Re: Can't run GUB 2.9.4 on linux
Joe Neeman schreef: I'm trying to install the GUB 2.9.4-1 on gentoo linux (amd64, but with a bunch of x86 compatibility libs). I get $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/lib/ /home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/bin/lilypond /home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.1' not found (required by /home/joe/oldlilypond/usr/bin/lilypond) So it seems 2.8.1 is linked statically with libstdc++ and 2.9.4 isn't. Is this intentional? No, there was a packaging error with GCC that slipped through in the installer. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ps changes betweeen 2.7.29 and 2.8.2 broke tabloid booklet
I produce tabloid booklets of my music (fold tabloid sheet in half to get letter-sized pages). The method I use to produce them currently does not work; it worked in 2.7.29. I'm not certain if any ps changes went into 2.9 but not 2.8.2. 1) use lilypond-book to produce normal ps and pdf. (well, normal-looking; I know little about under-the-hood ps stuff) 2) run this: psbook $1.ps | psnup -2 -ptabloid -Pletter | ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=11x17 - tab-$1.pdf With 2.8.2, the final ps2pdf fails. Interestingly, I can run ps2pdf on the original .ps (produced by lilypond-book), but when I try to run it on the result of the psbook and psnup, it produces this: spark:~/aaa/opus/op2/out gperciva$ psbook op2.ps | psnup -2 -ptabloid -Pletter > foo.ps [*] [1] [2] [3] Wrote 4 pages, 804556 bytes [1] [2] Wrote 2 pages, 807534 bytes spark:~/aaa/opus/op2/out gperciva$ ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=11x17 foo.ps foo.pdf Error: /rangecheck in --get-- Operand stack: names --nostringval-- 1 6147 --nostringval-- 37 Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- Dictionary stack: --dict:1124/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:81/200(L)-- --dict:53/72(ro)(G)-- --dict:10/30(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Last OS error: 2 Current file position is 4968 AFPL Ghostscript 8.51: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 Files sent privately upon request. Using psutils 1.17 and ps2pdf (ghostscript) 8.51 - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme
From 11.1.2 Internal music representation C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while \grace creates a Grace_music object. We expect that distinctions between different C++ types will disappear in the future. IIRC, a few years ago we replaced a bunch of C++ things with scheme. I also doubt that anybody's looked at this chapter in the past few years. Is this data still correct? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
\displayMusic should begin with a newline
A simple example of \displayMusic produces: spark:~/tmp gperciva$ lilypond bug.ly GNU LilyPond 2.8.2 Processing `bug.ly' Parsing...(make-music 'SequentialMusic 'elements (list (make-music 'EventChord 'elements (list (make-music ... IMO, it would be much nicer if it produced GNU LilyPond 2.8.2 Processing `bug.ly' Parsing... (make-music 'SequentialMusic 'elements (list (make-music ... Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
\displayLilyMusic should also have a newline.
Sorry, I didn't check this before sending the earlier message.
Parsing...{ a, cis e fis g }
=>
Parsing...
