforge thank you. I think > goldwave > has in some respects better noise reduction than DC6. all the programs > have > good and bad points respectively. > > - Original Message - > From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:49 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then it's >> the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which >> work >> well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they >> work >> fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is >> also >> an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it performs >> tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not >> interst >> me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as >> I >> respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers >> approach >> the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, >> decide >> which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I >> don't >> purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned >> before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone >> considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. >> They >> have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before >> purchasing >> it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. >> >> Larry >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound >>> Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about >>> audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is >>> with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go >>> with >>> what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>> -- >>> Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >>> gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >>> >>> Bruce Toews >>> E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >>> Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net >>> Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >>> >>> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: >>> But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable with Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold Wave,seems, frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by any means (groan)! -Mac- - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and there are people who are much more professional than I with recording who will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, then the power is there. bruce >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To u
Re: broadcasting question
that would be my response as well At 05:34 PM 5/25/2006, you wrote: >Hi, > >Boy are they full of it. > >Rick > > >=== > >Contact Information: > >Skype ID: rharmon928 >MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Phone: 330-724-6093 >Location: Akron, Ohio USA > >Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > >blind_geek_zone > > >"The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of >seeing people towards them." >- Helen Keller, 1925 > > > >- Original Message - >From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "PC audio discussion list. " >Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM >Subject: broadcasting question > > >hi list, >I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are people out >there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a course >for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a blind >person attending. > >Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Unfortunately this >is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly because >the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would exceed over >$500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their corporate >ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to create a >studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, wanted >to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I truly wish you >well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you require >further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once again, >thank you for your interest in CSMB. > >Regards > >Jacquie Hammond >President/CSMB > >Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able to, as >far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, and >they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a simple >matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has anyone got any >clues? >thanks >Brandon Hicks >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Skype: callto://reyuth >msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >___ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > >___ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other >lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
GREAT. THANKS. - Original Message - From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:15 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi Dennis. You can read about DC6 and access its demo from here. > http://www.diamondcut.com/Catalog/DC6.htm > > Larry > > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:07 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> whare can i get dc6. i would like to take a look at it. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Larry N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:49 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I have to agree with Bruce here. If you're comfortable with it, then >>>it's >>> the best software for you. I own both GoldWave and DC6, both of which >>> work >>> well with screen readers. I use both professionally and together,they >>> work >>> fine for what I need at a lower cost than Sound Forge. . Sound Forge is >>> also >>> an excellent program. No argument here. But the thing is that it >>> performs >>> tasks that I'll never need, which give it a price tag that does not >>> interst >>> me. . I would not suggest a contest between GoldWave and Sound Forge, as >>> I >>> respect the merrits of both. Rather I would suggest that consumers >>> approach >>> the process as they would any other purchase. Determine your needs, >>> decide >>> which software package would best meet them and buy it. Personally, I >>> don't >>> purchase any software that I can't try before buying. I've been burned >>> before and won't be again. My last suggestion would be that anyone >>> considering an audio editor might want to think about giving DC6 a try. >>> They >>> have a demo that let's you try all aspects of the program before >>> purchasing >>> it. You just can't save anything in demo mode. Jus my 2 cents. >>> >>> Larry >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:16 PM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> No artument there. My argument isn't about the lack of merit of Sound Forge. Jonathan was saying that anyone who is at all semi-serious about audio editing shouldn't even give Gold Wave a second though, and it is with this point that I respectuflly disagree. I've said all along go with what you're most comfortable witha dn what works for you. Bruce -- Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Thu, 25 May 2006, Mac Norins wrote: > But, if we are not comfortable with Goldwave and we are comfortable > with > Soundforge, then exploring another new way to go, such as Gold > Wave,seems, > frankly, like an exercise in futility! Not to extend this thread, by > any > means (groan)! > > -Mac- > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:17 PM > Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge > > > I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be > considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is > by > many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no > professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, > and > there are people who are much more professional than I with recording > who > will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound > editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am, > then the power is there. > > bruce > > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >>> http://www.pc-audio.org >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >>> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> >> >> __
RE: Instant Replay Software
What about placing shortcuts to the wav files on your desktop and assigning a shortcut key stroke to kick off the file? T --- Reid my Mind at: http://tsreid.blogspot.com --- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Rufo Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:10 AM To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org Subject: Instant Replay Software Hi David, I work for the local Radio Reading service of Central Massachusetts. When I'm not doing the 9 to 5 thing I volunteer my time to host a radio program that covers a wide variety of blind related issues. The station is not net based and therefore I am not using Shoutcast. Simply put all of my broadcasts go from an analog board directly out over the airwaves. While the majority of my shows are prerecorded which gives me the ability to place nutty sound clips or effects after the fact I am planning on doing some live broadcasts. My plan was to plug my computer directly into the board and turn it into an instant replay machine which would give me the ability to play clips or sounds on the fly. I use winamp as my default player and am running Jaws 7.0. I guess I could just create a play list of clips I want to use on the fly but having to arrow through a list and select the sound I want to play seems like a bit of a pain. If I could trigger each sound clip assigned to individual hot keys it would be a cleaner and quicker approach when accessing the files. You had mentioned that assigning hot keys to specific clips may be something that could be accomplished with scripting. That's a most interesting idea. If you have any further input on how this could be accomplished please let me know. Feel free to contact me off list if you like. Thanks, Jay Hi Mate, Tell me more about your Broadcasting set-up. If you are using Jaws, this could easily be done with scripting. I am guessing you are using Winamp and the shoutcast plugin with one sound card using the what you hear as the input? Greetings folks, I am seeking your input with regard to accessible instant replay software. I host a humble little radio program and would like the ability to instantly play a few wacky sound effects on the fly. I am seeking a program that would allow me to line up 5 to 10 short sound clips and play each clip at the push of a button. For example, if I had ten sound clips each clip would be assigned it's own hot key. Every time I hit any one of these ten hot keys the corresponding clip would instantly play. In the old days DJ's used to use cart machines and today use digital jingle machines to accomplish this task. While some of these digital devices are semi accessible, most are ridiculously expensive. After consulting the net I noticed that several companies sell software that simulate cart machines or today's digital equivalent. I downloaded various demo's of this type of software only to discover that nun of them are even remotely accessible with a screen reader. If anyone knows of a program that would allow me to play sound clips at the push of a button, or has a solution to my inquiry, I would appreciate your input. Thanks, Jay ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Rockbox Recording Settings Not Spoken
mono / stereo recording is not an option on the Iriver. the Iriver always record in stereo I think at 44100 KHZ Wav file. *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 23/05/2006 at 15:28 Gary King wrote: >I am using the May 22 daily build for Rockbox on my iRiver 120. I no >longer >hear some of the recording settings spoken when I go through the settings >menu. An important one that is missing is the choice that sets the sample >rate. Mono and stereo choices seem to also be missing. I am using a voice >file from May 15. Is anyone else experiencing this? > >Gary King >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >___ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Rockbox Recording Settings Not Spoken
Hi Arnaud, Are you saying that this is an I River limitation or Rockbox? Jean - Original Message - From: "Arnaud de Bonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:15 PM Subject: Re: Rockbox Recording Settings Not Spoken > mono / stereo recording is not an option on the Iriver. > > the Iriver always record in stereo I think at 44100 KHZ Wav file. > > > > *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > On 23/05/2006 at 15:28 Gary King wrote: > > >I am using the May 22 daily build for Rockbox on my iRiver 120. I no > >longer > >hear some of the recording settings spoken when I go through the settings > >menu. An important one that is missing is the choice that sets the sample > >rate. Mono and stereo choices seem to also be missing. I am using a voice > >file from May 15. Is anyone else experiencing this? > > > >Gary King > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >___ > >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > >http://www.pc-audio.org > > > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > >offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? HF - Original Message - From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine > for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers > with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball > braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a totorial > at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins and > outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and no > scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program >>is >> awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things >>>like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>>compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs >>>are >>>the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person >>>should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>>price >>>range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave >>>will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with >>>getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> >>> : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How >>> much >>> : finer do you want than that? >>> : >>> : Bruce >>> : >>> : -- >>> : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >>> : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >>> : >>> : Bruce Toews >>> : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net >>> : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): >>> http://www.ogts.net >>> : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com >>> : >>> : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: >>> : >>> : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise >>> or >>> : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any >>> price. >>> : > >>> : > - Original Message - >>> : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM >>> : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : > >>> : > >>> : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you >>> have >>> to >>> : >> take >>> : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! >>> What >>> : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what >>> you >>> : >> can >>> : >> afford! >>> : >> - Original Message - >>> : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM >>> : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : >> >>> : >> >>> : >>> HI, >>> : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. >>> : >>> >>> : >>> Best regards >>> : >>> Brian >>> : >>> - Original Message - >>> : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM >>> : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : >>> >>> : >>> >>> : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder >>> from >>> APH >>> : is >>> : also quite a program! >>> : - Original Message - >>> : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM >>> : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> : >>> : >>> : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide >>> what >>> : > they >>> : > really need to do, and after all that then make the decision on >>> how much >>> : > they are willing to pay to get the editor that will do what they >>> need to >>> : > do. I really like SoundForge, but I do a lot of audio for radio >>> : > programs, >>> : > etc. The person simply wanting to get records to MP3 and clean >>> the >>> : > files >>> : > up to make them sound good may decide that they don't need all >>> the >>> : >>
