On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 6:49:11 AM UTC-7 julian...@fsfe.org wrote:
We have carefully reviewed [...] We therefore disagree with characterizing opposing opinions as “artificial friction”, “hostile demands”, or an “attempt to sabotage”. Such allegations will have no effect other than to antagonize the other party. This is not helpful in fostering constructive debate. Julian, please, that's highly inappropriate. I'm not characterizing opposing *opinions*. With this terminology I'm describing the modes of existing, persistent, non-constructive *actions* on these PRs by others. These are not "allegations"; what I am describing has been happening in plain sight, is fully documented, and has been reported to the sage-abuse and CoCC committees. As you know, some of these have already led to sanctions by the committees, while I am still waiting for acknowledgment (and clear actions) regarding numerous reported violations of our code of conduct (and reviewing code) by the current committee. I do understand that the new committee is still learning how to recognize and handle abuse; it's a complicated and challenging topic to master. In the meantime, as I have asked the committee in private already, more thoughtful restraint in issuing public reprimands is necessary. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/2bdbf209-edc2-4a0d-9b4c-de1c665d406bn%40googlegroups.com.