{ a, cis e fis g }
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
In the current manual, define-music-function is introduced late in the scheme chapter. I suspect that this is simply because define-music-function is a more recent lilypond construct, and whoever added it didn't want to disturb the existing material. Is that correct? I'm revising the chapter now (as you can tell from the previous half-dozen emails :), and it makes sense to me to _begin_ the chapter with define-music-function, and then work through the general theory of scheme, lilypond music expressions, etc. In other words, stick the define-music-function stuff *before* the current 11.1.1. Are there any objections? I really don't think that people need to know what #(ly:make-music-function (11.1.3) does before using define-music-function, but I still can't claim to fully understand #(ly:make-music-function myself, so I might be missing some vital info. My current sense is that define-music-function and \displayMusic (and perhaps a bit of patience) are the most important parts of 11.1. Thoughts? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to replace some of the embedded LilyPond code with Scheme code to get more flexibility. This second step, of course, is an excellent example of how to use \displayScheme. /Mats Graham Percival wrote: In the current manual, define-music-function is introduced late in the scheme chapter. I suspect that this is simply because define-music-function is a more recent lilypond construct, and whoever added it didn't want to disturb the existing material. Is that correct? I'm revising the chapter now (as you can tell from the previous half-dozen emails :), and it makes sense to me to _begin_ the chapter with define-music-function, and then work through the general theory of scheme, lilypond music expressions, etc. In other words, stick the define-music-function stuff *before* the current 11.1.1. Are there any objections? I really don't think that people need to know what #(ly:make-music-function (11.1.3) does before using define-music-function, but I still can't claim to fully understand #(ly:make-music-function myself, so I might be missing some vital info. My current sense is that define-music-function and \displayMusic (and perhaps a bit of patience) are the most important parts of 11.1. Thoughts? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(doc/language help) resp?
What does resp mean? I'm guessing something like "and"? Is it Dutch, or Latin? "One can not feed the #:line (resp #:center, #:column) command with a variable ..." "One should use the make-line-markup (resp., make-center-markup or make-column-markup) function..." This word certainly doesn't exist in English... - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc/language help) resp?
It's probably short for "respectively" and placed at the wrong place in the sentence. I don't know about Dutch, but in Swedish, we say something like "A respektive B" where you in English say "A and B, respectively". /Mats Graham Percival wrote: What does resp mean? I'm guessing something like "and"? Is it Dutch, or Latin? "One can not feed the #:line (resp #:center, #:column) command with a variable ..." "One should use the make-line-markup (resp., make-center-markup or make-column-markup) function..." This word certainly doesn't exist in English... - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
(doc help) 11.2, incomprehensible language
11.2 Markup programmer interface Markups are implemented as special Scheme functions. When applied with as arguments an output definition (\layout or \paper), and a list of properties and other arguments, produce a Stencil object. * Markup construction in Scheme * How markups work internally * Markup command definition I have no idea what the second sentence is trying to say. Can I simply delete it? - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc/language help) resp?
On 11-May-06, at 6:16 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: It's probably short for "respectively" and placed at the wrong place in the sentence. I don't know about Dutch, but in Swedish, we say something like "A respektive B" where you in English say "A and B, respectively". Thanks, fixed in CVS. - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
On 11-May-06, at 6:03 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other
similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to
replace some of the embedded LilyPond code with Scheme code
to get more flexibility.
Good, that was my intention.
This second step, of course, is an excellent example of how to use
\displayScheme.
What's this?
{
\displayScheme { c'4\f }
}
fails. Are you talking about the guile (display-scheme-music )
command, from Nicolas' webpage?
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) quick check on C++ vs. scheme
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:22, Graham Percival wrote: > From 11.1.2 Internal music representation > > C++ object: Each music object is represented by a C++ object. For > technical reasons, different music objects may be represented by > different C++ object types. For example, a note is Event object, while > \grace creates a Grace_music object. > > We expect that distinctions between different C++ types will disappear > in the future. > > > IIRC, a few years ago we replaced a bunch of C++ things with scheme. I > also doubt that anybody's looked at this chapter in the past few years. > Is this data still correct? No, there's only one Music class now (it changed somewhere in 2.7.x). -- Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote: > A simple example of \displayMusic produces: > > spark:~/tmp gperciva$ lilypond bug.ly > GNU LilyPond 2.8.2 > Processing `bug.ly' > Parsing...(make-music >'SequentialMusic >'elements >(list (make-music >'EventChord >'elements >(list (make-music > ... > > IMO, it would be much nicer if it produced > GNU LilyPond 2.8.2 > Processing `bug.ly' > Parsing... > (make-music >'SequentialMusic >'elements >(list (make-music > ... Try redirecting stderr and stdout to different files: lilypond bug.ly 2>err >out and you'll understand why the current behaviour is intended. -- Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
Sorry, I mean \displayMusic, nothing else.