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself startbutton did it. its in 10 parts. - Original Message - From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? > > HF > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine >> for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers >> with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball >> braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a >> totorial >> at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins >> and >> outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and >> no >> scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program >>>is >>> awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How much : finer do you want than that? : : Bruce : : -- : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV : : Bruce Toews : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com : : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: : : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise or : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any price. : > : > - Original Message - : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have to : >> take : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! What : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what you : >> can : >> afford! : >> - Original Message - : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : >> : >> : >>> HI, : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. : >>> : >>> Best regards : >>> Brian : >>> - Original Message - : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : >>> : >>> : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder from APH : is : also quite a program! : - Original Message - : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : : : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide what : > they :
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it. I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at: www.blindcooltech.com Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself startbutton did it. its in 10 parts. - Original Message - From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? > > HF > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine >> for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers >> with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball >> braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a >> totorial >> at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins >> and >> outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and >> no >> scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program >>>is >>> awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How much : finer do you want than that? : : Bruce : : -- : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV : : Bruce Toews : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com : : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: : : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise or : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any price. : > : > - Original Message - : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have to : >> take : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! What : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what you : >> can : >> afford! : >> - Original Message - : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : >> : >> : >>> HI, : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. : >>> : >>> Best regards : >>> Brian : >>> - Original Message - : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " :
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
i'm gonna check it out. do you cover anything that startbutton missed on his? also i use a multy track recorder called ntrack studio and i use the pluggins from it in goldwave and they work great.the efects are better. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it. > > I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at: > > www.blindcooltech.com > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself > startbutton > did it. its in 10 parts. > - Original Message - > From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? >> >> HF >> - Original Message - >> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine >>> for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers >>> with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball >>> braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a >>> totorial >>> at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins >>> and >>> outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and >>> no >>> scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program is awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. - Original Message - From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >things >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs >are >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >person >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >price >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >Goldwave >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned >with >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. > How > much > : finer do you want than that? > : > : Bruce > : > : -- > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV > : > : Bruce Toews > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): > http://www.ogts.net > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: > : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more > precise > or > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at > any > price. > : > > : > - Original Message - > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > : > > : > > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you > have > to > : >> take > : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound > editor! > What > : >> features an
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
Hello I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, but holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key will place the marker at the current position in the file. Ron - Original Message - From: HF To: PC audio discussion list. Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can though, move the start marker without a problem. Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? HF ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi not really except I go over the scripts a bit on part 2. The rest goes over the basics. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:18 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge i'm gonna check it out. do you cover anything that startbutton missed on his? also i use a multy track recorder called ntrack studio and i use the pluggins from it in goldwave and they work great.the efects are better. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it. > > I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at: > > www.blindcooltech.com > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself > startbutton > did it. its in 10 parts. > - Original Message - > From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? >> >> HF >> - Original Message - >> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine >>> for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers >>> with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball >>> braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a >>> totorial >>> at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins >>> and >>> outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and >>> no >>> scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program is awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. - Original Message - From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >things >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs >are >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >person >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >price >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >Goldwave >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned >with >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. > How > much > : finer do you want than that? > : > : Bruce > : > : -- > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV > : > : Bruce Toews > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): > http://www.ogts.net > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com > : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: > : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a m
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
cool. i'll check it out. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:46 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi not really except I go over the scripts a bit on part 2. The rest goes > over the basics. > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:18 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > i'm gonna check it out. do you cover anything that startbutton missed on > his? also i use a multy track recorder called ntrack studio and i use the > pluggins from it in goldwave and they work great.the efects are better. > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it. >> >> I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at: >> >> www.blindcooltech.com >> >> Rick >> >> >> === >> >> Contact Information: >> >> Skype ID: rharmon928 >> MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Phone: 330-724-6093 >> Location: Akron, Ohio USA >> >> Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org >> >> blind_geek_zone >> >> >> "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of >> seeing people towards them." >> - Helen Keller, 1925 >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself >> startbutton >> did it. its in 10 parts. >> - Original Message - >> From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? >>> >>> HF >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a totorial at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins and outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and no scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the >program >is > awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. > > - Original Message - > From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >>things >>like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs >>are >>the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >>person >>should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>price >>range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >>Goldwave >>will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned >>with >>getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. >> How >> much >> : finer do you want than that? >> : >> : Bruce >> : >> : -- >> : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he >> : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV >> : >> : Bruce Toe
RE: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound Forge without scripts. I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the differences. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Start buttons is better than mine, but I hang out on BCT and people are always wanting goldwave tutorials. And after listening to start buttons I felt inspired to try doing one of my own. Hope you like it. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 3:03 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge cool. i'll check it out. - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:46 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi not really except I go over the scripts a bit on part 2. The rest goes > over the basics. > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:18 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > > i'm gonna check it out. do you cover anything that startbutton missed on > his? also i use a multy track recorder called ntrack studio and i use the > pluggins from it in goldwave and they work great.the efects are better. > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:44 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >> That is a great tutorial. I learned a lot from it. >> >> I have a 3 part soon to be 4 partgoldwave tutorial at: >> >> www.blindcooltech.com >> >> Rick >> >> >> === >> >> Contact Information: >> >> Skype ID: rharmon928 >> MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Phone: 330-724-6093 >> Location: Akron, Ohio USA >> >> Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org >> >> blind_geek_zone >> >> >> "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of >> seeing people towards them." >> - Helen Keller, 1925 >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:35 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >> for the people. in the galaxy of stars. a guy who calls himself >> startbutton >> did it. its in 10 parts. >> - Original Message - >> From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:24 PM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>> That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? >>> >>> HF >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a totorial at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins and outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and no scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the >program >is > awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. > > - Original Message - > From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am >>things >>like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, >>compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs >>are >>the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a >>person >>should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a >>price >>range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that >>Goldwave >>will be
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
You mean, you might "update" the famous Soundforge tutorials, with a Gold wave comparison? How many years ago was that done (Soundforge, I mean)? -Mac- - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:14 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound Forge without scripts. I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the differences. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
RE: gold wave vs sound forge
