Jan Waclawek wrote:
Richard,
how?  it suggests that someone who understands that there's a problem
should help solve that problem.

This is, in a sense, a circular argument. The one recognizing the problem, in this case, at least, is least prepared to do anything about it.

Not quite. If he's willing to ask and understand/try/check/test/whatever the 
offered answers, he might then very well be able to describe this particular 
item.
The one "recognizing the problem", may be "willing to ask and understand/try/check/test/whatever", and that is implied when he poses the question. There are many examples where the "offered answers" are helpful when the question addresses an application problem. But if the question addresses documentation or an IDE heaven forbid, the "offered answers" apparently have no perceptible value, so the one asking the questions is not inspired to "understand/try/check/test/whatever".
2) Such requests typically come from _users_, not necessarily developers.
who better than a user to help with documentation?  after all, it's
users that know what questions need to be answered.

While inherently true and correct, this is misleading. Those who need the documentation the most are new, actually would-be, users, like me, who'd use a product if there were sufficient "instructional material" to make it readily useable.

Most of the would-be users use SDCC and similar out of necessity - there's no 
alternative given a certain budget (namely, $0). Only a few chose SDCC because 
of other qualities of open-source software (e.g. possibility to add a feature), 
but that's sort of a necessity as well. And, most of these users, who WILL use 
SDCC anyway, need and will figure out this and that, given the incomplete 
documentation.
The problem with this theory, is that the user of necessity will take the same attitude which developers have about documentation, with one significant exception. While the developer is merely doing something he loves to do, the user of necessity (for the same reason he is a user), has no time for any peripheral projects, but must remain focused on his project upon which he depends to meet next months bills.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to