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
On 11-May-06, at 6:03 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I would start with the last example of current 11.1.6 (or some other
similar example(s)). Then, we can introduce the basics of how to
replace some of the embedded LilyPond code with Scheme code
to get more flexibility.
Good, that was my intention.
This second step, of course, is an excellent example of how to use
\displayScheme.
What's this?
{
\displayScheme { c'4\f }
}
fails. Are you talking about the guile (display-scheme-music )
command, from Nicolas' webpage?
- Graham
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
On 11-May-06, at 7:01 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote: On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote: Processing `bug.ly' Parsing...(make-music 'SequentialMusic Try redirecting stderr and stdout to different files: lilypond bug.ly 2>err >out and you'll understand why the current behaviour is intended. OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ? Or is there another way to get stdout and stderr in separate files on windows? Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
Graham Percival wrote: OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ? Or is there another way to get stdout and stderr in separate files on windows? In general, I definitely don't think that we should assume/recommend Windows users to use cygwin/bash. In this particular situation it's just a matter of the small inconvenience of having to recognize and cut out the relevant part of the printouts manually. If you provide one example of the input and corresponding output, anybody should be able to do enough pattern matching to recognize what to look for, right? /Mats ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ? I don't think so. There's not even a cygwin version of 2.8 available. Or is there another way to get stdout and stderr in separate files on windows? I think the standard way works: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/redirection.mspx?mfr=true Geoff ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) 11.2, incomprehensible language
Since these details on the input and output of the Scheme functions are described in 11.2.3, we could skip it. Or reformulate it into something like: "Markups are implemented as special Scheme functions, that produce a Stencil object given a number of arguments." /Mats Graham Percival wrote: 11.2 Markup programmer interface Markups are implemented as special Scheme functions. When applied with as arguments an output definition (\layout or \paper), and a list of properties and other arguments, produce a Stencil object. * Markup construction in Scheme * How markups work internally * Markup command definition I have no idea what the second sentence is trying to say. Can I simply delete it? - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- = Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe = ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
Geoff Horton wrote: OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- can I assume that anybody on windows would be using cygwin/bash ? I don't think so. There's not even a cygwin version of 2.8 available. You can call the "native" windows LilyPond package from within a Cygwin command window if you just make sure to set the correct paths. However, given what you say below, there's no need for that. Or is there another way to get stdout and stderr in separate files on windows? I think the standard way works: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/redirection.mspx?mfr=true Great to learn that you can use some UNIX syntax in Windows! /Mats ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Can't run GUB 2.9.4 on linux
2006/5/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So it seems 2.8.1 is linked statically with libstdc++ and 2.9.4 isn't. Is this > intentional? No, there was a packaging error with GCC that slipped through in the installer. can you try the latest 2.9.4 build? thanks -- Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the current manual, define-music-function is introduced late in the
> scheme chapter. I suspect that this is simply because
> define-music-function is a more recent lilypond construct, and whoever
> added it didn't want to disturb the existing material. Is that
> correct?
You're absolutely right. First, the doc for ly:make-music-function was
introduced, then I added something for define-music-function, preserving
the previous documentation. Reading it again now, it is really strange.
> I'm revising the chapter now (as you can tell from the previous
> half-dozen emails :), and it makes sense to me to _begin_ the chapter
> with define-music-function, and then work through the general theory
> of scheme, lilypond music expressions, etc. In other words, stick the
> define-music-function stuff *before* the current 11.1.1. Are there
> any objections? I really don't think that people need to know what
> #(ly:make-music-function (11.1.3) does before using
> define-music-function, but I still can't claim to fully understand
> #(ly:make-music-function myself, so I might be missing some vital
> info.
ly:make-music-function is the interface with C++ code, and
define-music-function is the public interface. People don't need to know
about ly:make-music-function at all (people who would have to use it
would find it by themselves anyway).