Hi mac, Forging Ahead, the Sound Forge tutorial was completed in 2000, although the basic concepts are the same so it's still relevant. It wouldn't be an update of that tutorial so much as an evaluation of performance, functionality, efficiency, consistency with Windows standards and ease of use. It's certainly not something I'd attempt until I move though. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 -Original Message- From: Mac Norins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 2:25 p.m. To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge You mean, you might "update" the famous Soundforge tutorials, with a Gold wave comparison? How many years ago was that done (Soundforge, I mean)? -Mac- - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:14 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound Forge without scripts. I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the differences. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Yeah, I have those tapes; they are golden to me, no pun intended! I will look forward to your evaluations! - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:33 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge Hi mac, Forging Ahead, the Sound Forge tutorial was completed in 2000, although the basic concepts are the same so it's still relevant. It wouldn't be an update of that tutorial so much as an evaluation of performance, functionality, efficiency, consistency with Windows standards and ease of use. It's certainly not something I'd attempt until I move though. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 -Original Message- From: Mac Norins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 2:25 p.m. To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge You mean, you might "update" the famous Soundforge tutorials, with a Gold wave comparison? How many years ago was that done (Soundforge, I mean)? -Mac- - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:14 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound Forge without scripts. I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the differences. The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. http://www.the-minx.com Jonathan Mosen Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com Ph: +1-925-566-9265. Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
This doesn't sound like they were maybe being totally fair with you! - Original Message - From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM Subject: broadcasting question > hi list, > I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are people > out > there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a course > for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a blind > person attending. > > Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Unfortunately > this > is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly because > the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would exceed > over > $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their corporate > ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to create a > studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, > wanted > to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I truly wish you > well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you require > further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once again, > thank you for your interest in CSMB. > > Regards > > Jacquie Hammond > President/CSMB > > Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able to, > as > far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, and > they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a > simple > matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has anyone got any > clues? > thanks > Brandon Hicks > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: callto://reyuth > msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
RE: broadcasting question
Brandon, That's bunch of crap. I'm totally blind and have been in the industry for 15 years. They have a lot of growing up to do Hit me back, and we can talk about it. -Original Message- From: Gary Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:00 PM To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: broadcasting question This doesn't sound like they were maybe being totally fair with you! - Original Message - From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM Subject: broadcasting question > hi list, > I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are > people > out > there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a course > for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a blind > person attending. > > Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. > Unfortunately > this > is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly because > the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would exceed > over > $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their corporate > ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to create a > studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, > wanted > to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I truly wish you > well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you require > further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once again, > thank you for your interest in CSMB. > > Regards > > Jacquie Hammond > President/CSMB > > Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able > to, > as > far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, and > they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a > simple > matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has anyone got any > clues? > thanks > Brandon Hicks > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: callto://reyuth > msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists > we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
By going to for-the-people.com! - Original Message - From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 1:24 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > That sounds like an interesting tutorial. Where can you get it? > > HF > - Original Message - > From: "dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > > >>i get exilent braudcast quality with goldwave and find it to be just fine >> for working quickly. for example in an hours time i have done 30 imagers >> with sound efects and a few open and closers for football and baseball >> braudcasts for the espn radio station that i work for. there is a >> totorial >> at for the people in 10 parts that if you get it you will know the ins >> and >> outs of goldwave and be using it very fast in no time. he uses jaws and >> no >> scrips are needed.that really sold me on it. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >> >> >>>I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program >>>is >>> awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge >>> >>> I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How much : finer do you want than that? : : Bruce : : -- : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV : : Bruce Toews : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com : : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: : : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise or : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any price. : > : > - Original Message - : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have to : >> take : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! What : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what you : >> can : >> afford! : >> - Original Message - : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : >> : >> : >>> HI, : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. : >>> : >>> Best regards : >>> Brian : >>> - Original Message - : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : >>> : >>> : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder from APH : is : also quite a program! : - Original Message - : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : : : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide what : > they : > really need to do, and after all that then make the decision on
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
Hi Ron They don't move at all for me. They stay in the same place. I could move the start markerwithout a problem, but not the end marker. HF - Original Message - From: "Ron Winstanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > Hello > I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, but > holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right > cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key > will place the marker at the current position in the file. > Ron > - Original Message - > From: HF > To: PC audio discussion list. > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM > Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker > > > Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can > though, move the start marker without a problem. > Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? > > HF > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Re[2]: txt2mp3
Hi all, My finger is feeling a bit better now! I wonder if someone can help wit bibbose don't know if I have spelled it correct or not. I amtrying to see if the program will split a big mp3 file up rather than just make a huge file their is 4 choices but I don't quite know what I'm doing. If someone who has the program can take a look it's under the tools menu and mp3 you can select the beginning of the document I done it and you only get the title of the book I thank you in advance for any help anyone can give. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
Hi, use control + left shift keys with the left and right cursor keys to move the finish marker. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:39 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker Hi Ron They don't move at all for me. They stay in the same place. I could move the start markerwithout a problem, but not the end marker. HF - Original Message - From: "Ron Winstanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:40 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > Hello > I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, but > holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right > cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key > will place the marker at the current position in the file. > Ron > - Original Message - > From: HF > To: PC audio discussion list. > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM > Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker > > > Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can > though, move the start marker without a problem. > Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? > > HF > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
I do, but they don't move. HF - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > Hi, > > use control + left shift keys with the left and right cursor keys to move > the finish marker. > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:39 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > > > Hi Ron > They don't move at all for me. They stay in the same place. I could move > the > start markerwithout a problem, but not the end marker. > > HF > - Original Message - > From: "Ron Winstanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > > >> Hello >> I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, >> but >> holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right >> cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key >> will place the marker at the current position in the file. >> Ron >> - Original Message - >> From: HF >> To: PC audio discussion list. >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM >> Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker >> >> >> Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can >> though, move the start marker without a problem. >> Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? >> >> HF >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Jonathan: I'm sure that many of us would appreciate if you would do a comparison between both editors. You're certainly guifted in that way. Cheers. - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:14 PM Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for > anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just > as > there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also > benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I > personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found > the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound > Forge > without scripts. > > I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both > programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the > differences. > > The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. > > http://www.the-minx.com > Jonathan Mosen > Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com > Ph: +1-925-566-9265. > Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave can't move finish marker
Well are you in a open file? There isn't any reason it wouldn't work really. Rick === Contact Information: Skype ID: rharmon928 MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 330-724-6093 Location: Akron, Ohio USA Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org blind_geek_zone "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of seeing people towards them." - Helen Keller, 1925 - Original Message - From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 5:18 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker I do, but they don't move. HF - Original Message - From: "Rick Harmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:45 PM Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > Hi, > > use control + left shift keys with the left and right cursor keys to move > the finish marker. > > Rick > > > === > > Contact Information: > > Skype ID: rharmon928 > MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone: 330-724-6093 > Location: Akron, Ohio USA > > Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org > > blind_geek_zone > > > "The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of > seeing people towards them." > - Helen Keller, 1925 > > > > - Original Message - > From: "HF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:39 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > > > Hi Ron > They don't move at all for me. They stay in the same place. I could move > the > start markerwithout a problem, but not the end marker. > > HF > - Original Message - > From: "Ron Winstanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: gold wave can't move finish marker > > >> Hello >> I'm not sure of the difference between end markers and finish markers, >> but >> holding down left shift and left control while pressing the left or right >> cursor keys will move the marker accordingly. Also, the right bracket key >> will place the marker at the current position in the file. >> Ron >> - Original Message - >> From: HF >> To: PC audio discussion list. >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:55 PM >> Subject: gold wave can't move finish marker >> >> >> Any ideas, I cannot move the finish marker in either direction. I can >> though, move the start marker without a problem. >> Is there a setting that I should be awhere of? >> >> HF >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Would someone check this link for me?