> My current sense is that define-music-function and \displayMusic (and
> perhaps a bit of patience) are the most important parts of 11.1.
> Thoughts?
define-music-function, with a very straight forward use of the #{ #}
syntax, may be introduced first.
%%% Example with one music argument (a note)
custosNote =
#(define-music-function (parser location note)
(ly:music?)
#{
\once \override Voice.NoteHead #'stencil =
#ly:text-interface::print
\once \override Voice.NoteHead #'text =
\markup \musicglyph #"custodes.mensural.u0"
\once \override Voice.Stem #'stencil = ##f
$note
#})
{ c' d' e' f' \custosNote g' }
%%% Example with two music arguments
firstAndSecondTime =
#(define-music-function (parser location first-time second-time)
(ly:music? ly:music?)
#{
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta "1."))
$first-time
\bar ":|"
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f) (volta "2."))
$second-time
\set Score.repeatCommands = #'((volta #f))
#})
{ c'2 c'
\firstAndSecondTime { d' d' } { e' e' }
}
%%% Example with a markup argument
tempoMark =
#(define-music-function (parser location tempo-markup)
(markup?)
#{
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'padding = #2
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbol = #'left-edge
\mark \markup \fontsize #-1 \italic $tempo-markup
#})
{
\tempoMark \markup { Allegro molto. }
c'' c'' c'' c''
\mark "Another mark"
c'' c'' c'' c''
}
In a second step, a more complex example, requiring manipulating music
expressions, could be explained. There, \displayMusic should be used.
I don't have a good example in mind at the moment...
nicolas
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc/language help) resp?
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Graham Percival wrote: > >> What does resp mean? I'm guessing something like "and"? Is it >> Dutch, or Latin? >> >> "One can not feed the #:line (resp #:center, #:column) command with >> a variable ..." >> "One should use the make-line-markup (resp., make-center-markup or >> make-column-markup) function..." >> >> This word certainly doesn't exist in English... >> - Graham >> > It's probably short for "respectively" and placed at the wrong place > in the sentence. > I don't know about Dutch, but in Swedish, we say something like > "A respektive B" where you in English say "A and B, respectively". > >/Mats > Sorry, it was a French-ism, where it looks like the Swedish way: "A, respectivement B, ..." nicolas ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
A related question, how do you define a music function that takes a string or a markup as an argument? For the documentation, we should include a list of predicates (is this the correct term) to use to specify the argument type for all commonly occuring arguments, including: Music expression - ly:music? Integer argument - integer? Markup - markup? Text string - string? Scheme symbol- symbol? ... /Mats ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Can't run GUB 2.9.4 on linux
On Fri, 12 May 2006 05:38, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > 2006/5/11, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > So it seems 2.8.1 is linked statically with libstdc++ and 2.9.4 isn't. > > > Is this intentional? > > > > No, there was a packaging error with GCC that slipped through in the > > installer. > > can you try the latest 2.9.4 build? works great, thanks ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
what is 2.8.2?
how is it that there are binary packages for some systems for 2.8.2, but no source? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
Graham Percival wrote: On 11-May-06, at 7:01 AM, Erik Sandberg wrote: On Thursday 11 May 2006 14:30, Graham Percival wrote: Processing `bug.ly' Parsing...(make-music 'SequentialMusic Try redirecting stderr and stdout to different files: lilypond bug.ly 2>err >out and you'll understand why the current behaviour is intended. OK, I suppose that I could add that to the manual; it's easy enough on linux and OSX. But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix. Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use this week in a WXP class. Paul Scott ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
Hi, On Thu, 11 May 2006, Paul Scott wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > > > But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- > Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix. > Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use > this week in a WXP class. At least DOS does not really. Since it is not multitasked, IIRC you can pipe only 64K of text, and it does not even fail if there was more data. It's been quite a time since I seriously hacked DOS, though, so I could be completely wrong. Ciao, Dscho ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: \displayMusic should begin with a newline
Johannes Schindelin wrote: Hi, On Thu, 11 May 2006, Paul Scott wrote: Graham Percival wrote: But IIRC windows doesn't support pipes -- Sure it does. The original DOS came from some version of Unix. Redirection and pipes have always been there. I just taught their use this week in a WXP class. At least DOS does not really. Since it is not multitasked, ] The point was really about redirection of I/O anyway. That shouldn't require multitasking. IIRC you can pipe only 64K of text, and it does not even fail if there was more data. Probably not a problem for cmd under WXP which is what is (should be) used by many. I realize that some may be using W98 which may have problems here but again the point was really redirection. Have fun, Paul ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
configure does not check for python version >=2.4
Running whith e.g python 2.3.5 gives me: $ make ... make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts' cat convert-ly.py | sed -e '#' -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/bin/sh!g' -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED] chmod 755 out/convert-ly /usr/bin/perl /home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/buildscripts/out/help2man out/convert-ly > out/convert-ly.1 help2man: can't get `--help' info from out/convert-ly make[1]: *** [out/convert-ly.1] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts' make: *** [all] Error 2 Which fails due to missing module subprocess. It was introduced recently: $ grep -B7 -A1 subprocess ChangeLog 2006-03-12 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * scripts/lilypond-book.py (get_latex_textwidth): explicitly close tmphandle. * python/lilylib.py (system): rewrite system() using subprocess. Remove >& redirection trickery. Which makes python ver. 2.4 a requirement: http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.2/lib/module-subprocess.html Attached patch seems to solve that, though it gives strange error message: $./configure ... config.status: creating config.hh ERROR: Please install required programs: python2.3 >= 2.4 (installed: 2.3) Python.h (python-devel, python-dev or libpython-dev package) See INSTALL.txt for more information on how to build LilyPond Regards, /Karl --- Karl HammarAspö Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lilla Aspö 2340Networks S-742 94 Östhammar +46 173 140 57 Computers Sweden +46 70 511 97 84 Consulting --- Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.4948 diff -u -r1.4948 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 11 May 2006 13:00:10 - 1.4948 +++ ChangeLog 11 May 2006 22:58:37 - @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2006-05-12 Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * stepmake/aclocal.m4: bump python requirement to version 2.4 + 2006-05-11 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Documentation/user/programming-interface.itely: first round of Index: stepmake/aclocal.m4 === RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/stepmake/aclocal.m4,v retrieving revision 1.168 diff -u -r1.168 aclocal.m4 --- stepmake/aclocal.m4 3 May 2006 20:30:59 - 1.168 +++ stepmake/aclocal.m4 11 May 2006 22:58:37 - @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ fi AC_SUBST(SHELL) -STEPMAKE_PYTHON(REQUIRED, 1.5) +STEPMAKE_PYTHON(REQUIRED, 2.4) if expr "$MAKE" : '.*\(echo\)' >/dev/null; then $MAKE -v 2> /dev/null | grep GNU > /dev/null ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: what is 2.8.2?
Thomas Bushnell BSG schreef: how is it that there are binary packages for some systems for 2.8.2, but no source? good point. I forgot to upload. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc help) scheme: why not start with define-music-function ?