Would someone please go to my Media web page: http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/media.shtml, find the link for Cape Talk 567 (the link for the Windows Media stream, not the home page), and test it, for me? Whenever I enter the associated URL directly into either WMP or Realplayer, it works fine. But, whenever I click on the link on my web page, whichever player I have associated with .asx files (either WMP or Realplayer) reports that the stream cannot be found. I'd like to know if others have the same problem when clicking on the link on my web page, or if the problem may be something peculiar to my system. Thanks. Blessed Be, Dana that's Dayna, D A N A, NOT Donna, D O N N A D. S. Leslie, née C. R. Guttman Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: dsleslie Web: ÞE OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE Your Source for Discounted Ideas http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/ ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
Hi Bob, What screen were you using with that automation system? Was the system fully accessible? Dave Marthouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:23 AM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > I have only used Dallett, and that was simply a matter of blocking your edit > and hitting the delete key, and that portion of the sound bite was gone. > With Dallett you are given the option to reinsert the portion of the clip > that was deleted. > - Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > > > Oh, I thought that was the broadcast automation where you'd import the wav > > files or whatever from another editor into. I think the best interface is > > probably Studio Recorder from APH because it has the sound forge feel to > > it > > with the brackets doing selecting and the ability to scrub ahead and such. > > It really doesn't take much to take out something and have it sound like > > it > > was never there. The thing that it does that Goldwave doesn't, at least > > from > > what I gather, is to give me a goto time function that I can just type in > > "+3:00" or whatever to go 3 minutes ahead or whatever I need to find the > > next place to delete or end the deletion or whatever. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:03 PM > > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > > > > >> Blind people, in my view can play a tremendous role behind the scenes if > >> only given the chance. In mhy case I was labeled as one of the best audio > >> editors in the business. Keep in mind that in those days we had nothing > >> more > >> to work with than a greese pencil, audio tape and splicing tape. Today > >> working with any of the editing programs is a breeze. With the best of > >> physical editing we could never achieve the accuracy that electronic > >> editing > >> brings to this new age of technology. I have yet to play with some of > >> these > >> programs. My experience has only been with a program caalled Dallett. > >> Wit Dallett you can do just about anything that you can do with sound > >> forge > >> and gold wave. You don't want to go out and buy Dallett unless you have > >> very > >> deep pockets, and I mean deep pockets. . > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " > >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:39 PM > >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question > >> > >> > >>> You are so correct. I have a friend at our local adult sstation who > >>> tells > >>> me > >>> when he has a shift, he goes in to the control room and has two buttons. > >>> One > >>> is the mic, and the other is marked "Next Event!" All of his scripts are > >>> on > >>> the screne as is his log, playlist, show, you name it. Not many stations > >>> use > >>> CD's anymore, and get their music from a music service or download a > >>> packagge from somewhere. > >>> > >>> There are some blind people doing operations work and behind the scene > >>> stuff, but I don't know of many on the air. I would like to hear from > >>> anybody using Audiovolt, and other stuff. I've used Enco on a limmited > >>> bassis, and it does work with Window-eyes right out of the box as do > >>> many > >>> many things, including Sound Forge although the sets do help. > >>> > >>> Chuck > >>> > >>> > >>> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " > >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:09 PM > >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question > >>> > >>> > It is my understanding that the 1500 songs that most stations have on > their > rotating play list are downloaded from special websites that are set up > by > the record companies and are simply inserted into the daily play list, > thus > eliminating this particular function. At one time I was a music > librarian > for a Canadian public broadcaster. It was my job to order and catalogue > all > of the music into a national database with a number of different > information > fields to be filled in by the person doing the cataloguing. Back then > we > had physical compact discs that we could actually hold in our hands. > Today > all of that music is on a hard drive. If you are an oldies station > there > are > companies that will actually send you a physical hard drive that is > preloaded with any type of music that you desire. The drive costs > about > 200-dollars. This is far less than actually going out to buy all of > that > music. In most stations that I have visited in the past year or so, you > would be ha
RE: gold wave vs sound forge
Jonathan: Don't you find it easier to engage scrubbing when editing, especialy, on tight deadlines? I find that without scrubbing it is far more difficult to guage the distance I move or how much of the material I want to select. Just as sighted folks look at the waveform, I feel scrubbing gives us an equal ability to move through sound quickly and smoothly. Can you engage scrubbing without the scripts? Thanks. Should I upgrade to version 8? At work we have to use version 6 in the newsroom and--yes--version 4.5 in our news studio. Don't ask me why we haven't upgraded! I have version 7 here at home. --Daveed--At 12:14 PM 5/26/2006, you wrote: >Hi all, just in case this thread has created any false impression for >anyone, Sound Forge is not dependent on screen reader configuration. Just as >there are benefits in running the scripts for Goldwave, there are also >benefits in running the scripts or set files for Sound Forge. However I >personally choose not to use them as for me, speed is the key, and I found >the scripts slow things down a little. So you can certainly use Sound Forge >without scripts. > >I agree with the side by side comparison idea. I've used and learned both >programs, so may well give that a go at some point to illustrate the >differences. > >The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs. > >http://www.the-minx.com >Jonathan Mosen >Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com >Ph: +1-925-566-9265. >Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671 > > >___ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we >offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. >Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 5/26/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 5/26/2006 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
Dallett is a windows based system. I was using a large screen and not a scraen reader. - Original Message - From: "Dave Marthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:01 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > Hi Bob, > > What screen were you using with that automation system? Was the system > fully accessible? > > > Dave Marthouse > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:23 AM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> I have only used Dallett, and that was simply a matter of blocking your > edit >> and hitting the delete key, and that portion of the sound bite was gone. >> With Dallett you are given the option to reinsert the portion of the clip >> that was deleted. >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> > Oh, I thought that was the broadcast automation where you'd import the > wav >> > files or whatever from another editor into. I think the best interface > is >> > probably Studio Recorder from APH because it has the sound forge feel >> > to >> > it >> > with the brackets doing selecting and the ability to scrub ahead and > such. >> > It really doesn't take much to take out something and have it sound >> > like >> > it >> > was never there. The thing that it does that Goldwave doesn't, at least >> > from >> > what I gather, is to give me a goto time function that I can just type > in >> > "+3:00" or whatever to go 3 minutes ahead or whatever I need to find >> > the >> > next place to delete or end the deletion or whatever. >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:03 PM >> > Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> > >> > >> >> Blind people, in my view can play a tremendous role behind the scenes > if >> >> only given the chance. In mhy case I was labeled as one of the best > audio >> >> editors in the business. Keep in mind that in those days we had >> >> nothing >> >> more >> >> to work with than a greese pencil, audio tape and splicing tape. Today >> >> working with any of the editing programs is a breeze. With the best of >> >> physical editing we could never achieve the accuracy that electronic >> >> editing >> >> brings to this new age of technology. I have yet to play with some of >> >> these >> >> programs. My experience has only been with a program caalled Dallett. >> >> Wit Dallett you can do just about anything that you can do with sound >> >> forge >> >> and gold wave. You don't want to go out and buy Dallett unless you >> >> have >> >> very >> >> deep pockets, and I mean deep pockets. . >> >> - Original Message - >> >> From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:39 PM >> >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >> >> >> >>> You are so correct. I have a friend at our local adult sstation who >> >>> tells >> >>> me >> >>> when he has a shift, he goes in to the control room and has two > buttons. >> >>> One >> >>> is the mic, and the other is marked "Next Event!" All of his scripts > are >> >>> on >> >>> the screne as is his log, playlist, show, you name it. Not many > stations >> >>> use >> >>> CD's anymore, and get their music from a music service or download a >> >>> packagge from somewhere. >> >>> >> >>> There are some blind people doing operations work and behind the >> >>> scene >> >>> stuff, but I don't know of many on the air. I would like to hear from >> >>> anybody using Audiovolt, and other stuff. I've used Enco on a >> >>> limmited >> >>> bassis, and it does work with Window-eyes right out of the box as do >> >>> many >> >>> many things, including Sound Forge although the sets do help. >> >>> >> >>> Chuck >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> - Original Message - >> >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:09 PM >> >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >>> >> >>> >> It is my understanding that the 1500 songs that most stations have >> on >> their >> rotating play list are downloaded from special websites that are set > up >> by >> the record companies and are simply inserted into the daily play > list, >> thus >> eliminating this particular function. At one time I was a music >> librarian >> for a Canadian public broadcaster. It was my job to order and > catalogue >> all >> of the music into a national database with a number of different >> information >> fields to be filled in by the person doing the cataloguing. Back >> then >> we >> had physical compact discs that we could
Fw: [Blind Audio] Pocket dab-radio.
Hello! Anybody here who knows a good pocket dab radio? I cant seem to find one while searching on the internet. /Anders. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] SPONSORED LINKS Multimedia Multimedia course Multimedia design Multimedia presentation Multimedia program Multimedia schools YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS a.. Visit your group "blindaudio" on the web. b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Winamp Version 5.22 is Available
This version of Winamp has a lot of great new features! - Original Message - From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "GUI Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Access-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PC Audio" Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:50 PM Subject: Winamp Version 5.22 is Available > Winamp version 5.22 is now available and one place where you can > download it from is at > www.majorgeeks.com/Winamp_5_Full_d2490.html. Here are the changes in > this version: > > New: loading of additional playlist formats: ASX/WAX/WMX/WVX, WPL, B4S > New: [gen_ff] modern skin unicode support > New: [in_wm] burning of DRM protected files (if allowed by content > provider) > New: [ml_pmp] transfer of playlists to portable devices > Improved: More informative CD burning status window > Improved: [gen_ff] modern skinning engine speed optimizations > Improved: [gen_jumpex] jump-to-file search response > Improved: [gen_tray] enhanced icon pack support plus more... (thanks DrO) > Improved: [in_wm] seeking improvements > Improved: [in_wm] gapless WMA support > Improved: [ml_nowplaying] Redesigned 'Now Playing' media library view > Improved: [pmp_ipod] Loading times for iPods reduced > Fixed: Winamp won't restore after being minimized with a dialog box open > Fixed: $abbr() title formatting lockup > Fixed: Add Folder adds tracks BEFORE the last track > Fixed: Clicking 'Next' in Fullscreen video OSD acts like clicking it twice > Fixed: Rating in pledit right-click context menu always shows "No Rating" > Fixed: Stop with fadeout (Shift+V) just stops playback, no fadeout > Fixed: CD burning bugs and crashes > Fixed: Delete key not working in Online Services or SC Wire search > Fixed: [gen_jumpex] handling of playlist with more than 65,536 files > Fixed: [gen_jumpex] 'on end of queue' fixed > Fixed: [gen_jumpex] modern skin pledit docked toolbar mode not remembered > Fixed: [gen_jumpex] ML size/position not remembered when switching > from Classic to > Modern and back to Classic skin > Fixed: [gen_jumpex] misc bug fixes > Fixed: [gen_ml] playlists root view slowness bug > Fixed: [gen_ml] Modern skin: Media Library > View (menu) > Devices > Fixed: [in_midi] corrupt header crash > Fixed: [in_mp4] metadata writing crash > Fixed: [in_mp4] seek bug when using right arrow key > Fixed: [in_mp3] MPEG-2 and MPEG-2.5 Layer 3 playback crash > Fixed: [in_mp3] Winamp crashes when trying to play any wrongly named .aac > file > Fixed: [in_wave] WAV burning fix > Fixed: [in_wave] Locking files (wav's can't be renamed/deleted) > Fixed: [in_wm] lockup on wma with expired/unrenewable drm license > Fixed: [in_wm] out of sync audio/video on some WMV streams > Fixed: [in_vorbis] fullpath shown in playlist for tagless files with > atf disabled > Fixed: [ml_pmp] Duplicates being synchronized > Fixed: [ml_pmp] Several crashes during transfers > Fixed: [out_ds] Can't select different Output Device with two active > instances of > out_ds > Fixed: [out_ds] incorrect enumeration of stereo outputs for two of > same pro soundcard > > > Regards Steve > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: steve1963 > MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers these days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that more people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the world! - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station including > the > building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of > broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive equipment nor > are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for > workplace > accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast > environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly > workplace > to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with > several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make sure > that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could be > anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news feeds, > station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading of > news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what radio > is > all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and talk > to > the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right > business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not for > profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers will > often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of these > small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer > equipment > and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input control > board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette players. > This > in my opinion is a foot in the door as they say. An online radio station > or > signing up to perform in announcing function or host on ACB radio is yet > another option that should seriously be considered. The downside of the > broadcast industry is that most radio stations are automated and > unfortunately do not require staffing levels that we experienced five to > ten > years ago. The bottom line here is that you are going to have to do your > homework and figure out what exactly your strong points are and work on > them. Do you feel that you would make a good announcer/host? Do you feel > that you have the skills to write a intelligent news story and do all of > the > research behind the story that you are researching? Are you capable of > writing copy for commercials? How about your production skills. Do you > have > the production skills to do electronic editing on the fly? The broadcast > industry is very demanding and expects most of us that have worked in the > industry to be multitaskers. Personally I have worked in the industry for > over thirty years and got out of the business just about the time that > computers and radio automation took over. > > > > > Original Message - > From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:00 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> Wow! $500,000 would buy an aweful lot of equipment. I know of no studio >> worth that much in equipment alone unless one was talking about buying an >> actual building. >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:31 PM >> Subject: broadcasting question >> >> >>> hi list, >>> I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are people >>> out >>> there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a >>> course >>> for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a >>> blind >>> person attending. >>> >>> Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. Unfortunately >>> this >>> is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly >>> because >>> the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would exceed >>> over >>> $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their >>> corporate >>> ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to create >>> a >>> studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, >>> wanted >>> to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I truly wish >>> you >>> well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you >>> require >>> further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once >>> again, >>> thank you for your interest in CSMB. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Jacquie Hammond >>> President/CSMB >>> >>> Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able to, >>> as >>> far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, >>> and >>> they
RE: Would someone check this link for me?