Mats Bengtsson schreef: A related question, how do you define a music function that takes a string or a markup as an argument? You don't. It has to take either a markup or a string. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: configure does not check for python version >=2.4
> > Running whith e.g python 2.3.5 gives me: > > $ make > ... > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts' > cat convert-ly.py | sed -e '#' -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/bin/sh!g' -e > '[EMAIL PROTECTED] > chmod 755 out/convert-ly > /usr/bin/perl /home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/buildscripts/out/help2man > out/convert-ly > out/convert-ly.1 > help2man: can't get `--help' info from out/convert-ly > make[1]: *** [out/convert-ly.1] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/scripts' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > Which fails due to missing module subprocess. > It was introduced recently: > > $ grep -B7 -A1 subprocess ChangeLog > > 2006-03-12 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * scripts/lilypond-book.py (get_latex_textwidth): explicitly close > tmphandle. > > * python/lilylib.py (system): rewrite system() using > subprocess. Remove >& redirection trickery. > > Which makes python ver. 2.4 a requirement: > http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.2/lib/module-subprocess.html > > Attached patch seems to solve that, though it gives strange error message: > > $./configure > ... > config.status: creating config.hh > > ERROR: Please install required programs: python2.3 >= 2.4 (installed: 2.3) > Python.h (python-devel, python-dev or libpython-dev package) > > See INSTALL.txt for more information on how to build LilyPond Hm, configure.in seems better suited for that change than stepmake/aclocal.m4. Changelog: 2006-05-12 Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.in: bump python requirement to version 2.4 Regards, /Karl --- Karl HammarAspö Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lilla Aspö 2340Networks S-742 94 Östhammar +46 173 140 57 Computers Sweden +46 70 511 97 84 Consulting --- Index: configure.in === RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 configure.in --- configure.in9 May 2006 08:21:17 - 1.191 +++ configure.in12 May 2006 00:01:44 - @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ -STEPMAKE_PYTHON(REQUIRED, 2.3) +STEPMAKE_PYTHON(REQUIRED, 2.4) STEPMAKE_GCC(REQUIRED, 4.0) STEPMAKE_CXX(REQUIRED) STEPMAKE_GXX(REQUIRED, 4.0) ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
MergeKern: Failed to find kern info in file
(Current cvs) $ make ... make[1]: Entering directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/mf' /usr/bin/fontforge -script ../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge /usr/X11R6/l... Copyright (c) 2000-2005 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 12:08 5-Dec-2005. MergeKern: Failed to find kern info in file Called from... ../buildscripts/pfx2ttf.fontforge: line 5 make[1]: *** [out/CenturySchL-Ital.otf] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/karl/most/music/lilypond/head/mf' make: *** [all] Error 2 configure checks where the pfb files for Century Schoolbook are, and assumes that the afm files are in the same directory. Which fails if the given file is a link the real pfb file (in some other direcotory): $ fc-match --verbose 'Century Schoolbook L:style=Italic' | grep file: file: "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/c059033l.pfb"(s) $ ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/c059033l.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 Nov 29 12:20 /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/c059033l.pfb -> ../../../../../share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/c059033l.pfb $ ls -l /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/c059033* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 43546 Apr 3 2005 /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/c059033l.afm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 113732 Apr 3 2005 /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/c059033l.pfb Attached patch solves that (still assuming that the afm is in the same directory as the "real" pfb file). One could possible do the same for the "./configure --with-ncsb-dir=..." case. 2006-05-12 Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * configure.in: resolve symlinks for pfb-files, to be able to find its afm file. Regards, /Karl --- Karl HammarAspö Data [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lilla Aspö 2340Networks S-742 94 Östhammar +46 173 140 57 Computers Sweden +46 70 511 97 84 Consulting --- Index: configure.in === RCS file: /sources/lilypond/lilypond/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 configure.in --- configure.in9 May 2006 08:21:17 - 1.191 +++ configure.in12 May 2006 00:41:35 - @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ NCSB_FILE=`$FCMATCH --verbose 'Century Schoolbook L:style=$style' | grep 'file:'` NCSB_FILE=`echo $NCSB_FILE | sed 's/^.*"\(.*\)".*$/\1/g'` + NCSB_FILE=`readlink -f $NCSB_FILE` NCSB_SOURCE_FILES="$NCSB_FILE $NCSB_SOURCE_FILES" done else ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: (doc/language help) resp?