Hello, I hope this is not a repeat of some one else's findings. I didn't find any further messages in the Outlook conversation but by this time you may have already found the answer to your question. I located the link and the stream plays just fine. I saw the homepage and figured I'd better keep looking since you had had problems. I did not look for a real player stream so am wondering if you only have the Media Player url now. In any case, the station is very busily and smoothly playing. Btw, I'm going to save this message with the url. There are a lot of intresting sites. I am wondering whether the WCBSstreams are still active. Last I heard CBS had gone sports and I thought they had changed format. Hope this helps you with your troubleshooting. Pam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana S. Leslie Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:49 PM To: BlindTech; PC-Audio Subject: Would someone check this link for me? Would someone please go to my Media web page: http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/media.shtml, find the link for Cape Talk 567 (the link for the Windows Media stream, not the home page), and test it, for me? Whenever I enter the associated URL directly into either WMP or Realplayer, it works fine. But, whenever I click on the link on my web page, whichever player I have associated with .asx files (either WMP or Realplayer) reports that the stream cannot be found. I'd like to know if others have the same problem when clicking on the link on my web page, or if the problem may be something peculiar to my system. Thanks. Blessed Be, Dana that's Dayna, D A N A, NOT Donna, D O N N A D. S. Leslie, née C. R. Guttman Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: dsleslie Web: ÞE OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE Your Source for Discounted Ideas http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/ ___ PC-Audio Lis ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order to save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that bought the rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs indefinitely. Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make good radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has to be a human element to overlook things. . I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station licence is like having a licence to print money." - Original Message - From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers these > days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that more > people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the world! > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station including >> the >> building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of >> broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive equipment >> nor >> are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for >> workplace >> accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast >> environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly >> workplace >> to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with >> several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make sure >> that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could be >> anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news feeds, >> station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading of >> news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what radio >> is >> all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and talk >> to >> the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right >> business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not for >> profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers will >> often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of these >> small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer >> equipment >> and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input control >> board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette players. >> This >> in my opinion is a foot in the door as they say. An online radio station >> or >> signing up to perform in announcing function or host on ACB radio is yet >> another option that should seriously be considered. The downside of the >> broadcast industry is that most radio stations are automated and >> unfortunately do not require staffing levels that we experienced five to >> ten >> years ago. The bottom line here is that you are going to have to do your >> homework and figure out what exactly your strong points are and work on >> them. Do you feel that you would make a good announcer/host? Do you feel >> that you have the skills to write a intelligent news story and do all of >> the >> research behind the story that you are researching? Are you capable of >> writing copy for commercials? How about your production skills. Do you >> have >> the production skills to do electronic editing on the fly? The broadcast >> industry is very demanding and expects most of us that have worked in the >> industry to be multitask. Personally I have worked in the industry for >> over thirty years and got out of the business just about the time that >> computers and radio automation took over. >> >> >> >> >> Original Message - >> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:00 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> Wow! $500,000 would buy an awful lot of equipment. I know of no studio >>> worth that much in equipment alone unless one was talking about buying >>> an >>> actual building. >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:31 PM >>> Subject: broadcasting question >>> >>> hi list, I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are people out there who have done it, so I emailed a local school that teaches a course for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when I asked about a blind person attending. Hi Brandon, sor
Re: Would someone check this link for me?
Pam, Several others, from the blindtech list, have also reported no problem with the link on my Media page. Apparently, it's something peculiar in my system that is preventing me from using that link, and only that link. I certainly don't understand it. BTW, I don't know what gave you the idea that WCBS-AM had gone all sports. It's been all-news for over 30/35 years now. Thanks. Dana - Original Message - From: "Pam Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 8:09 PM Subject: RE: Would someone check this link for me? Hello, I hope this is not a repeat of some one else's findings. I didn't find any further messages in the Outlook conversation but by this time you may have already found the answer to your question. I located the link and the stream plays just fine. I saw the homepage and figured I'd better keep looking since you had had problems. I did not look for a real player stream so am wondering if you only have the Media Player url now. In any case, the station is very busily and smoothly playing. Btw, I'm going to save this message with the url. There are a lot of intresting sites. I am wondering whether the WCBSstreams are still active. Last I heard CBS had gone sports and I thought they had changed format. Hope this helps you with your troubleshooting. Pam -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana S. Leslie Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:49 PM To: BlindTech; PC-Audio Subject: Would someone check this link for me? Would someone please go to my Media web page: http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/media.shtml, find the link for Cape Talk 567 (the link for the Windows Media stream, not the home page), and test it, for me? Whenever I enter the associated URL directly into either WMP or Realplayer, it works fine. But, whenever I click on the link on my web page, whichever player I have associated with .asx files (either WMP or Realplayer) reports that the stream cannot be found. I'd like to know if others have the same problem when clicking on the link on my web page, or if the problem may be something peculiar to my system. Thanks. Blessed Be, Dana that's Dayna, D A N A, NOT Donna, D O N N A D. S. Leslie, née C. R. Guttman Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: dsleslie Web: ÞE OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE Your Source for Discounted Ideas http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/ ___ PC-Audio Lis ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Loss during file splitting
When file splitting after a period of time eg. an hour, Total Recorder and Replay A/V perform differently. TR splits even on syllable and loses nothing. Replay A/V seems to loose about 12 seconds of data. Does anyone know how this loss can be prevented with Replay A/V? Stephen Jolley ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Would someone check this link for me?
Hi Donna. The stream works just fine. Dan Kerstetter - Original Message - From: "Dana S. Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "BlindTech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "PC-Audio" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 5:48 PM Subject: Would someone check this link for me? > Would someone please go to my Media web page: > http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/media.shtml, > find the link for Cape Talk 567 (the link for the Windows Media stream, > not > the home page), and test it, for me? Whenever I enter the associated URL > directly into either WMP or Realplayer, it works fine. But, whenever I > click > on the link on my web page, whichever player I have associated with .asx > files (either WMP or Realplayer) reports that the stream cannot be found. > I'd like to know if others have the same problem when clicking on the link > on my web page, or if the problem may be something peculiar to my system. > > Thanks. > > Blessed Be, > > Dana > that's Dayna, D A N A, NOT Donna, D O N N A > > D. S. Leslie, née C. R. Guttman > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Skype: dsleslie > Web: ÞE OL' PHILOSOPHIE SHOPPE > Your Source for Discounted Ideas > http://members.cox.net/dsleslie2/ > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 5/26/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 5/26/2006 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Replay AV Stopping recording
I cannot seem to stop a recoding which I have set up. I have told it to capture by downloading, and told it to record immediately. Now I want to stop it. When I go to the list of shows, it definitely shows it is capturing. The manual says. Here's how to start recording a scheduled show immediately: List of 4 items 1. Right click the show to record. 2. Click Start Record/Download from the pop-up menu. 3. When you want to stop recording, right click the show again, and click Stop Record/Download from the pop-up menu. 4. Answer Yes when you are asked "Would you like to save the current recording?" I do not get step 4. I am just put into the show properties area. Help appreciated. P. ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: broadcasting question
Well, I think they are required to be auto for a certain period, then they have DJ's. I know Kjac is one station of the Jac format that has jocks on. When I first tried listening to it though, it was all music. - Original Message - From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:17 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question >I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated > completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order to > save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become > popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that bought > the > rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio > automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs indefinitely. > Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make > good > radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has to > be > a human element to overlook things. . > I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station > licence > is like having a licence to print money." > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >> But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers >> these >> days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that more >> people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the world! >> - Original Message - >> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station including >>> the >>> building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of >>> broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive equipment >>> nor >>> are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for >>> workplace >>> accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast >>> environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly >>> workplace >>> to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with >>> several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make sure >>> that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could be >>> anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news feeds, >>> station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading of >>> news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what radio >>> is >>> all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and talk >>> to >>> the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right >>> business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not for >>> profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers >>> will >>> often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of these >>> small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer >>> equipment >>> and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input >>> control >>> board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette players. >>> This >>> in my opinion is a foot in the door as they say. An online radio station >>> or >>> signing up to perform in announcing function or host on ACB radio is yet >>> another option that should seriously be considered. The downside of the >>> broadcast industry is that most radio stations are automated and >>> unfortunately do not require staffing levels that we experienced five to >>> ten >>> years ago. The bottom line here is that you are going to have to do your >>> homework and figure out what exactly your strong points are and work on >>> them. Do you feel that you would make a good announcer/host? Do you feel >>> that you have the skills to write a intelligent news story and do all of >>> the >>> research behind the story that you are researching? Are you capable of >>> writing copy for commercials? How about your production skills. Do you >>> have >>> the production skills to do electronic editing on the fly? The broadcast >>> industry is very demanding and expects most of us that have worked in >>> the >>> industry to be multitask. Personally I have worked in the industry for >>> over thirty years and got out of the business just about the time that >>> computers and radio automation took over. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Original Message - >>> From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:00 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> Wow! $500,000 would buy an awful lot of equipment. I know of no studio worth that much in equipment alone unless one was talking about buying an actual building.
Re: broadcasting question
It is possible that they may have some live programming in prime time, but I would venture to say that in off hours it is 100% automation. When it is raining cats and dogs and the announcer says that it is bright and sunny you know damn well that the station is on automatic pilot. Not good programming as far as I am concerned. besides I probably have more songs on my ipod than most stations have on their play list. - Original Message - From: "Brent Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:48 PM Subject: Re: broadcasting question > Well, I think they are required to be auto for a certain period, then they > have DJ's. I know Kjac is one station of the Jac format that has jocks on. > When I first tried listening to it though, it was all music. > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:17 PM > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > >>I personally know of a number of stations in Canada that are operated >> completely by one person. Most of the work is contracted out in order to >> save money. Take for an example the Jack format. The format has become >> popular in both the United States and Canada. The stations that bought >> the >> rights to the format cleaned house, and rely completely on Jack radio >> automation 24/7. Just load the computer and the program runs >> indefinitely. >> Why hire people when Jack can do the job. This of course does not make >> good >> radio, but try to convince the owners of such stations that there has to >> be >> a human element to overlook things. . >> I think that it was Lord Thompson that said "Owning a radio station >> licence >> is like having a licence to print money." >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 7:45 PM >> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >> >> >>> But it seems that if radio stations are relying heavily on computers >>> these >>> days, that they should be able to use accessible equipment so that more >>> people can take advantage of a dream to get on the radio for the world! >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Bob Seed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:33 PM >>> Subject: Re: broadcasting question >>> >>> That amount of money could easily buy an entire radio station including the building that it is housed in. Unfortunately the vast majority of broadcasters are not willing to pay for the cost of adaptive equipment nor are they willing to modify their equipment in order to provide for workplace accommodation. With the introduction of computers into the broadcast environment the industry has changed from a hands on user friendly workplace to one that in today's world looks more like a television studio with several monitors that have to be viewed constantly in order to make sure that all operating functions are carried out flawlessly. This could be anything from: the regular play list, transmitter functions, news feeds, station traffic and scheduling, and in many small markets the reading of news and commercials. If you really want to get a taste as to what radio is all about I would suggest visiting a radio station in your area and talk to the staff, and from there you will get a feeling if this is the right business for you to be getting into. Another idea is to find a not for profit community radio station that is run by volunteers. Volunteers will often take the time to show you the ropes of the industry. many of these small stations are hands on operations without a lot of computer equipment and software programs. In most cases there is a small eight input control board with a telephone hybrid and a couple of CD and cassette players. This in my opinion is a foot in the door as they say. An online radio station or signing up to perform in announcing function or host on ACB radio is yet another option that should seriously be considered. The downside of the broadcast industry is that most radio stations are automated and unfortunately do not require staffing levels that we experienced five to ten years ago. The bottom line here is that you are going to have to do your homework and figure out what exactly your strong points are and work on them. Do you feel that you would make a good announcer/host? Do you feel that you have the skills to write a intelligent news story and do all of the research behind the story that you are researching? Are you capable of writing copy for commercials? How about your production skills. Do you have