> Sorry, it was a French-ism, where it looks like the Swedish way: > "A, respectivement B, ..." In German we have the same: `A bzw. B' (where `bzw.' is short for `beziehungsweise'). Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: implementation plan for music streams
On Thursday 11 May 2006 00:54, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> 2006/5/10, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Citerar Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Known issue: unfold-repeats will probably not work for percent
> > > I don't understand this. unfold-repeats is on the front end, we can
> > > just make it replace PercentRepeatMusic with UnfoldedRepeatMusic
> > > wholly; that should work, right?
> >
> > I implemented percent repeats in a way similar to tuplet brackets, i.e.
> > by sending a parallel event. One reason for this decision is that the
> > EventChord
> > iterator is where events are supposed to be reported.
>
> Yes, and that's what I disagree with. I agree you need to put in events for
> signaling information, but I oppose to inserting them in the parser. Can
> you change the code to make the iterators generate those events on the fly.
Hm, I guess the easiest/cleanest way would be to let the
percent-repeat-iterator create an implicit SequentialMusic around the music,
with the additional percent elements, and then to let process_music pretend
that this SequentialMusic expression is its 'element. That way, all
timekeeping can be outsourced to the Sequential_music_iterator, and the
percent-repeat-iterator can more-or-less be reduced to an override of
construct_children.
I also have two slightly related questions:
- In the best of worlds, should all events always be reported to bottom
contexts? I see no technical reasons why it would need to be that way, but
it's a nice convention and it requires little work.
- If answer is yes, then I'd like to suggest that Music_iterator::try_music
automatically should descend the iterator to a bottom context. That would
eliminate the parser's need to wrap expressions inside \context Bottom. I can
implement this when I've finished some more of the music stream refactorings.
> > > I don't understand. Why don't you send TupletSpanEvents (START, STOP)
> > >
> > > from the iterator? If you do that, you might even be able to scrap a
> > > lot of the hairy timekeeping logic in the engraver.
> >
> > The nice thing about my solution is that time-scaled-music-iterator can
> > be scrapped altogether. This could also be achieved with start/stop
> > events by expanding \times to
> > { TupletSpanStartEvent TupletSpanStopEvent }
> > but I guess there would be problems with nested tuplets (how to pair
> > START and
> > STOP events?)
>
> start and stop events are nested, just like parentheses. A stop stops the
> most recently started one.
ok, fair enough. Then would it be OK to let \times expand to a SequentialMusic
and drop the iterator, as I suggested? (I think there are essential
differences between this case and percent repeats, as the required
time-keeping in the iterator would be roughly equivalent to the current
time-keeping in Tuplet_engraver)
I'm also considering to change the engraver's tuplets_ member to a list or
stack, instead of vector.
--
Erik
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Yet Another music macro proposal
Hi,
I have yet another suggestion for how \relative can be soft-coded in a generic
way. It's inspired by criticism of earlier attempts. It's similar, but not
identical, to a previous suggestion.
Macros is that they operate on syntax, not on music. And the parser spits out
music directly. So what I suggest, is to let the parser spit out yet another
intermediate format, which is a Scheme expression that more or less
corresponds to the the parse tree. So, for example,
\repeat volta 2 { c8 d e \foo }
would parse into a Scheme expression
(repeat 'volta 2 (sequentialfoo))
where etc. are Music objects (or possibly expressions that evaluate to
Music objects).
When a top-level expression has been parsed into such scheme expression, it is
evaluated in a Scheme module, where repeat, sequential etc. are defined as
functions that return music; this evaluation produces the final music
expression.
Some benefits:
- It will be easy to make \relative a music macro, by defining relative as a
Scheme macro.
- The parser will be reduced to a thin layer of syntactic sugar, so a large
portion of parser.yy can be moved to scheme. Application of music functions
and dereferencing of variables is completely outsourced to guile.
- For those who want to do programming using lily syntax, it will be easy to
export Scheme functions and macros to the lily parser at runtime. This will
probably reduce the number of feature requests that come to our mailing
lists.
--
Erik
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