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Maybe a better way of saying it is to say that in my opinion I do not feel that I can get as polished a finished product with Goldwave as I can with SoundForge without a lot more work, and a whole lot less flexability. And, the Goldwave noise reduction that is built-in is no place as good as the noise reduction in SoundForge. - Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge :I think you can get good broadcast quality from goldwave, but the program is : awkward to work with when you are in a hurry. : : - Original Message - : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : To: "PC audio discussion list. " : Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:07 AM : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : : : >I guess I wouldn't be as concerned about how small a piece as I am things : >like the equalizer, noise reduction, click and crackle features, : >compression, and mixing choices. But, that doesn't mean that my needs are : >the same as everybody else on this list. So, at the very least a person : >should be compairing Goldwave to at least one other sound editor in a price : >range that they can afford. And, I would be willing to bet that Goldwave : >will be fine for 80 percent or more of persons who are not concerned with : >getting broadcast quality for every file they edit. : > : > : > : > - Original Message - : > From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:59 PM : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : > : With GW you can edit to within a thousandth of a second or finer. How : > much : > : finer do you want than that? : > : : > : Bruce : > : : > : -- : > : Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he : > : gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV : > : : > : Bruce Toews : > : E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > : Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net : > : Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net : > : Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com : > : : > : On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gary Schindler wrote: : > : : > : > the only thing I wish that goldwave could do is to be a more precise : > or : > : > finer editor. you can't beat soundforges editing capabilities at any : > price. : > : > : > : > - Original Message - : > : > From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:29 AM : > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : > : > : > : >> Some people say, "You get what you pay for!" But actually, you have : > to : > : >> take : > : >> a lot of things into consideration when purchasing a sound editor! : > What : > : >> features and abilities you want with a sound editor, and also, what : > you : > : >> can : > : >> afford! : > : >> - Original Message - : > : >> From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : >> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : >> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:42 PM : > : >> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : >> : > : >> : > : >>> HI, : > : >>> But it's also pretty expensive. : > : >>> : > : >>> Best regards : > : >>> Brian : > : >>> - Original Message - : > : >>> From: "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : >>> To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:38 PM : > : >>> Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : >>> : > : >>> : > : I think that from what I've heard so far, that Studio Recorder from : > APH : > : is : > : also quite a program! : > : - Original Message - : > : From: "David Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:59 AM : > : Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : : > : : > : > I think that the individual needs to take a look at each, decide : > what : > : > they : > : > really need to do, and after all that then make the decision on : > how much : > : > they are willing to pay to get the editor that will do what they : > need to : > : > do. I really like SoundForge, but I do a lot of audio for radio : > : > programs, : > : > etc. The person simply wanting to get records to MP3 and clean : > the : > : > files : > : > up to make them sound good may decide that they don't need all the : > : > features : > : > of Soundforge, and that they can good enough quality with Goldwave : > or : > : > Audasity or something else. : > : > : > : > : > : > : > : > - Original Message - : > : > From: "Chuck Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : > To: "PC audio discussion list. " : > : > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:06 AM : > : > Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge : > : > : > : >>
Re: broadcasting question
Are you in a small market and where would one go to find the jobs in a smaller mark, if that is where you are? If you are in a market of 30, or higher please let me know. - Original Message - From: "Jed Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:05 PM Subject: RE: broadcasting question > Brandon, > That's bunch of crap. > I'm totally blind and have been in the industry for 15 years. > They have a lot of growing up to do > Hit me back, and we can talk about it. > > -Original Message- > From: Gary Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:00 PM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > > This doesn't sound like they were maybe being totally fair with you! > - Original Message - > From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM > Subject: broadcasting question > > >> hi list, >> I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are >> people >> out >> there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a > course >> for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a > blind >> person attending. >> >> Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. >> Unfortunately >> this >> is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly > because >> the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would > exceed >> over >> $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their > corporate >> ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to > create a >> studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, >> wanted >> to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I truly wish > you >> well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you > require >> further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once > again, >> thank you for your interest in CSMB. >> >> Regards >> >> Jacquie Hammond >> President/CSMB >> >> Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able >> to, >> as >> far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, > and >> they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a >> simple >> matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has anyone got > any >> clues? >> thanks >> Brandon Hicks >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Skype: callto://reyuth >> msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists >> we >> offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
RE: broadcasting question
I'm in the Providence market, which is like 35. -Original Message- From: Johnnie J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2006 2:21 AM To: PC audio discussion list. Subject: Re: broadcasting question Are you in a small market and where would one go to find the jobs in a smaller mark, if that is where you are? If you are in a market of 30, or higher please let me know. - Original Message - From: "Jed Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'PC audio discussion list. '" Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:05 PM Subject: RE: broadcasting question > Brandon, > That's bunch of crap. > I'm totally blind and have been in the industry for 15 years. They > have a lot of growing up to do Hit me back, and we can talk about it. > > -Original Message- > From: Gary Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:00 PM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: Re: broadcasting question > > > This doesn't sound like they were maybe being totally fair with you! > - Original Message - > From: "Brandon Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PC audio discussion list. " > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:31 PM > Subject: broadcasting question > > >> hi list, >> I'm interested in going into radio broadcasting. I know there are >> people out >> there who have done it, so i emailed a local school that teaches a > course >> for broadcasting. here is the reply I received when i asked about a > blind >> person attending. >> >> Hi Brandon, sorry about the delay in getting back to you. >> Unfortunately this >> is not a program that is suitable to the visually impaired. Mainly > because >> the cost of accomodating the expense of required equipment would > exceed >> over >> $500,000.00. Not only the expense, but radio stations and their > corporate >> ownership will never incur such an expense, nor is it feasible to > create a >> studio suitable for this. I understand your disappointment, however, >> wanted to be very honest with you regarding the reality of this. I >> truly wish > you >> well in all of your future endeavors and if there is anything you > require >> further information on, please feel free to email or call me. Once > again, >> thank you for your interest in CSMB. >> >> Regards >> >> Jacquie Hammond >> President/CSMB >> >> Now what is this 500 thousand dollar cost all about? I would be able >> to, as >> far as I know and I did visit a radio studio to use the mixing boards, > and >> they use windows software for the playlist editing, so it would be a >> simple matter of creating scripts. I'm quite curious to see, has >> anyone got > any >> clues? >> thanks >> Brandon Hicks >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Skype: callto://reyuth >> msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> ___ >> PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >> http://www.pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists >> we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com >> > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Replay AV Stopping recording
Again, the trick to stopping a recording is to hit the context menu key and then hit the appropriate letter. I can't remember offhand if the letter to hit is s or p, but you don't want to hit enter as if you were in a fully accessible program! Once you do it this way, you will get the dialog asking if you want to save the recording. Dean ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: gold wave vs sound forge
Ane maybe if Studio Recorder had the effects that Soundforge has, with all the accessibility, maybe people might move to Studio Recorder! - Original Message - From: "Jim Noseworthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 10:39 AM Subject: Re: gold wave vs sound forge > Hi Folks: > > Well! This has indeed been an interesting thread. Perhaps it would be a > good idea if someone, who is well versed in sound editing, could give a > side-bi-side comparison, emphasizing the strengths similarities, and > weaknesses of both editors. This is especially important for those who > have > not yet formed a bias to one or the other programs. In otherwards, let's > get > the facts. I would also recommend that the work be accomplished without > the > use of script or set files as this would most certainly affect the > outcome. > SF has had a lot of work done on Scripts over the years: both free and > comercial scripts. Now it may be, that one or the other programs is better > suited for scripting or creating set files. This too is a very important > item for consideration and certainly may be a factor in determining which > editor one should purchase. It is, however, important to distinguish > between > the off-the-shelf capabilities of the editor it self as apposed to the > addition of Script or Set files. > > Thanks all over the place for listening. > > > ___ > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com > ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
Re: Replay AV Stopping recording
OK, I had to crash out and loose the recording, but it wasn't crucial. I'll experiment and see how it goes. I hope these Replay AV people are receptive to some accessability improvements. P. At 03:45 PM 27/05/2006, you wrote: >Again, the trick to stopping a recording is to hit the context menu >key and then hit the appropriate letter. I can't remember offhand if >the letter to hit is s or p, but you don't want to hit enter as if >you were in a fully accessible program! Once you do it this way, you >will get the dialog asking if you want to save the recording. > >Dean > > >___ >PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... >http://www.pc-audio.org > >To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other >lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
